Pui Wah Kong, Tze Chung Luk and Youlian Hong
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Taekwondo will become an official
event in the 2000 Olympic Games. During competition, over 80% of techniques
executed are kicks and roundhouse kick is one of the most frequently used
kicking techniques. The purpose of this study was to examine the difference
between roundhouse kick executed by the front and back leg. Kicking performance
of eight subjects was videotaped using two Peak video cameras at 120 Hz. Video
materials were digitized by a three-dimensional motion analysis system (BAS,
Germany). Significant
differences were found in the movement time (p < .005), maximum linear
velocity of ankle (p < .005) and maximum linear velocity of knee (p <
.005) between the two kicks. The roundhouse kick executed by the front
leg is faster while that by the back leg is more forceful. It is
suggested that the former might be more effective during fast attack and the
later would make the opponent more difficult to block, thus creating new
chances to further attack.
KEY WORDS: taekwondo, roundhouse kick, motion analysis, movement time,
velocity.
INTRODUCTION: Taekwondo,
the Korean martial arts, has been adopted as an official sport of the Sydney 2000
Olympic Games, having featured at the 1988 and 1992 Olympics as a demonstration
sport. Previous research had been done on the physiological response of human
body towards taekwondo training (Cho, & Choe, 1988; Pieter, Taaffe, &
Heijmans, 1990; Pieter, & Taaffe, 1992; Shirley, 1992), as well as
psychological aspect of taekwondo athletes (Pieter, & Taaffe, 1992). There
were also biomechanical studies on taekwondo kinetics (Hwang, 1987; Pieter, F.,
Pieter, W., & Heijmans, 1987; Pieter, Heijmans, & Taffe, 1989; Pieter,
Taaffe, Troxel, & Heijmans, 1989) and kinematics (Hwang, 1987; Sørensen,
Zacho, Simonsen, Dyhre-Poulsea and Klausen,1996; Pieter, 1991; Serina, &
Lieu, 1991; Pieter, F., & Pieter, W., 1995). However, there is little
research focused on the difference between the
roundhouse kick executed by the front and back leg. The purpose of this study
was to examine the kinematic difference between roundhouse kick executed by the
front and back leg using three-dimensional motion analysis.
Reflective markers were attached to the kicking leg of each
subject at 4 joints, which were (1) shoulder: lateral joint line of shoulder
joint; (2) hip: greater trochanter of femur; (3) knee: lateral epicondyle of
femur; and (4) ankle: lateral malleolus.
Subjects were asked to
perform 6 trials of roundhouse kick, of which 3 were executed by the front leg
and 3 by the back leg. Kicking sequence of the trials was randomized. Subjects
prepared in kicking stance and kicked to a training bag at their waist level. A
light emitting diode (LED) was placed at the top of the training bag to
generate a start-kicking signal at eye level of the
subject (see Figure 1). An accelerometer
(34100A, 15g, Summit Instruments, USA) was inserted inside the bag to record
the time that the kicks reached the bag. Two Peak video cameras at 120Hz and
1/500 shuttle speed were placed on the lateral and postero-lateral side
at 5m away from the subject to record the kicking
performance. A 1m ¡Ñ1m ¡Ñ2m cubic frame was videotaped for calibration purposes.
Movement time was defined as the time duration between
starting signals from LED and the attacking signal from the accelerometer. The
video materials were digitized and analyzed on a motion analysis system (BAS,
Germany). The raw data of motion analysis was smoothed with a digital filter at
a cut-off frequency of 6 Hz. Maximum linear
velocities of ankle, maximum linear velocity of knee, minimum knee angle,
maximum knee angle, minimum hip angle and maximum angular velocity of knee
extension were calculated. ROM of knee was calculated by the difference of
maximum and minimum knee angle. The median value of each data from the 3
trial was taken. Paired sample t-test was used to
compare the difference between these two techniques. Pearson Product
Moment correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between
ROM and maximum angular velocity of knee. The 0.05 level of significance was
used.
