As you will see, some of the information forms part of our current exhibition at The Edge, From Nuclear Bombs to Nuclear Bullets. The exhibition also features the work of Carole Gallagher, who has documented the effects of the US nuclear weapons testing program on the population of Utah.
Our part of the exhibition marks the beginning of our project to find out more about the testing, combat use, and possible health hazards of DU weapons. The exhibition will be added to as we get new information to present. We are also building up a collection of source documents and reports relating to DU. The possible hazards of DU use are a matter of considerable controversy - I would appreciate your comments on what we have managed to find out so far.
The next part of the project is to organise a symposium on the use of DU with doctors, scientists, environmentalists, and journalists in Britain. We plan to invite the Iraqi Society for Environmental Protection and Improvement to contribute to the symposium. We believe that the hazards of DU can only be evaluated by free discussion and debate amongst scientists and doctors. Iraq's international isolation and the UN blockade is preventing that.
Other plans for the project include getting a filmed documentary on DU made, and the possibility of editing a book about DU, with contributions from other researchers, journalists, doctors, and environmental scientists to supplement our own work. We are also planning to put this information, as well as other details about the effects of sanctions on Iraq onto the Internet. Initially we plan to put our exhibitions about Iraq and the Gulf War, along with related material on the World Wide Web. Photographs and text can be shown, along with links to other parts of the Internet that are of interest.
We do not just want to record our exhibitions however. The Internet can also be used to link with other photography and documentary galleries across the world, to conduct further research on issues that we are working on, to initiate discussion and debate our work.
I hope that you are able to join The Edge in taking this important work further. I am very keen to hear of any information on DU you may be able to offer, such as further reports and documentation.
In particular, we want as many people as possible to be involved in the symposium we are planning. If there is any way you can help - suggesting others to contact, helping with fundraising, publicising the symposium - please let me know. I would also urge you to work with The Edge to bring the documentary and book projects to fruition.
Operation Desert Storm was promoted as a 'clean' war on the allied side yet these highly toxic and radioactive 'nuclear bullets' were used by the British and American armies. The Gulf War was the first opportunity that the US and British forces had to test their DU weapons in combat conditions. They have contaminated Iraq's soil and water table with toxic and carcinogenic dust that will last 4,500million years. The dust released from these uranium tipped shells as they explode causes genetic damage and has been linked to rises in childhood cancers in Iraq since the Gulf War.
The population of Iraq has never been informed of the hazard, nor offered compensation or measures to protect themselves. Britain and America have continued to cloak the development of these weapons and their hazardous nature in secrecy, and the facts about the impact of depleted uranium shells in Iraq remain hidden behind the system of United Nations sanctions which continue to cut off Iraq from the rest of the world.
We have collected documents and accounts from Gulf War veterans, doctors,scientists, and environmentalists from America, Holland, Iraq and Britain. We have made two field trips to Iraq to gather information. We are extending this exhibition by creating a Web page that brings together our work and that of people abroad. This presentation, the information we have collected, and the new material we are gathering will be put onto the Internet for international use.
The Edge gallery are also inviting the Iraqi Society for Environmental Protection and Improvement to Britain, for a symposium to highlight the consequences of using DU weapons. Under UN sanctions it is difficult to accurately assess the extent of DU contamination and it's effects, let alone do anything about it. The pariah status of Iraq means that the findings of Iraqi doctors are never discussed, and remain within the country. In turn they have little access to international medical debate and innovation. The hazards of DU can only be evaluated by free discussion and debate amongst scientists and doctors. Iraq's international isolation and the United Nations sanctions on the country are preventing that. We welcome any assistance to our ongoing work on this subject.
DU is two and a half times denser than steel and a DU projectile provides maximum penetrative power because it concentrates phenomenal mass onto a single point. On penetrating a tank or armoured vehicle, as James Ridgeway of The Village Voice explains, a DU shell 'bursts into flame and all but liquifies, searing through armour like a white hot phosphorescent flare. The heat of the shell causes any diesel vapours in the enemy tank to explode, and the crew inside is burnt alive'. DU weapons are also cheap to manufacture - the DU waste from the uranium enrichment process waste is practically given away to munitions manufacturers by the US Department of Energy.
