A R C H A E O L O G Y

HOME

MESOLITHIC

Neolithic

Chalcolithic

   
Exploration   DATING      

            

The word “Archaeology” is derived from Greek `archaios’ meaning “ancient” and `logos’ meaning “knowledge”, it has been therefore variously defined as “the  study of antiquity, the science of ancient things”. It is also defiend as `the study of everything ancient’, and hence archaeology takes every trace of human activity int account. But these definitions have only etymological (science of meaning of the words) significance. It can be more appropriately defined as the “science of ancient remains”. The function of the archaeologist does not end merely with the collection of the ancient remains, but must include an intelligent appreciation and interpretation of these remains. The word “remains” refer to the material relics that the ancient man has left behind. The term “ancient” generally refers to a period when we cannot have that abundance of written historical material.

The scope of Archaeology:

            The main aim of archaeology is to aid in the reconstruction of human past, especially when written records are absent. Even when written records are available, they rarely deal with the activities of common man and his daily life. India has the largest number of inscriptions in the world, but most of these inscriptions are euological (praises) and more importance is given to poetic attainments rather than recording the events for the posterity. They often record land grants and other gifts, and rarely contain references to way of life and the things as they were prevalent in those days.  Because of this fact most of the inscriptions were of no use in reconstructing the social history, though they were useful in studying political history. In such situation archaeologist comes to the aid by filling the gaps with facts unearthed by his spade.

            When the written records are totally absent, archaeology is the only source by which we can know the past human activity. Though man’s cultural past began more than 2 million years ago, when he started using stone artifacts for the first time, written records are available only for the past 5,000 years or so. To probe the human past beyond this 5,000 years, archaeology is the only source. It has been aptly said `where ever man has been on this planet for the last two million years, archaeology can be of use’. Thus archaeologist can best be described  as `detective of the past cultures’.

Beginning of Scientific Archaeology:

            About the beginning of the eighteenth century various scholars started a systematic investigation of the ancient monuments, considering them as the proper sources to supplement the historical evidence of written records. Its pioneer in France was Nicolas de Fabri (1580-1637). Probably first systematic excavation of a city site was undertaken at Pompeii from 1719 onwards, when nobles employed people with the sole aim of collectioning antiquities. Pompeii was buried by eruption of mount Vesuvius in A.D.79. Amaged at the state of preservation, the antique hunters did more archaeological work than the work they were assigned, By the middle of eighteenth century serveral institutions teaching archaeology have come up in France, Germany, Rome, Italy, etc.

Archaeology a Science or Art:

            Archaeology is both science and an art. It is a scientifically ordered branch of knowledge on a certain subject, namely the remains of ancient human activity. It is a science because it brings out some absolute indisputable fact. To that extent it is a science. But, as archaeology deals with human activity, there is possibility of objective and relative thinking, and hence there is possibility of interpretation, which makes it an art as well. Although archaeology can from time to time recover precise knowledge and can thus take its place among the exact sciences, this knowledge is always severely limited. Archaeology is also an art because archaeologist is required to expose carefully the buried remains of the human past.

VALUE OF ARCHAEOLOGY

As a Primary Source: 

Archaeology is the primary source of information for the long period of mans cultural evolution in prehistoric times. It is only due to the sustained efforts of archaeologists that the antiquity of man on the planet could be traced back to two million years. By a systematic study of the tools and fossils embedded in terraces, we are able to see the nature of mans habitat, his implements of defense and offence, the tool techniques and his way of life. The environment of the Stone Age man and his responses and adaptations to the climate have been meticulously reconstructed. For Proto-historic period, though we have some records, they are yet to be satisfactorily deciphered. Hence the proto-historic cultures of India have largely been reconstructed basing on the archaeological evidence. These archaeological studies have pushed back the Indian Civilization back to about 3000 B.C, from the Vedic period. Thus the discovery of Indus Valley Civilization put the Indian subcontinent on par with contemporary Egyptian and Sumerian civilizations. For this the credit solely goes to archaeologists.