RESULTS: There were significant differences in the
movement time (p < .005), maximum linear velocity of ankle (p < .005) and
maximum linear velocity of knee (p < .005) between the two kicks. No significant difference was found in minimum knee angle,
maximum knee angle, minimum hip angle, angular velocity of knee extension, and
ROM of knee between the two techniques (see Table 1).
Table 1. Comparison of Roundhouse Kick executed by
Front and Back Leg. (add unit)
Parameters (n=7) |
front leg |
back leg |
degree of
freedom |
t value |
movement time |
0.73¡Ó0.10s |
0.83¡Ó0.09s |
7 |
-4.348* |
maximum linear velocity of ankle |
18.83¡Ó5.81
m/s |
26.26¡Ó8.86
m/s |
7 |
-4.559* |
maximum linear velocity of knee |
9.0¡Ó3.49
m/s |
14.56¡Ó6.04
m/s |
7 |
-4.777* |
minimum knee angle |
1.70¡Ó0.35rad |
1.68¡Ó0.36rad |
7 |
0.177 |
maximum knee angle |
2.88¡Ó0.24rad |
2.87¡Ó0.14rad |
7 |
0.539 |
minimum hip angle |
1.76¡Ó0.40rad |
1.71¡Ó0.40rad |
7 |
0.867 |
maximum angular velocity of knee extension |
15.94¡Ó5.38rad/s |
15.22¡Ó5.80rad/s |
7 |
0.393 |
ROM of knee |
1.18¡Ó0.40rad |
1.12¡Ó0.36rad |
7 |
0.528 |
*p < .005 |
|
|
|
|
The movement time of the roundhouse kick
executed by the front leg was 12% shorter than that of the back leg. The
maximum linear velocity of the roundhouse kick executed by the back leg was
greater than that of the front leg by 39.46% and 61.78% for the ankle and knee
respectively. All subjects attained greater maximum linear velocity of ankle
and knee in the roundhouse kick executed by the back leg. Individual subjects¡¦
maximum linear velocity of ankle and knee are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Typical patterns of linear velocity of ankle and knee in
both kicks are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. Maximum velocities
were reached prior to impact in all trials.
Figure 5. The linear velocity of
ankle and knee in roundhouse kick executed by the back leg. Impact Impact
The correlation of the ROM
and angular velocity of knee was 0.895 (p < .005) and 0.792 (p < .05) for
the front leg and back leg respectively. It was interesting to find that there
were two different types of kicking style: type 1 and type 2. Typical examples
are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7. In type 1 kicking style, there was
prominent knee flexion (from A to B) followed by rapid extension (from B to C)
to kick (see Figure 6). In type 2 kicking style, the leg remained rather
straight throughout the whole kicking process with was only slight knee flexion
near the end of kick (see Figure 7). There were 5 subjects performing type 1
kicking style and 2 subjects performing type 2 kicking style. One subject
performed the roundhouse kick
executed by the front leg
in type 1 kicking style and that of the back leg in type 2 kicking style.
A B C
The roundhouse kick executed with
the back leg showed greater velocity. This result supports the findings of
Serina and Lieu (1991) who suggested that the addition of a spin to kick
execution would result in greater velocities. The roundhouse kick executed by
the back leg requires the waist to turn more than that of the front leg. The
turning of waist causes trunk rotation which can be taken as a small spin before
kicking. The greater velocity results in greater momentum (p=mv). This forceful
kick would make the opponent more difficult to block the kick, thus creating
new chances to further attack. According to the WTF rules of competition, when
a contestant is knocked down as a result of the opponent¡¦s attack on a part of
the trunk protector which is not a part of a legal area, such a technique shall
be regarded as a point (WTF, 2000). Thus, the roundhouse kick executed by the
back leg may even win a point directly if it is powerful enough to knock the
opponent down.