In addition to its immediate destructive effects DU also creates long-term health problems. DU explosions create microscopic airborne particles which can spread across kilometre-wide areas. They are sufficiently soluble to contaminate soil, ground water and surface water. When ingested DU accumulates in the bones and kidneys and like lead is permanently deposited. It causes irreversible damage to the kidneys and the growth of tumours. DU crosses the placenta during pregnancy - children are particularly vulnerable to it's toxic effects because their cells are dividing rapidly as they grow. When inhaled toxic and radioactive particles are trapped permanently in the lungs increasing the risk of cancer.
We have never been told that radiological weapons were used during the Gulf conflict. We only found out by reading reports in the foreign press - The Independent from Britain, an article by Eric Hoskins in the New York Times, and in the Harvard Study Team's report of public health after the Gulf War. We established a survey team at the beginning of 1993. But during 1993 we found no proof. We were interested in the road between Kuwait and Safwan, which was heavily attacked in the last 3 days of the conflict. But in fact most of the destroyed tanks were in Kuwait. It's hard to find where contaminated material could be found, after the war we moved the destroyed tanks and cleared a lot of the battlefield debris.
At this time the Deputy Minister of Information in Kuwait announced that they had found DU shells. It was conveyed on the Middle East broadcasting agency. Then 2 weeks later he denied it. Although we hadn't found any proof of DU use, we knew that there was a problem that must have something to do with the war. Doctors were reporting seeing many new, strange diseases - especially in children. There was also a sharp rise in defects in sheep. Leukemia used to be the seventh most common cancer, in 1989. In 1993 it had become the fourth highest cancer.
In September and October 1994 we looked again for DU. This time we looked in areas where there had been Republican Guard battles. This was further west than the main front-line battles. We found contaminated Iraqi tanks and unexploded DU rounds. Samples from destroyed tanks and armour were taken and analyzed - they were found positive. We found DU bullets near an oil pumping station by the border with Saudi Arabia, and on the Iraqi side of the Demilitarised Zone. We now had proof that DU had been used during the war.
No-one knows what the effect of these weapons are - when you fire one bullet, and when you fire 940,000 bullets on one road in three days, that's something different. In a battlefield, people are running around, everything is confused, inhaling this radioactive material. It is difficult to find a specific group who may be effected - the troops who fought in the war have now returned back into the civilian population. The soldiers of today did not fight in the war.
Recently, your MP, [Sir] David Steel, sent a letter to The Ministry of Defence about the use of DU. He got a reply which says the British used 80 rounds. This is the first time they have admitted its use. We don't know what has been used, or where. If the [US] Department of Defense, or the Ministry of Defence told us, then we could begin to identify the problem. At the moment we just don't know.'
"After the war we noticed two things, firstly that although we were receiving fewer patients we still had an increasing numbers of malformations and genetic disease. We were also seeing the appearance of new cases, not seen before the war. Students, from Basra teaching centre, preparing paediatric dissertations were investigating malformations in the south of the country. They also noted an increase in these malformations. I prepared a paper which compared pre-war studies with post war studies. We also went back to the patients registries - despite the lower attendance at clinics today for non-medical reasons. My paper confirmed the students findings - there has been an increase in malformations since the war.
Many of the new malformations, are defects in limbs [phocomelia]. These kind of cases were reported in the early 50's, as a result of pregnant women taking Thalidomide. But we hadn't seen cases since then. Since the war we are seeing these patients, but we cannot be sure why. We don't know what they have dropped on us - we are suspicious of everything now, wether it's the environment, our water, air, or earth."
Another study by Dr. Barnouti and Dr Al-Tawil has identified a significant increase in seminal fluid abnormalities in a group of patients tested at their clinic before and after the war. We spoke to Dr. Al-Tawil to ask him if further medical studies were planned.
"There are many problems conducting a study into the long-term health effects of the war. We have no figures from the northern three governorate, which are out of central government control. There have been big population shifts since the war - many people from Basra have moved to Kerbala and Najav.
