Steroid forums
of gains: we observed that much change, after all, and it might be that chance did not work in favor of the Supplement X group. steroid forums Steroids and danger. It's even possible that X might cause more gains than we observed, but it suffered from bad luck in this study, with its group getting more than its share of slow gainers. So we do not know. The 1 lb. steroid forums Side effects of steroid use. observed change is not significant because we cannot be confident that it did not happen by chance. How big a change would have been needed for the statistics to say the difference is "significant"?With subjects as variable as this, and only 10 in each group, the answer is about 4 lb. Any measured increase (caused by Supplement X or not) of less than 4 lb. steroid forums Steroids cutting cycles. will not be found significant by this study. Only observed increases of more than 4 lb. would be deemed significant. So if we don't care about gains of less than 4 lb. anyway, then "no significant increase" in the scientific sense matches up well with practical application. But if we do consider a 1 to 3 lb. change important, then the study is not sensitive enough and is inadequate. To be able to find smaller observed changes such as 1 lb. to be significant, we would need either less variability among the subjects, or more subjects, so luck could not have as much effect.
Steroid forums
Steroid || Free bodybuilding diet || Effects of anabolic steriods || The-danger-of-steroids