Stability of the Solar System

History of the question

The Solar System exists already several billions of years. All this time the planets are rotating around the Sun, and revolving around their own axes. The Solar System does not exist in the ideally empty space. Planets are constantly bombarded by meteorites. It is possible that in the billions years history they were even hit by asteroids. Every such collision must change the planet's orbits. The Solar System must be transformed from the regular system into chaotic system. Some planets must be rejected from the Solar System, and some of them must be swallowed by Sun. Nevertheless the order exists in the Solar System. The radiuses of planets rotation approximately satisfy the Titius-Bode rule. With the help of this rule the asteroids belt was discovered.

The Titius-Bode rule:

a = 0.1(3*2ⁿ+4) astronomical units.

Where, a is an average distance of a planet to the Sun, measured in astronomical units.
n_Mercury = " - infinity";
n_Venus = 0;
n_Earth = 1;
n_Mars = 2;
n_{asteroids, or former Phaeton} = 3;
n_Jupiter = 4...

If in the Solar System there is an order, then there is some force which supports this order. If some influence had changed the orbit of some planet, then this force must return the planet into it's place.

Gravity velocity and Laplace

Marquis de Laplace (1749 -1827) had clearly realized that the Solar System is very sensitive to perturbations. At his times it was already known that the velocity of light was finite. And this means that the visible and the real positions of the Sun in the sky do not coincide.

Let's investigate the simplest cases. Two objects, A and B, having the same masses, rotate clockwise around the common center of masses, C. Let in the moment t=0 they lie on the line.

A.........................C........................B

Because the velocity of light is finite, the observer A does not see B in it's real position. He sees it there, where B was some time before. Let's denote that point B'. The same conclusion is valid for the observer B.

.................................................B'

A.........................C.........................B

A'...............................................

Both observers see each other a little ahead from the position of the center of masses. If gravity forces are spreading with the same velocity as light do, then every of these objects will be subjected by the accelerating force. That means that the system must be accelerated and disperse.

That is why; Laplace had come to conclusion about the almost infinite velocity of spreading of gravity forces. Thus, we can see, that already two hundred years ago, in order to save the Solar System, the great Laplace had made the erroneous unnatural conclusion because he could not see yet the opposite compensating force.

At the beginning of the twentieth century there was proved that there are no velocities bigger than the velocity of light. As a result the conclusion of Laplace must be changed. It was necessary to find the new way to save the Solar System from the dispersion. And again the unnatural conclusion was made. The leading scientists have concluded that the gravity and visible positions of the Sun do not coincide.

Cunning tricks in cosmology

According to the contemporary cosmology the Universe expands -- the distances between the galaxies are constantly growing. The question arises: At what scales there is no expansion? But Big Bang cosmologists are cunning persons. In order to hide their false conclusions they assert that there is no expansion inside the galaxies. But why? According to your model galaxies are rushing away from each other, and accordingly to your new observations the expansion has the acceleration, such that the Hubble constant becomes a real constant and does not depend from the age of the Universe. But galaxies are not expanding...

No, dear bigbangers! In this case your Big Bang is a Big Grenade.

If we speak about expansion then we must say that space expands everywhere: between the galaxies and inside the galaxies. In this case the stars inside the galaxies do not move on the circular orbits, but move on the spiral orbits on the expanding space. Thus the stable galaxies and stable star systems will have the approximately constant shape and approximately constant dimensions. Unstable galaxies and star systems will be torn on parts by space expansion or gathered into the more compact object. Planets are trending to their attracting star. Their trajectories are also spirals on the expanding space. The Hubble expansion brakes the velocity of a planet. The force found by Laplace accelerates the planets. The Hubble force is compensated by the Laplace force. If Laplace would know about the existence of the Hubble force, he would not make his unnatural conclusion about the infinite velocity of gravity forces. If Einstein would not listen to the lovers of the expanding model of Universe, he would not make his biggest error and he would not reject the static model of the Universe. His first correct model contained the gravity and antigravity. Contemporary cosmologists again invent the antigravity but their attempts are funny. They must reject Big Bang model as nonsense.

Now we will prove that in order to explain the stability of the Solar System, the two opposite mutually compensating forces must exist: the Hubble force and the Laplace force. Thus we will receive one more precise independent method of Hubble constant deduction.

The cause of Solar System stability

Let's suppose that the space expands everywhere with the constant rate:

v=HR.