The effect of sanctions means that it is very difficult to collect reliable figures. We have done a cross-sectional study - it is a snapshot of the incidence of diseases by comparing figures before and after the war - we started collecting data in 1993. Despite the lack of the north we are still seeing sharp increases in disease compared to before the war. We need to do a prospective study - to compare a group that have been exposed to these weapons and a group that have not been exposed. You then follow these groups for at least two years, assess who has what.
This requires a lot of time and money, and we simply don't have the resources to do this, never mind overcome the obstacles thrown up by the war. We are hoping to do a case control study. This involves studying cases that are available - to go back through their history to find out if they were exposed or not, and compare to a control group. But still, resources are hard to find."
There have also been increases in reported cases of leukemia. In Basra province for instance, in the south of the country where DU contamination has been found, leukemia rates have risen by 56%, according to a study by Dr. Muna Elhassani of the Iraqi Cancer Registry. Severe shortages in cytotoxic and most other drugs hampers the treatment of victims of leukemia and other cancers.
Depleted uranium (DU) is two and a half times denser than steel, and one and a half times denser than lead. The density of DU makes it possible to have a smaller bullet with the same mass as before but with less air-drag, so giving a higher velocity and extended range. A DU projectile provides maximum penetrative power because it concentrates phenomenal weight onto a single point. It's armour piercing capacity was amply demonstrated during the Gulf War.
The two main anti-tank weapons made of DU are the 120mm cannon shell used by the US armies M1A1 Abrams tank, and 30mm bullets used by A-10 anti-tank aircraft. DU weapons are also used by Britain's Challenger tank, and the US and British navies' Phalanx gun systems. Depleted uranium is the waste product from the uranium enrichment process when producing reactor fuel and nuclear warheads. The stockpiles of DU built up by the nuclear industry provide cheap material for munitions production, whilst sparing the nuclear industry the headache and expense of long-term storage. Instead they are able to dump their nuclear waste on another country during wartime.
DU weapons are also cheap to manufacture. The DU waste is practically given away to munitions manufacturers. The American Department of Energy says it "is seeking expressions of interest from firms which would be interested in acquiring , at no cost for the material, depleted and normal uranium... that could be useful in other applications"1
DU is both toxic and radioactive. In the United States, community and environmental groups have campaigned against facilities to manufacture and test DU weapons since the early eighties. The first use of DU weapons in combat during the Gulf War have raised fears about the long term health and environmental damage caused by DU in the Gulf region.
It is 99.7% non-fissionable U-238. About 5-10 kg. of DU is produced for every 1 kg of low enriched uranium for nuclear power plants. Whilst less radioactive than natural uranium, it is pyrophoric (capable of igniting spontaneously) and of exceptional density.
For decades scientists have debated what to do with this nuclear waste - it has been suggested that it should be sent into space or buried at the bottom of the sea. Current plans are to put DU into deep underground storage, such as the controversial NIREX dump at Sellafield. The Handbook of Chemistry and Physics notes 'new uses are being found for depleted uranium... uranium and it's compounds are highly toxic, from both a chemical and radiological standpoint.'2 According to one writer, the use of DU in weapons which can be spread around the test ranges and battlefields of the world is, 'an ingenious solution to the nuclear industry's paralysing problem of what to do with nuclear waste'3.
Why is DU defined as conventional? By any criteria it fits the definition of a chemical and radiological weapon. In Britain and America when DU is produced as a by-product of uranium enrichment it is classified as nuclear waste. When it is turned into a bullet and fired at Iraq it becomes 'conventional'.
On penetrating a tank or armoured vehicle a DU shell 'bursts into flame and all but liquefies, searing through armour like a white hot phosphorescent flare. The heat of the shell causes any diesel vapours in the enemy tank to explode, and the crew inside is burnt alive'.7 How much depleted uranium was used may never be known but it has been estimated that the Allies fired between 5,000 - 6,000 DU tank rounds and 940,000 bullets from aircraft such as the A10.8
A secret report by Britain's Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA), revealed by The Independent, estimated that the Allies had left at least 40 tonnes of DU, enough to cause '500,000 potential deaths'. Whilst stressing that this was only a theoretical figure, they say that the sheer volume of DU left in Kuwait and Iraq 'indicates a significant problem'.