As a Supplementary Source:

            Archaeology serves as a valuable supplementary source for historical period. It fills in the gaps that are found in the written records. For example, the information available about the Ikshvaku dynasty that ruled in central Andhra sometime in the second half of 3rd century A.D. was extremely scrappy, till the excavations at their capital Vijayapuri revealed their religious patronage, secular structure, town planning etc. Similarly, excavations at Arikamedu, Kaveripattanam and Satanikota have revealed trade contacts with Romans in the early centuries of the Christian Era. The submerged city of Dwaraka, mentioned in great epic Mahabharat could be identified only because of consistent efforts of the archaeologists. Thus the information in the written records could be verified by means of archaeology.

Common Man’s History:

            Another valuable contribution of archaeology is in the reconstruction of common man’s history. Most of the historical documents and inscriptions pertain more to the upper class of the society, whereas the excavations often bring to light the residences of the common man and the objects used by them. At Lothal, the entire workshop and the equipment of the bead makers was laid bare. At Nagarjunakonda goldsmiths work-shop with all the tools was discovered. The agricultural equipment, the carpenters tools and objects of kitchen and daily-life are found in the excavations which help us in reconstructing the structure and way of life of the society. We rarely find such information in written records.

  Rescue Archaeology:

            Several remarkable sites and monuments have been recorded and preserved for posterity because of the efforts of archaeologists, from the areas threatened by submergence under dam areas and from modern town constructions. Even sits threatened by natural calamities also have been taken care of. To quote few examples the rescue archaeological work done in the submersible area under the Aswan dam project in Egypt and Nagarjunakonda or Srisailam projects in  Andhra Pradesh are well known. Nagarjunakonda developed as a major tourist centre after the excavations done to salvage arcahaeological wealth threatened by submergence. The future generations will always be thankful for the transplantation of remarkable group of temlples at Alampur (Kurnool Dt.) threatened by submergence under Srisailam reservoir. Similar rescue archaeological work is now going on in the submersible area under the Narmadasagar project in Madhya Prades and Gujarat.

Scientific Outlook:

            Since archaeology provides stratified account of the artifacts and material achievements, we can have a fairly correct assessment of the progress of technology and material  culture. Imaginary or exaggerated view of the written records give place to a more factual account of the past cultures. When literature gives a glorified pictue of the material prosperity of an ancient town or a kingdom, the archaeological work may act as a corrective source to such distinctions.

                         ARCHAEOLOGY AND OTHER SUBJECTS

ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY:

            Archaeology often greatly helps in reconstructing history. In fact it is the only source for the reconstruction of the human past in the prehistoric times. Though we find ample number of written records for reconstruction of the historical period, they may not always present a full view of the past happenings. There would be a number of missing links in the history, which have to be reconstructed for a better understanding of the human past. Archaeology comes to the risk by supplying information to fill these gaps. Apart from filling gaps in the information available, archaeology also helps in correcting the information obtained through the written records. Most of the written records contain euological phrases which many a time proved to wrong. For example most of the inscriptions describe a king as `Maha Rajadhi Raja’, `Raja Paramesvara’, `chakravartin’ etc., which on verification prove to be highly exaggerated. Apart from helping in the reconstruction of political history, archaeology also helps greatly in studying social history, providing an insight into the common man and his ways of life. Usually written records made by him. They do not mention anything about the common man and the failures of the rulers. In such situations information collected by archaeological means are very useful. Another advantage of the information obtained through archaeological  means over the written records is the authenticity of the information. The archaeological information being direct evidence is indisputable. Thus archaeology greatly helps in reconstructing the human past both of prehistoric and historic times.

ARCHAEOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY:

            Both archaeology and anthropology are connected with human beings, whether in the past or the present. Large quantities of bones of human  beings as well as of animals are found in the excavations. Anthropologists are always associated with the archaeological excavations to study the bones and assess the racial composition, age, sex, nature of death, etc. A careful examination of the teeth at Mahurjhari in Vidarbha has revealed  smoking habit of the people residing there some 2500 years ago. Likewise study of stature and wearing of the joints have  helped  in understanding their way of like. All these results  could be obtained only by associating anthropologists in the study of material unearthed in archaeological excavations. The traditions and customs of the people die hard. The traditions which are observed by many communities today have their origins in the past. For example in central India, on a particular day women worship rice shoots planted on a plaque of mud. A similar custom was depicted on an Indus Valley seal which is more than 4000 years old, revealing the continuation of this custom from those days to the present period. There are scores of such customs especially in connection with birth rites, marriage ceremonies and funerary customs. An archaeologist can understand the evidence unearthed better by having knowledge of such customs and traditions as practiced today. In fact, of these lines a subject known as `Ehnoarchaeology’ has developed in recent years. These are only few examples, how anthropology and archaeology are interrelated. There are numerous other aspects which could be studied by archaeologists by associating anthropologists in the investigations.