The space is constantly being absorbed by the massive objects. This looks as gravity force directed to the massive objects. The direction of gravity force to attractive object coincides with the direction of its visible position in the sky. (Here we have rejected the unnatural conclusions of Laplace and of the leading scientists of twentieth century)

The expansion of space gives the planets the negative acceleration. The shifted ahead position of gravitating object gives the positive acceleration. If the sum of these accelerations is equal to zero then the planet moves on stable orbit.

Let planet with mass m rotates on the circumference of radius r with velocity v. Then the Sun with mass M rotates on the circumference of radius R with velocity V around the common center of masses C.

The forces, accelerating the Earth and Sun are equal, accordingly:

F_Sun = Fv/c; F_Earth = FV/c.

The power, spent on acceleration is equal to the product of force and velocity:

P_Sun = FvV/c; P_Earth = FVv/c.

After substitution we'll have:

v =sqr(rF/m); V=sqr(RF/M); F=GMm/(r+R)²;

P = GMm/(r+R)² * sqr(rF/m) * sqr(RF/M) / c.

P = G²M^3/2m^3/2/(r+R)⁴ * sqr(rR)/c.

Let's investigate two cases: 1 - masses are equal; 2 - mass of the star are much more the mass of a planet.

1. m=M; r=R,

P=G²M³/(2R)⁴*R/c=G²M³/(16R³c).

2. If M is much more than m, then r is much more than R. R = r(m/M); r~R+r. Consequently:

P = G²M^3/2m^3/2/(r+R)⁴ * sqr(rR)/c = G²M^3/2m^3/2/r⁴ * sqr(r²m/M)/c = G²Mm²/r³/c.

Every planet of Solar System receives the power, which we will name the Laplace power:

P_Laplace = G²Mm²/(r³c).

Let's now investigate the Hubble force.

The space expands: v = Hr. The potential energy of every interacting pair will grow:

dE = GMm/r - GMm/(r+dr).

P_Hubble = dE/dt = GMmdr/r²/dt = GMmdr/r²/dt = GMmv/r² = GMmHr/r² = GMmH/r.

Now we will equal the powers of Laplace and Hubble, and then we will receive the formula for Hubble constant.

P_Hubble = P_Laplace,

GMmH/r = G²Mm²/(r³c).

H = Gm/(r²c).

In this work the exact value of Hubble constant was received by several different methods. By taking this value we'll try to find the radiuses of stable orbits for planets of the Solar System:

r = sqr(Gm/(Hc))

In the bottom there is a table of observable distances of planets to the Sun, and several distances of satellites to their planets. Distances and masses were taken from the NASA web site: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/planetfact.html. One must be careful, because the information about the masses of planets in most old books are different because of the recent change of the recommended value of the gravity constant. Useful information one can also find here: http://www.seds.org/nineplanets/nineplanets/datamax.html
http://galileo.jpl.nasa.gov/jupiter/jupiter.html

Only Mars and Uranus had confirmed the naked formula for the stable radius. If the formula was erroneous then the dispersion of results would be unsystematic. But it clearly visible that received results dropped very near to the numbers 1, 3, 5... This leads us to the conclusion that the Solar System is quantisized. Consequently, the deduced naked formula for stable radiuses must be transformed into the form:

r = sqr(Gm/(Hc))/n.

Where n is quantum (or resonance) number of a planet:
n_Mercury = 3;
n_Venus = 2p or unknown; May be Venus changes its orbit now;
n_Earth = 5;
n_Mars = 1;
n_Jupiter = unknown; Jupiter is unstable, growing planet-star;
n_Saturn = 5;
n_Uran = 1;
n_Neptun = unknown; May be Neptune is leaving the Sun System;
n_Pluto = unknown; Pluto can hardly named a planet, compare it's mass with the masses of planet's satellites.

Quantum numbers of planet's satellites are not known exactly, but it is visible that they also have some order. Besides, it is known that the planet's satellites do not move on stable orbits.

If somebody think that here we have a simple coincidence, let he solve the following problem:

How many times one must through a handful of nine stones in order they dropped as close to the points 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6... as we have received: 3.038; 5.0014; 1.0760; 5.0914; 0.99308; any; any; any; any?

If he compute this probability then he inevitably conclude, that some parameter, which is very close to the value of Hubble constant, is really working in the Solar System. And now tell me, why I must name this value as "some parameter" if I used in the deduction just the Hubble constant; if I used just the properties of the Hubble constant in the deduction? Why I must believe the supporters of the Big Bang model, who says that the Hubble constant does not work inside the galaxies? Now we can see that it works even inside the Solar System; and sustain it from dispersion. And we will see later that it also works inside the atom, because the Hubble constant is one of the main intrinsic characteristics of the space-time.