Similar to the results of previous
research, maximum velocities were attained immediately prior to reaching the
target. Hwang (1987) observed that maximum foot speeds were reached prior to
target in all front kicks. Suwat (1996) also found that the linear velocity of
ankle in Thai roundhouse kick reached the maximum velocity at 48£gsec prior to the point of
impact. Practically, it is difficult for human to reach maximum velocity
exactly at the point of impact. Such a slow down in velocity may be due to the
reflex contraction of hamstring to protect the knee joint before the leg is
fully extended.
The high
correlation between the ROM of knee and angular velocity of knee extension suggests that increasing knee flexion
before extending to kick can generate greater angular velocity. The two
different kicking styles should have different ROM, and may involve different
muscular activities. Further studies on EMG together with motion analysis are
needed before a conclusion can be made.
CONCLUSION:
This
study has investigated the difference in roundhouse kick executed by the front
and the back leg by 3D motion analysis. Since the roundhouse kick executed by
the front leg requires less time than the that of the back leg, it might be
more effective in fast attacking legal area to score point during competition.
The roundhouse kick executed by the back leg, on the other hand, generates
greater momentum (p = mv), which would make the opponent more difficult to block
and thus create new chances to further attack. It may even win a point directly
if it is executed powerful enough to knock the opponent down.
REFERENCES:
Cho. J.W., and Choe, M.A.
(1988). A study on the effect of taekwondo training on the physical performance
in preschool children --- longitudinal studies. WTF Taekwondo, 8(4),
34-39.
Dunn, E.G. (1987).
Kicking speed and lower extremity kinematics. Proceedings of 1987
International Symposium of Biomechanics in Sports, Halifax, N.S.
Hwang , I. (1987).
Analysis of the kicking leg in taekwondo. Proceedings of 1987 International
Symposium of Biomechanics in Sports, Halifax, N.S.
Lee, S. J. (1998). The
influence of rapid weight loss periods on cardiorespiratory and muscle function
in taekwondo players. WTF taekwondo, 98(winter), 9.
Pieter, F., Pieter, W.
& Heijmans, J. (1987). Movement analysis of taekwondo techniques. Asia
Journal of Physical Education, 10(3), 45-48.
Pieter, W., Heijmans, J.,
& Taaffe, D. (1989). Isokinetic leg strength of taekwondo practitioners. Asia
Journal of Physical Education, 12(3), 55-64.
Pieter, W., Taaffe, D.,,
Troxel, R., & Heijmans, J. (1989). Isokinetic peak torque of the quadriceps
and hamstrings of college age taekwondo athletes. Journal of Human Movement
Studies, 16, 17-25.
Pieter, W., Taaffe, D.,
& Heijmans, J. (1990). Heart rate response to taekwondo forms and technique
combinations --- a pilot study. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical
Fitness, 30(1), 97-102.
Pieter, W. (1991).
Performance characteristics of elite taekwondo athletes. Korean Journal of
Sport Science, 3, 94-117.
Pieter, F. & Pieter,
W. (1995). Speed and force in selected taekwondo techniques. Biology of
Sport, 12(4), 257-266.
Pieter, W. & Taaffe,
D. R. (1992). The Oregon taekwondo research project: results and
recommendations. Journal of Asian Martial Arts, 1(1), 72-85.
Serina, E. R. & Lieu,
D. K. (1991). Thoracic injury potential of basic competition taekwondo kicks. Journal
of Biomechanics, 24(10), 951-960.
Shirley, M. E. (1992).
The taekwondo side kick: a kinesiological analysis with strength and
conditioning principles. National Strength and Conditioning Association
Journal, 14(5), 7-8; 72-28.
Sørensen, H., Zacho, M.,
Simonsen, E. B., Dyhre-Poulsen, P. & Klausen, K. (1996). Dynamics of the
martial arts high front kick. Journal of Sports Science, 14,
483-495.
Suwat, S. (1996). Kinetic
and kinematic analysis of Thai boxing roundhouse kicks. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University.