EDITED BY HVF WINSTONE

CONTENTS

This issue consists entirely of correspondence relating to the assassination of physicist Dr G V Bull and the suspicious circumstances relating to politicians of both Conservative and Labour administrations in connection with the famous long-barrel gun, the attack on Iraq and the donation of political funds. This and allied documentation can be found on the anti-Masonic web site

 (Victims of Masonic Ill Treatment)

HISTORY: for first issue of INSIGHT with extensive historical source material on Arab/Israeli/Zionist affairs

Mr. Peter Harris

Merrion Corporation

2 Bedford Square

London WC2 3RA

England. December 12, 1989

Ref.: GVB.pt. 260

Dear Mr Harris,

During our meeting last Thursday you told me that a revised technical specification of the Merrion SW System was now ready for distribution. I am indeed prepared to assess the system to determine if it could be deployed with 155 mm artillery as you propose. I have now received a reply from the Department of Commerce who confirm Telford's insistence that the existing trade restriction imposed by the US would prevent intact assembly from being supplied to the PLA.

However, I was informed by friends in Washington that a complete system could be sent by Merrion Limited to the Chinese Military Delegation so they can fully evaluate it. If they were interested in purchasing the system, a sale could be arranged from the UK. I have arranged to meet Telford in his office at 11 a.m. on 18th December to discuss the options open to you in this respect. It would be helpful if you would attend the meeting despite the short notice.

Your anxiety with regard to the manoeuvres of the Board of Trade were well expressed. I can confirm that Shehadah is one of these shell companies which they set up to finance these projects in the Middle East. DEFCO is being used for exactly the same purpose.

At the present time a large proportion of the defence contracts entered into by the UK companies are being brokered by your associates in Armscor which includes the proposal put forward by Merrion. They cannot conduct the business directly from the States, and so use a proxy in the UK. What you now propose would previously have been undertaken by Ferranti.

All the loose ends are now being tied up. Those proxy companies set up to fuel the conflict between Iran and Iraq have served their purpose and are being put into receivership. The official line is that ISC Ferranti were closed down because the orders on the books of ISC Ferranti did not exist. We were led to believe that when the two companies amalgamated they were no longer viable. In reality vested interests demanded the closure of Ferranti t conceal

???????????? MANSONVILLE, QUEBEC, CANADA ??????

how it was used as a vehicle for trading on behalf of Armscor by state-sponsored industrial groups in America and the UK.

In this respect the main business has always been controlled by the conglomerates, in the UK these include British Aerospace, GEC-Marconi IMS. Daniel Grunberg of GEC told me that the government policy is to back his company by awarding contracts which ensure the continued development of new systems. In order to do this they have seconded their own personnel to tout for foreign business. The foreign contracts tend to be awarded to companies set up specifically for the purpose. Merrion is such a company. These proxy companies have main roles. First, the contract is awarded to them in order that they may assume responsibility if anyone discovers that the business breaks existing guidelines as set down by the government. Second, they have a financial role which would be impossible for the larger companies more closely associated with the Foreign Office and Defence Ministry.

You obviously understand what this entails in terms of financial commitments to those involved in setting up the proxy companies and arranging their business. Your explanation of the way you are using Zastava to conduct business for Armscor is an illustration of how the cartel operates. But you should be aware that Merrion will no doubt close down or be taken over in the near future. When in his cups, Kock from MITS told me that Astra, IMS and SRC would soon have outlived their usefulness and go into receivership.

This occurred two weeks after I complained to the Foreign Office that Boyce and Pierce had come to see me. They told me that an accident was "imminent" if I continued to cause trouble by my financial investigation of SRC/PRB.

It is clear that their masters are worried about the money by PRB, SRC and certain other companies without any commercial justification. Nobody is losing any sleep about the supply of defence equipment to Iran or Iraq. Even the Saudis are now being supplied with battlefield weapons yielding several kilotons and the supply of which oiled Al Yamamah. On that alone I can vouch for the fact that Thatcher, Heseltine and Clark, amongst others, have had money paid directly into their family accounts in Switzerland and Liechtenstein. Altogether they have amassed a fortune from the defence contracts with Iraq and the Saudis. So far the Tory party alone has been enriched by £20 million, following the tradition established by Reginald Maudling.

