Abortion, Marriage, and State's Rights; Artificial Insemination of the Aged
Icono Clast
Election November 2008

Send me a note.

Two Questions for McCain/Palin

ABORTION and States' Rights

McCAIN/PALIN has said it believes the legality of a medical procedure, the termination of an unwanted pregnancy, should be the decision of each State. Suppose only Alaska and Hawai'i legalized such procedures.
MMMWhat words of wisdom do you have for the matronly minimum wage couple in Miami for the mandatory motherhood your policy would impose?

MARRIAGE and States' Rights

McCAIN/PALIN has expressed the belief that whom you choose to marry should be the business of the several states. I found one political entity recommending a “Yes” vote on a California proposition dictating the gender mix of marriages.
MMMWhat words of wisdom do you have for a legally wedded same-sex couple having to move to a state where they could be prosecuted for committing “crimes against nature” in order to advance in a career?
Preceding posted to UseNet Groups rec.arts.dance, rec.travel.usa-canada, ca.politics, alt.politics.democrat, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.california, alt.politics.bush, soc.culture.usa, and alt.abortion on October 25, 2008


THE MEDIA of communication are ripe with reports of old birth-givers. Glowing comments surround these medical tricks that might have some lofty purpose that I cannot perceive.
MMMIn none of the reports to which I've given attention is any consideration given to the victims of these births, those tragic children whose parents, if alive when they get to school, will be an embarrassment even if they're well- and mobile-enough to participate with normal parents.
MMMI see these self-centered, inconsiderate, selfish old orphan-creatresses as among the saddest, most self-deceived, egotistical, and needy of creatures. We should turn our backs to them with contempt rather than face them with praise. Their trickster “doctors” are even worse because, above all, what they're doing to those poor creatures is in violation of the first law of their profession.
MMMThe only case of which I know that fails to fill me with profound sadness for the unfortunate child is of a 60-ish woman who bore a child for her infertile daughter. Perhaps her ulterior motive was to become a grandmother but at least there was an altruistic façade.
MMMAnyone in, or beyond, the fourth decade of life should very seriously consider the consequences for their offspring when discussing becoming parents at such an advanced age. The sociological, psychological, and physical well-being and compatibility with children 30 years younger than a parent are significantly different from those factors with children 20 years younger than a parent.
MMMI implore the medical profession to accept the fact that it can perform this senseless trick. Isn't it enough that it's been proven possible? Must it continue to contribute to the births of babies who are all but guaranteed to be orphaned decades earlier than normal?
MMMIf it isn't enough to accept that it can be done without doing it again, I would like to see some sound reasoning why children should be intentionally burdened with parents so ancient that they're more likely to be care-takers for, rather than being taken care of by, their parents. So far, I’ve seen nary a word.

27 April 2002IconoClast  
25 November 2008 — So far, I’ve seen nary a word.

Back to Table of Contents

26 X 8 29 X 8 — 11.4