June
21, 2005
Hang
Lung Property Management Limited
Unit
68 Amoy Plaza Phase 1
2/F
77 Ngau Tau Kok Road
Kowloon
Attn: Ms. Cora Yiu
Property
Manager
Dear
Ms. Yiu,
Re: Service Standard of Building Attendants
I
would like to draw your attention to the service standard of building attendants
regardless of my repeated complaints lodged during the meetings with your Mr.
Tony Mak, Deputy Estate Manager on June 3 ad 14, 2005.
First Meeting
(06/03/05) |
||
|
|
|
06/02/05
(Thursday) |
|
I
lodged a complaint against the building attendant’s service with Mr. Y.H.
Yeung about what happened last night.
I carried my 29-month son back to home around 22:30 and pressed the
“CT button” on security access system panel.
The building attendant, sitting on his security post, released door
lock through the control button. However,
it did not function and he did not stop trying.
I asked him to come out and open door through the gap of entrance
door. But he ran out from the
main door of security room instead of the new door besides him which took
longer time. |
06/03/05
(Friday) |
|
Mr.
Yeung replied that the Company had complied internal guidelines –
building attendant would decide whether they opened door for occupants and
it would be depended on the circumstances.
He also accepted the building attendant’s explanation that it
would be noisy when moving away the chair to open the door besides him.
I found Mr. Yeung’s reply was unacceptable and had a meeting with
Mr. Mak around 17:45. During
the meeting, I pointed out that guidelines must be clearly set as building
attendant might be unable to make judgement.
In addition, if the guideline clearly stated that all building
attendants should use the new door besides security post when going in and
out as it would be faster, then the above situation could be avoided. I
also reflected that service standard of building attendant was not
standardized. No matter regular or relieving staff (except the regular
night-shift Building Attendant – Mr. Tsang) of Block N rarely opened
door for occupants even though the circumstances deemed necessary such as
carrying baby with stroller. Mr.
Mak apologized and agreed that Mr. Yeung’s explanation was insufficient.
He also did not know Mr. Yeung replied me in this way .
He would follow up the case. |
|
|
|
Second Meeting
(06/14/05) |
||
|
|
|
06/14/05
(Tuesday) |
|
Yellow
rainstorm signal was hoisted when I was back from the market.
My two hands were occupied with a lot of foodstuff and an umbrella.
I pressed the “CT button”.
As C.Y. Man (文灶賢)
had no intention to walk out and released door lock through control panel,
I had to spare one hand to pull the door.
I lodged my complaint with Mr. Mak again. During
the meeting, I told him that improvement was observed in the past week.
I wondered why there was discrepancy in the service standard. Mr.
Mak answered me some staff were incooperative.
He had already changed the respective supervisor after last
meeting. He expressed his apology again and promised to follow up. |
|
|
|
Regardless
of my repeated complaints, the service standard is still not standardized.
On June 16, 2005, when I was back from the market around 17:15, it was
heavy raining. My two hands were
occupied with foodstuff and umbrella. When
I arrived the entrance door, BA380 - F.H. Wong (王興福) looked at me and had no intention to open door.
I was so helpless that I spared one hand to press “CT button” and
open door.
I
do understand that building attendants are not responsible for opening door for
occupants. But, in view of the afore-mentioned circumstances, offering
assistance is undoubtedly justified.
I
believe Hang Lung Property Management Limited, being one of the prestigious
company in property management field, should be a caring company and would
constantly review and upgrade the service standard, thus, fostering a harmonious
relationship with your stakeholders.
For
further contact, you can reach our xxxxx
Yours
sincerely,
Registered
Owner of xxxxxx, Amoy Gardens