The report explains that 'There will be specific areas in which many rounds have been fired where localised contamination of vehicles and soil may exceed permissible limits and these could be hazardous to both clean up teams and the local population. Furthermore, if DU gets into the food chain or water this will create potential health problems'9. Using documents obtained under the American Freedom of Information Act, American Greenpeace estimate that there are over 300 tons of DU left in northern Kuwait and southern Iraq10, whilst the LAKA Foundation of Amsterdam sets the figure at 700 tons.11 It is claimed the dust released from these uranium tipped shells as they explode causes genetic damage.
DU contamination has been linked to rises in childhood cancers in Iraq since the Gulf War. The population of Iraq has never been informed of the hazard, nor offered compensation or measures to protect themselves.
Nuclear Metals Incorporated (NMI), in Concord, Massachusetts, is one of the largest DU weapons manufacturers. It is currently licensed to possess 3300 tons of DU. In April 1991 Citizens Concerned about NMI asked Radioactive Waste Management Associates to study the health and safety impact on the local population around the plant. Past operations at MNI had led to contamination of both surface and groundwater sources.
Radioactive Waste Management Associates concluded that probability of cancer near the NMI facility could expected to be higher due to inhalation of uranium. The AuSable Manistee Action Council (AMAC) has been trying to determine the level of contamination at a firing range used by A-10 aircraft at Camp Grayling, Michigan. They have not yet received a reply to their concerns from the state government.
Citizen Alert, a Nevada environmental group, who have helped to produce the valuable report Uranium Battlefields Home and Abroad: Depleted Uranium Use by US Department of Defense have campaigned against the awarding of a licence to Nellis Air Force Base, in southern Nevada, to use DU weapons.
Home on the Range Inc. a citizens group protesting at the expansion of military airspace in North Carolina forced the US Marine Corps to admit that between 1982 and 1986 over 300,000 30mm DU rounds had been expended in North Carolina alone. Other DU munitions plants in Ohio and Oklahoma have been scheduled for shutdown following community protests at release of DU contamination.12
He notes that 'Until these doses can be related to a cancer risk factor, they must be viewed as qualitative indicators of danger, as red flags... the younger the person exposed to alpha particle radiation, the greater the risk that cancer will develop.' In both 1987 and 1990, the US Army issued guidelines on the handling of DU munitions and DU contaminated vehicles. It includes instructions to fire-fighters that they must wear 'self contained breathing apparatus, protective clothing, and gloves when approaching a burning tank... to approach the tank it should be upwind of any smoke coming from the tank''14 No such guidelines have been passed to Iraq. (see DU use during the Gulf War)
In July 1992, Professor Gunter of the Albert Schweitzer Institute, brought back to Germany a DU shell he had found in Iraq. He was arrested and accused of 'illegally releasing ionising radiation'. The radioactivity of the shell was confirmed by two laboratories, and it was sealed in a lead lined box. There are no lead lined boxes for the people of Iraq and Kuwait.
When inhaled, tiny DU particles can lodge in the lung, causing cancers. 'Unlike an X-ray, which provides a brief exposure, the radiation from uranium continues to assault the body's cells and their nuclei'.15 When ingested DU accumulates in the bones and kidneys and like lead is permanently deposited. It causes irreversible damage to the kidneys and the growth of tumours. DU crosses the placenta during pregnancy - foetuses are particularly vulnerable to it's toxic effects because their cells are dividing rapidly as they grow. In May 1991 the US Defence Department admitted that the military use of DU results in 'the potential to cause adverse impacts on human health, primarily through the water pathway.'16
The Iraqi Society for Environmental Protection and Improvement (ISEPI) has verified the presence of DU contamination in the south of Iraq. They are trying to establish the long term health and environmental consequences of the Gulf War on Iraq.
