Question:

 

I am a relatively recent convert, and I believe the Bible.  But when someone questions me regarding contradictions in the Bible, I’m not sure how to answer.  How do you answer someone who questions the Bible’s credibility?

 

Answer:

 

While I feel that the Christian faith is a rational faith, I understand there are portions that are beyond complete human comprehension.  It's not that they defy logic, but more that the answers are not comprehensible to one with a finite intelligence (such as you and me).  I don't think this hurts Christianity one bit!  If mankind could completely comprehend divine truth, then it wouldn't be divine truth, would it?  In other words, the fact that there are some incomprehensible parts in the Bible lends credence to the fact that the Bible is divine in origin. 

 

Now, if you studied philosophy like I did, you might come back with the fact that there are some human philosophical viewpoints that are incomprehensible (like Nietzsche and Heidegger, I could never understand those crazy German philosophers).  In other words, incomprehensibility doesn't necessitate divine origin.  That's true.  That's why I said it only lends credence (or believability) to the divine origin of the Bible.

 

The Bible gets its credence from several sources:

 

1.    Manuscript evidence:  The New Testament is the most well supported ancient document from that period of history.  There are over 5,000 manuscripts and fragments in the Greek language alone; not to mention other languages such as Latin, Arabic, etc. which bring the total number of manuscripts to over 24,000.  No other document of antiquity approaches this overwhelming attestation of reliability.  The works of Homer (which no reputable scholar questions authentic) has only 600 or so manuscripts.  Not only that, the earliest NT manuscripts are dated reliably to within 100-150 years of the originals.  Compare that to the earliest known copy of Homer's Iliad which is around 1,000 years of the original writing.  What this means is that the earlier a copy is dated to the original, the less the likelihood of fraud and error.  All told, these ancient documents compare to modern day translations of the NT very favorably.  Our modern day Bibles are approximately 99.9% accurate to the ancient manuscripts.  In other words, the Bible you hold in your hands is essentially the unadulterated word of God (the other 0.1% comes in the form of spelling and punctuation variations which do not alter the meaning of any Biblical doctrine.  Besides most good modern translations have copious footnotes).

2.    Archeological evidence:  Briefly, there has been no archeological discovery that has refuted the historical chronology of the Bible.  None!  There are still unanswered questions, but so far to date, the Bible is batting 1.000!

3.    Predictive prophecy:  No other book has the predictive accuracy of the Bible.  The book of Daniel, for example, contains succinct details of the emerging world empires of Persia, Greece and Rome that skeptical scholars have asserted (without proof) that Daniel must have been written much later than most scholars indicate.  Not to mention, all of the OT prophecies concerning Jesus (which were indisputably written before the birth of Christ) attest to the predictive power of the Bible.

4.    Statistical evidence:  Relating to the previous point, what are the mathematical odds that all of the prophecies concerning the life of Jesus could have been fulfilled by one man?  The odds are astronomical (literally bordering on the impossible, you have a much better chance to win three consecutive lotteries) that one man could fulfill every one of those prophecies completely!

5.    Not to mention what Jesus Himself thought of the Bible (i.e., that it is God's infallible, inerrant, authoritative word).

 

I say all this to point out the Bible's overwhelming reliability.  Does this prove that it is the word of God?  No.  But it does present a beyond reasonable doubt argument to its origin and authenticity.  The goal of apologetics isn't to convert people (though it does) to Christianity.  The goal of apologetics is to present a reasonable, rational defense of Christianity so that the skeptic is silenced.  Furthermore, based on the Bible's reliability, if I personally come across something that doesn't make perfect sense to me, I chalk that up to my own limitations.  It might be an issue for further study, or it might be an issue that I'll never resolve in my lifetime.  But I don't for a moment think that because I don't understand something in the Bible it means the Bible is unreliable or illogical.  Incomprehensibility doesn't imply contradictory.

 

Back to Q & A home page.