The Law V.S. The Promise, part 1 (Galatians 3:15-18)

 

"To give a human example, brothers: even with a man-made covenant, no one annuls it or adds to it once it has been ratified. Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, 'And to offsprings,' referring to many, but referring to one, 'And to your offspring,' who is Christ. This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void. For if the inheritance comes by the law, it no longer comes by promise; but God gave it to Abraham by a promise." (Galatians 3:15-18, English Standard Version)

 

The Apostle Paul closes chapter three of Galatians with a very poignant argument to support his thesis that justification is through faith alone in Jesus Christ.  Recall that all throughout chapter three Paul has been presenting arguments to defend the Biblical doctrine of justification against the heresy of legalism.  The first argument was from the believer's experience, and the second argument was from the Old Testament Scriptures.  His third argument (3:15-29) is a contrast between the Law (given to Moses) and the Promise (given to Abraham).

 

This argument has so much content, we're going to spend the next two studies on this passage.  There are four points I want to draw from this passage before us: 1) The nature of a covenant; 2) The specifics of the Abrahamic covenant; 3) The Mosaic Law does not nullify the Abrahamic Covenant; and 4) The inheritance of the promise does not come from the Law.

 

1. The nature of a covenant ("To give a human example, brothers: even with a man-made covenant, no one annuls it or adds to it once it has been ratified"). The dictionary defines "covenant" as: "A binding agreement; a compact." When one thinks of a binding agreement, the word "contract" comes to mind.  Yet, I want to suggest that a covenant is stronger than a contract; at least from a Biblical perspective. In a contract, there are terms that both parties must abide by; failure to do so breaks the contract and frees the non-offending party of any further obligations. A covenant is an agreement between two (or more) parties to perform certain actions regardless of the other party's faithfulness to the covenant. Before Paul goes into the specifics of the Abrahamic covenant, he talks about human covenants in general; and what he says is that once a human covenant has been ratified, no one can add to it or nullify it in any way. Now what holds true for human covenants, holds true for divine covenants as well; even more so.

 

2. The specifics of the Abrahamic covenant ("Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, 'And to offsprings,' referring to many, but referring to one, 'And to your offspring,' who is Christ"). Now the passage says the promises were made to Abraham and his offspring.  This begs the question: What promises? In Genesis 12:1-3, we have God's first revelation of the covenant he makes with Abraham (called "Abram" in this passage): "Now the LORD said to Abram, 'Go from your country and your kindred and your father's house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.'" The promise to Abraham was threefold: A promise of land; a promise of offspring; and a promise of future blessing.

 

Now notice that Paul says the promises were made to Abraham and his offspring. Paul then goes on to reveal that the offspring mentioned is Jesus Christ. In other words, God made these promises to Abraham and to Jesus Christ. The point Paul is trying to make here is that the promise made to Abraham was not nullified when he died because it was made to Jesus too. The Abrahamic covenant is what is known as an everlasting covenant; of which there are five in Scripture (the Noahic Covenant, the Abrahamic Covenant, the Priestly Covenant, the Davidic Covenant, and the New Covenant). This covenant God made with Abraham (and by extension to Jesus Christ) will hold for all time, and can never be broken. It is interesting to note when God ratified the covenant with Abraham, Abraham was asleep; it was like God was saying, "I, and I alone will seal this covenant because I know you are unable keep it (see Genesis 15).

 

3. The Mosaic Law does not nullify the Abrahamic Covenant ("This is what I mean: the law, which came 430 years afterward, does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to make the promise void"). Paul is just using some simple logic here to make this point. If God makes an everlasting covenant to Abraham, is he going to nullify it 430 years later through the law given to Moses? The idea is patently absurd on the face of it. God does not contradict himself ("God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it?" Numbers 23:19). In fact, God cannot lie (Titus 1:2). The Law has a purpose (which we will see next time), but that purpose was not to annul the Abrahamic covenant.

 

4. The inheritance of the promise does not come from the Law ("For if the inheritance comes by the law, it no longer comes by promise; but God gave it to Abraham by a promise"). Here is the main point of this whole passage. The inheritance of the promise (a promise of land; a promise of offspring; and a promise of future blessing) were given to Abraham without any conditions attached. God never said, "Abraham, I will give you land, offspring and blessing if...." The Abrahamic Covenant was unconditional! The Law, on the other hand, is conditional. The Law (otherwise known as the Mosaic Covenant) is the only covenant God made with people that was conditional; material blessings were promised for obedience and curses promised for disobedience. The Mosaic covenant is also the only covenant that was not everlasting (this will be discussed more next time). As mentioned last time, just as law and faith are mutually exclusive, so are the Law and the Promise.

 

Application Time. As we can see, Paul is systematically demolishing the stronghold of legalism. There is no way to support a legalistic mindset from the Old Testament. The blessings we have in Jesus Christ were promised centuries before the Law was even laid down. Not only that, but the promise was laid out in an everlasting covenant that no man can nullify because God stands behind his promises.

 

The Abrahamic Covenant isn't the only promise God has made in Scripture. All of his promises are equally guaranteed. If you're a child of God, then you can stand firm in all of God's promises. Our failure to perfectly keep the law of God in no way removes us from the blessings of God's promises because we're God's children by faith ("But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God." John 1:12).

 

Bottom Line. Why doesn't our inability to keep the law remove us from the blessings of God's promise. Because our faith fulfills the holy requirements of the law: "Do we then overthrow the law by this faith? By no means! On the contrary, we uphold the law" (Romans 3:31).

 

Have a blessed day!

 

Back to “Galatians” page.