It would have remained unnoticed were it not for my investigation of the series of commissions paid by PRB and SRC. The companies to which money was transferred had no commercial links of any sort with PRB and SRC. Several months after I started the process of tracing the accounts, I obtained via a friend at the DIA in Washington details of those accounts to which the really large transfers were made. I am enclosing samples of some of the credit transfers. You can see there is no doubt who owns the companies where the money was deposited. The lesson is that nothing financial is really secret, because the bank somewhere holds the information identifying the account holder, or their representative. Clearly US Intelligence has cameras recording every visit by customers of the main banks in places such as Switzerland where these payoffs take place.

There is in effect an established method whereby the Foreign Office is raising money for its active participation in foreign politics. The money cannot be declared to any of the committees which oversee routine expenditure, since it is being used to subvert foreign governments, supposedly thereby protecting our national interest. Really this means ensuring that UK companies continue to trade by exploiting the countries concerned, supplying us with oil and minerals as cheaply as possible. They are also persuaded to buy from us defence equipment that they do not really need, which prevents them developing their industrial infrastructure and competing with us industrially.

Economic ascendancy is the object of the exercise. Funds are needed to support this policy in Africa and the Middle East: Iraq, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia are the most recent examples. The money used to set up the projects is all being raised by mans which are entirely unlawful, entailing the milking of companies by agents such a Kock, Julius and Martens. They have been working with the company accountants to extract money in the form of commissions paid to companies set u p solely with this in mind.

Nobody with any real power gets upset that traditionally we supply even the most ruthless regimes with every type of weapon. If we did not they would confiscate our assets and do business with someone else. Your people were allowed to buy an initial 80% of SRC in order to develop their artillery capability. Ferranti supplied most of the electronics for your ABP at the insistence of the Board of Trade, and despite the embargo. Otherwise we all know there would have been a subtle erosion of British assets, and an interruption of the supply of strategic materials.

Those in power understand the real position. Noisy politicians and the press are too stupid to make it worthwhile providing them with an explanation.

I need your help with regard to my current predicament. If you decide to come to my meeting on 18th December with Telford, I would be grateful if you would bring along copies of all the documents relating to the NG series of contracts. I am compiling a dossier of all the financial transactions which have caused so much discomfort at the Foreign Office. I have discussed this at some length with Hodgson, who has advised me to take the whole matter very seriously. I have already drawn up a statement outlining the nature of the threats which I have received. This has been lodged with my solicitor, and I will supply you with a copy next week.

Of course the primary question is where to go with the dossier. The Cabinet Office is implicated, and so is the Foreign Office and the Board of Trade. Even if new ministers are appointed there are senior officials who were involved in negotiating virtually all the contracts, and who profited directly. They received commissions, a policy which is deliberate since it guarantees they will deny anything untoward took place.. It would be interesting to observe how they react in the event of a formal Parliamentary investigation.

I know I can rely on you not to conclude that I am taking too an extreme view of the threat. The warning received from Pierce and Boyce left me in no doubt that the spearhead of our political establishment now consider me "an unviable proposition". My position is at present an invidious one. Kock described how Roberto Calvi was persuaded to fly to Gatwick by John Metters. I suppose this example was designed to emphasise the dangers I might face. Apparently Calvi's Banco Ambrosiano was being used by Julius Faux to raise money by a scheme which resembles in every respect that in which PRB and SRC are now embroiled. Meters was operating the finance company in Brighton that Faux set up to extract money from Cisalpine Overseas Bank in Nassau. Calvi was murdered while he was in London. He travelled there by train from Brighton, having told Faux and Metters he would release to the press details of how Ambrosiano, Cisalpine and BCCI had inadvertently funded the Security Service.

You can understand my concern after our discussion. I hope to meet you on 18th December. In any case please will you send me all the NG documentation as son as possible.

Yours sincerely,

Signed Dr.G V Bull

Dr Bull was murdered in Belgium shortly after he wrote this letter. Mossad was blamed and the Supergun was used as a red herring. Whoever did the killing MI6 must have been behind it.

Note that Italian forensic experts recently exhumed Roberto Calvi and came to the definite conclusion that he had been murdered.

Cocaine is the main currency nowadays. It is distributed at Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire where an elderly whistleblower was saved from a police marksman by the timely arrival of a councillor in August 1999. Operators at the drug site were Field Nominees, Front Street, Hamilton, Bermuda. A recent £2 million "donation" to the Labour Party came from Hamilton, Bermuda. Seychelles is another major money laundering location. Blair tried to make a secret of his first visit there at Christmas 1997.

Three victims of these Foreign Office/ MI5/DTI/MOD/Cabinet rackets are Peter Hayward (aka Sir Nicholas Lyell), Dr John Drewe and Gerald James of Astra (page 2, last line of 3rd para.).

Return to Archive