Collecting hard statistical evidence in Iraq has become increasingly difficult under sanctions. Health studies are made harder still by the fact that far fewer people seek medical care than before the war, when there was 97% urban and 70% rural access to modern healthcare.17 Today, sanctions have brought the healthcare system to the point of collapse. Nevertheless, there are published medical studies which record a rise in cases of childhood cancers, birth defects and abnormalities, and increases in male infertility - especially in the contaminated south of Iraq.
Dr. Selma Al-Taha, Consultant Geneticist at the University of Baghdad, says 'Limb reductional abnormalities [phocomelia - abnormalities which used to associated with Thalidomide] have not been recorded in the pre-war studies, but this study, as well as others, in 1994, have shown the occurrence of such cases in their results.'18 Her study, of babies up to 2 years old, shows an increase in genetic abnormalities in patients referred to the only two genetic clinics in Iraq.
There have also been increases in reported cases of leukaemia. In Basra province for instance, in the south of the country where DU contamination has been found, leukaemia rates have risen by 56%, according to a study by Dr. Muna Elhassani of the Iraqi Cancer Registry. Another study by Dr. Barnouti and Dr Al-Tawil has identified a significant increase in seminal fluid abnormalities in a group of patients tested at their clinic before and after the war.
The Edge gallery are inviting the Iraqi Society for Environmental Protection and Improvement to Britain, for a symposium to highlight the consequences of using DU. The hazards of DU can only be evaluated by free discussion and debate amongst scientists and doctors. Iraq's international isolation and the United Nations sanctions on the country are preventing that.
Leonard Dietz writes: I believe it is accurate to say that the DU penetrator is the most significant battlefield weapon developed since the machine gun and its widespread use with devastating results to infantry soldiers during World War 1. Similarly, DU penetrators have revolutionised modern land warfare, which relies heavily on large numbers of tanks and armoured vehicles. The mechanised armies of all third-world nations now are potential scrap iron'21 DU weapons have become increasingly popular with Western armies.
The International Defence Review reports that 'following a lead first set up by the US in the mid-70's, the British, French and Russian development communities are becoming progressively more wedded to DU, though the Germans and Israelis have elected to stay firmly out.' 22
The Gulf War of 1991 was presented as a war for democracy - a war for the liberation of Kuwait, and to oppose the tyranny of Saddam Hussein. Iraq was presented as well armed, ruthless, and a threat to peace and democracy throughout the Middle East, and indeed the entire world.
Far from being a war of liberation, the Gulf War was a contest for Western moral legitimacy that required the criminalisation of Iraq. Whilst setting up Iraq as the menace to peace and democracy the West was establishing it's own moral authority as the only force to ensure stability in the post Cold War world. Amid economic slump, the decline of traditional institutions, and the breakdown of the post-war order there is little more than moral authority for Western governments to turn to.
The scare stories, panics, and propaganda used to smear Iraq in most cases rest on little or no evidence. For instance, it was simply not true that Iraq possessed, or was about to get hold of, nuclear weapons. Inspection teams from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have never found a nuclear bomb, or evidence that one exists. Despite the large sums of money that Iraq spent on nuclear research, it was still many years away from producing even one small atomic weapon, and independent studies of Iraq's nuclear facilities point out that most assumptions of their future nuclear plans are improbably optimistic, based on the progress of America's Manhattan Project during World War 2, rather than the experience of a third world country, that has had to import most of it's technology from the West.(1)
However, facts did not prevent newspapers like the Sunday Times presenting a series of contradictory 'exclusives' claiming to reveal the hidden truth about Iraq's weapons. On the 28 November 1990 they headlined a story "Iraq may have a nuclear capacity in two months"(2). Three weeks later a front page article informed us "Iraq is Two Years away from Nuclear Bomb"(3). A curt dismissal of their previous projection was buried at the bottom of the article.
The tales of Saddam's nuclear arsenal came from American military intelligence reports, written for public consumption. As the Sunday Times itself freely admitted, an opinion poll conducted in America showed that only 31% of those interviewed would support a war to defend US interests in the region such as oil, but a majority thought the war would be justified to prevent Iraq getting the bomb.(4) From then on the nuclear, chemical, and military threat posed by Iraq became the No. 1 story of the Gulf War.