ARCHAEOLOGY AND OTHER SCIENCES:

            The responsibility of archaeologist does not end with the collection of few antiquities from an excavated site. The real task of piecing together the past stars with the analysis and study of the material thus collected in the field, with the help of other scientists, anthropologists, botanists, zoologists and all other branches of sciences and humanities. Hence archaeology has intricate and unalienable relationship  with several other subjects.

            Archaeology concerns with every past human activity. So it has to take into consideration every aspect and evidence, however trifle it may be. The reconstruction of human past by means of archaeology is similar to investigating a criminal case with the meagre clues available. In the process archaeology has to depend on so many other sciences. It is not wrong to say that almost every scientific and technological breakthrough has some of the other application in archaeological investigations. Nuclear Physics in dating, photography in recording, aerial photography in exploration, chemistry in cleaining and preservation are some of the few aspects where sceince come to the aid of archeological study. Even the recent advances in the computer electronics are helping greatly the archaeologists the information obtained in the field.

PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY:

            Archaeology greatly depends on the principles and methods of Physics and Chemistry. For examples photography which is a combination of physics and chemistry helps to a large extent in archaeological studies. It is the  easiest  and most reliable method of recording. Another aspect of physics principles coming to  the aid of archaeology is in conservation of the old mountains where the stress aspects on the lines of physical principles have to be studied. Most important contributions of this studies to archaeology is dating the objects by physical (nuclear) and chemical methods like C-14, Potassium-Argon, Thermoluminescence, Archaeomagnetic dating techniques. We cannot underestimate the role of chemistry in cleaning and preservation of antiquities and ancient monuments. In fact a branch known as `archaeological chemistry’ has developed in recent years. Apart from this X-rays, electronics, aviation and almost all advances made in science have contributed greatly in archaeological studies.

GEOLOGY AND GEOGRAPHY:

            Archaeology greatly depends on the geology and geographical studies in the investigations. The study of prehistoric cultures up to the Mesolithic age greatly depend on geological Ice ages and terrace formations for evolutionary and chnological estimations. In fact the principles of stratigraphical dating method universally applied in archaeological investigation have been borrowed from geology.

            Geology and geographical factors greatly influence the people of the region and their ways of life. Knowledge of different rocks and minerals is essential to understand the use of these different material in the production of tools, ornaments, and house-hold articles. An archaeologist should be able to distinguish different materials like granite, sand stone, quatizite, limestone, laterite, chalcedoney, agate, chert, jasper, carnelian, steatite, etc. Whereas quartzite was more preferred in the Palaeolithic period, chalcedoney, chert, agate, jasper etc were preferred in the Mesolithic and Chalcolithic periods. Similarly dolerite, dike and trap rock was preferred in the production of Neolithic period. Preference for different rock material also varies in house, temple and grave construction. For example in Cuddapah, Kurnool and Chittoor districts, where lime stone slabs of Cuddapah series are available in plenty, the houses are constructed using this  slabs and we find less use bricks. Similarly in Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu we come across more cist burials of megalithic period utilising slabs in the construction. But in Vidarbha, in the same period pit burials were more prevalent as material for slab production was not available.

            The archaeological features effect the physical features of the living organisms including human beings. For example, the mongoloid short features of the Tibeteans are brought about by the hight altitude of the Himalayan montain system. Similarly, the way of life of the people is also greatly influenced by the geological and geographical features. For example people living in the  coasts consume more fish while the people in the interior lands depend mor on game items. Similarly, the coastal people cultivate rice extensively due to the availability of water whereas the people in the mid upper lands cultivate pulses and cereals which are rain dependent. An archaeologist should have a good background of such factors which are influence d by the geology and geographical features, to have better understanding of the ancient cultures.

HOME              
1