The power income and expenditure of planets, satellites and the Sun we will compute at the page Dark Energy. Today, 03.21.2002, there is only Russian language page.

This page was last updated: 21 March 2002, by Ivan Gorelik

Back to index: Space Genetics

Extremely urgent note, 2009.

Attention! Magnetic trap of Devil!

There is a very big probability that magnetic trap will kill us all, if we will not stop powerful colliders.

Magnetic trap is an object, unifying hypothetical objects, connected primarily by magnetic forces: neutron drop / liquid; neutron hole; magnetic hole ...

It is probable that the microscopic magnetic trap can be created at the collider. Magnetic trap will grow capturing the normal substance. As a result, magnetic trap can destroy the Earth.

Magnetic hole is a magnetic analog of the black hole. The black hole is bounded by gravitational forces, and the magnetic hole is bounded by magnetic forces, which are many-many times stronger than gravity forces.

Magnetic hole is a magnetic dipole, in the form of a circle, where there is the critical magnetic field. The lines of magnetic induction are directed perpendicular to the plane of the circle. Nucleons are microscopic magnets, and they can be easily captured by the critical field of the hole. As a result the hole is growing.

The approximate computation shows that the minimal possible magnetic hole, which can capture a nucleon, has a mass slightly more than one thousand masses of nucleons. The Tevatron collider is now working near this region (1 TeV). The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will be able to create the particles with the rest mass, which are seven times more that the minimal possible mass of magnetic hole.

According to publications, LHC will create microscopic black holes. Most theorists suggest that these black holes will disappear, because of the Hawking evaporation. However, we know that there are several theories of gravity. Some theories did not even admit the existence of black holes. In addition, there are several theories of black holes. Therefore, confidence in the classical theory of black holes and in a process of evaporation of black holes is very poor.

For several years, some scientists argue and demand to ban the construction of powerful colliders. Among the known dangerous objects that may lead to global catastrophe are the following: microscopic black holes, strangelets, magnetic monopoles, vacuum bubbles. I learned about these disputes and concerns only in early September 2008. And then I immediately noticed that the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, were almost not analyzed.

In early September, I assumed that the probability of a global catastrophe is less than 0.000001. However, after three months of analysis of the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, and after the analysis of space observations, my assessment of the global disaster has surpassed dozens of percents.

Some theorists suggest that the Higgs bosons will be registered at the LHC. And, if these particles will not been found, the theorists would be very surprised; - this would prove that the Standard Model is wrong. Higgs boson had received a new name, "the God particle". We know that the most of particles have their corresponding antiparticles. So, if there is a particle of God, then there is a particle of Devil. Two colliding particles can give two more massive particles, - the particle and its antiparticle, for example, an electron and positron. By adding the colliding energy, we can get the God particle and its anti-particle, the magnetic trap of Devil. Particles and antiparticles have diametrically opposed properties. Indeed, the Higgs boson causes the ordinary matter to have a mass. But the magnetic hole captures the substance and transforms its rest mass-energy into another form of matter, - the magnetic field of the Devil's trap. Say me now, are we have the right to touch the particle of God?

Microscopic magnetic holes created at the collider, will move to the center of the Earth, absorbing the matter in their path. Eventually they will merge together into a single and much stronger magnetic hole. The thin shell of the Earth, together with us, will be ejected into cosmic space, but the rest of the Earth will turn into an electric current loop of several meters radius. For comparison, the radius of a black hole of the same mass is 9 millimeters. Half of Earth’s mass will be transformed into magnetic field of neutron hole, and another half will be transformed into radiation and kinetic energy of the released shell.

Magnetic hole will not decay if it was born in such cold place, as the collider, where the temperature is close to 0 K. If the magnetic hole is born in a collision of space particle with atmospheric particle, it has a speed, which is close to the speed of light. As a result, such magnetic hole will evaporate almost immediately as a result of energetic collisions with atmospheric particles. Such evaporating magnetic hole will form a cosmic-ray particle shower. Such showers are observable.

Huge magnetic holes are also observable is cosmos.

In the remnants of supernova SN 1987A we can see a system of rings, which remind us the magnetic hole. It is possible that this magnetic hole is decaying now.

