Debate and
research on changing disesel fuel to lower emissions has focused on several
fuel
specifications, namely:
1. Cetane level;
2. aromatics content;
3. fuel density;
4. distillation characteristics (T90 and T95);
5. oxygenates content; and
6. sulfur content.
Control of
these parameters may have the potential to provide direct benefits by incrementally
lowering emissions whens the fuel is burned, although
the benefit may vary depending on the sophis-
tication of the engine technology involved.
Much of the
available data... is for heavy-duty engines...These engines depend on exhaust
gas
recirculation (EGR) and optimization of engine
design...The result of this study showed these eng- ines were mostly
insensitive to these [above-named] parameters... with reduced NOx emissions
by only 10% due to a reduction in fuel density and aromatics content. Another
study (EPEFE Report )
for both light- and heavy-duty diesels showed the largest
impact on particulate emissions (by only
7% overall) were from lowering T95 and fuel density.
Increasing the cetane number was found to
have no observable benefit... except on older-technology
engines. The addition of oxygenates to
diesel fuel must be considered tentative "pending further
investigative work."
Desulfurization of diesel fuel
According to
this report, "reducing the sulfur content of diesel fuel has the potential
to provide
large indirect technology-enabling benefits in addition
to some amount of direct emission benefits. In
fact, "sulfur reduction appears to be the only
fuel change with potential to enable new technologies
needed to meet Tier 2 light-duty or anticipated future
heavy-duty standards." EPA-USA avers :
"at this point, we believe that sulfur-control is the
most likely means of achieving cost-effective diesel
fuel emission reductions."
Potential Benefits of Reducing Sulfur
Diesel fuel desulfurization should be evaluated primarily for its potential
to
enable new engine and aftertreatment technologies . These so-called
sulfur-sensitive technologies may be categorized
as follows:
1. electronically-controlled EGR as a means of reducing NOx emissions
by as
much as 90% (especially for heavy-duty engines);
2. various types of catalysts/catalytic converters (either active
or passive types) for
removal of NOx by 15-30% on the average;
3. exhaust aftertreatment by the use of a ceramic or metallic filter (sometimes
called
a 'soot filter'), or a particulate (PM) trap;
4. oxidation catalysts, which reduce exhaust PM by removal of volatile
organics and
hydrocarbons, using precious metals such as platinum;
5. SCRs (selective catalytic reduction) for 70-90% NOx reductions in stationary
engines but now being experimentally tested for mobile applications, utilising
mix-
ture of urea and water;
6. NOx storage catalyst system with a potential to reduce NOx by
50-75%; and
7. continuously regenerating PM filter for light-duty application
where the potential
for PM reduction is estimated at 80% or more.