It seems as if these rings embrace a hyperboloid. And now look at the electron, moving along two hyperboles in coordinates x, ict, in my electron model program. Each electron crosses the entire Universe in a period of time, which is equal to the classical period of the electron. This paradoxical conclusion is the consequence of the Special Relativity Theory. The ring structure of SN 1987A and our electron model have common visible properties. The Earth and the Sun can be turned into the same ring structure.

Magnetic collapse is much more rapid than the gravity collapse. At the process of magnetic collapse the nucleon turns such, that its magnetic dipole moment becomes parallel to the magnetic dipole moment of a trap. Gravity collapse needs displacing of a matter inside the Schwarzschild radius. The time interval of neutrino registration at neutrino observatories had proved the reality of magnetic collapse of dying stars.

Particle's collision energies and bombs:

Several eV - chemical bomb;
Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
Several TeV - hyper bomb.

Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical structure of matter.
Nuclear bomb is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure of matter.
Hyper bomb is accompanied by the transformation of solid matter into a field.

Scientific crime.

Only crazy people can try to create the particles with the rest mass, more than 1000 nucleon masses. It is very possible that in the region from 1000 to 7000 aum, hundreds types of particles and resonances can be created. It is clear, that the most of them will decay. But some of them will grow, capturing the ordinary matter.

Academician Migdal wrote 30 years ago about pion condensation in the strong fields. As a result he had come to conclusion that neutron stars can have any masses. My approximate computation also shows that the minimal possible neutron star can have a mass, about one thousand of nucleon masses. Such embryo of neutron star can by made in collider.

Not long ago the new strange unexpected particle was discovered at the Tevatron collider. It decays at several muons, up to eight units. Somebody had already named it the Halloween particle. I named it the muon hole. What will be made the next? The magnetic trap of Devil? It will not decay, but it will transform us into its magnetic field.

Majority of contemporary physicists imagine quark-gluon plasma as a suck with peas. That is a very dangerous imagination. Particles are not points with labels, where their quantum properties were written. Particles are not the material essences, independent of space-time; they are just space-time elements, strings. 

Dear reader, the situation is extremely serious. The physics now is in the deep crisis. Theorists, in order to save their religious Big Bang theory, invented “the dark energy" as a new either. They want now to test their wretched theories at the powerful Large Hadron Collider.

Those persons, with high ranks and high scientific degrees, who cry about the safety of LHC, had already made a crime now. The LHC was launched despite the fact that there were court trials. The Earth could be exploded the 21 of September 2008, but the accident, which had happened two days earlier, had saved us. Scientists-criminals must be punished. But they continue to lie about the safety of the LHC, and are preparing the global terrorist crime now.

Dear reader! Big Bang adherents can lead the Earth to the utter destruction. Particle collisions with the energy more then 1 TeV must be prohibited by the international law. The science must be cleared from the Big Bang delusion. Big-bangers want to touch the particle of God, but thus, they lead us into the magnetic trap of Devil. People, will you silently endure the massacre?

Some documents and links.

In November 2008, I arrived to Moscow in order to file a lawsuit against the Russian Academy of Sciences and against the most active propagandists/promoters of the LHC launch. Unfortunately, for lack of funds, I still (February 2009) can not to do it.

In late November at the "meeting of four" there was decided to hear my report "What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?" at a workshop in one of the leading institutions of Moscow. But later, I received a "retreat" from this institution

In December, I sent the Letter to the President of Russia. In January, I received an answer in which it was stated that my letter was forwarded to the Russian Academy of Sciences.

In December, I sent the Letters to the Prosecutors Office of the Russian Federation. Soon after, I received the answer stating that my letter "was sent for review in the prescribed manner".

In the end of January I returned to Feodosia (Ukraine) and continued to inform about the risks of the global catastrophe. You can read some letters, which were send to the Google groups, - just click my Google-profile.

Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations. Who are you, dear reader: "a cell of good reason", "a curiosity cell", or "thoughtless muscular cell"?

Magnetic trap of Devil. Recent calculations show that it is not excluded that microscopic magnetic traps were already created, and they are growing now somewhere inside the Earth.

Arguments, proving that "The LHC will lead to global catastrophe"; "Magnetic holes exist"; "We will not be able to prevent the LHC launch and the following global catastrophe". Religious and mystic arguments.

Read the frequently updated page
Save Yourself - The Business Offer
for more news, links and developments of this topic.

The end of Extremely urgent note, 2009.