Despite the this lack of evidence there was very little criticism of the West's claims against Iraq, demonstrating the strength of Western chauvinism and the anti third world consensus that rules today. However bizarre and contradictory these stories became, people were prepared to believe anything about Iraq.
Even the critics of government policy accept the moral parameters set. In Britain, the Scott Inquiry is investigating government ministers at the highest levels for illicit arms sales to Iraq before the Gulf War. Yet all commentators, however critical, see the selling of arms to Iraq as the central problem, not Britain's own arsenal, which it readily used during the Gulf War. Ministers are criticised for lying to Parliament, but not for bombing Iraq back to a pre-industrial age.
The need to stop the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction became a central argument in the demonising of Iraq and justifying the Gulf War. Yet accepting the obsession with proliferation obscures who is really to blame for conflict and destruction in the Middle East. It is the West that has the real arsenal of 'weapons of mass destruction', and the ruthlessness to use them.
Radioactive 'nuclear bullets', made with waste uranium from the nuclear industry, were used during the Gulf War. They have contaminated Iraq's soil and water table with toxic and carcinogenic dust that will last 4,500 million years. The dust released from these uranium tipped shells as they explode causes genetic damage and has been linked to the rise in childhood cancers in Iraq since the Gulf War. The population of Iraq has never been informed of the hazard, nor offered compensation or measures to protect themselves.
In recent months the West has made clear it is prepared to drop the bomb on North Korea. As in the case of Iraq, the obsession with the possibility of North Korea developing a nuclear capability ignores both the massive nuclear arsenal possessed by the USA (the only country to have used the bomb), and Bill Clinton's threat to 'annihilate' North Korea with very real nuclear weapons.(5)
Having criminalised Iraq through the scare stories of proliferation, the West gained the moral authority to destroy it.
Whilst Iraq was accused of a nonexistent nuclear arsenal, the West were using weapons such as cluster bombs, napalm, fuel air explosives, and depleted uranium in addition to it's awesome conventional firepower.
The development of DU weapons by the US military began in the 1970's(6), with Britain starting test firing of DU weapons in 1980(7). The most important quality of DU is it's extreme density. DU is two and a half to three times as heavy as steel. This density allows DU missiles to travel a 40-kilometre range at a velocity of 1500 meters per second - four times the speed of conventional large-calibre shells.
A DU projectile provides maximum penetrative power because it can concentrate phenomenal weight on a single point. It's armour piercing capacity is spectacular. US A10 'tankbuster' pilots who fired DU missiles on Iraqi tanks during the Gulf War called it 'plinking' - slang for shooting tin cans. DU is also pyrophoric - small particles of DU burn spontaneously in oxygen. On impact with a tank or armoured vehicle a DU shell fragments and ignites, enhancing it's destructive power - it sets the ammunition and fuel on fire burning tank crews alive.
An additional attraction of DU is it's cheapness. The stockpiles of DU built up by the nuclear industry provide cheap material for munitions production, whilst sparing the nuclear industry the headache and expense of long-term storage. Instead they are able to dump their nuclear waste on a third world country.
The Gulf War of 1991 was the first opportunity that the US and British forces had to test their DU weapons in combat conditions. How much depleted uranium was used may never be known but it has been estimated that the Allies fired between 5,000 - 6,000 DU tank rounds(8) and 940,000 bullets from aircraft such as the A10(9).
However, even more worrying than the immediate destructive effects of DU weapons, is the long-term health risks associated with DU and it's use in munitions.
Pyrophoric explosions create microscopic airborne particles which can spread across kilometre-wide areas. They are sufficiently soluble to contaminate soil, groundwater and surface water. These microscopic, radioactive heavy metal particles (DU and daughter products like beryllium) can enter the body through ingestion and inhalation. When ingested DU accumulates in the bones and kidneys and like lead is permanently deposited. It causes irreversible damage to the kidneys and the growth of tumours. DU crosses the placenta during pregnancy - children are particularly vulnerable to it's toxic effects because their cells are dividing rapidly as they grow.
When inhaled DU can also enter the body through the lungs. Some of these particles will be trapped there permanently and increase the risk of cancer. Others will settle in the bones and the bloodstream with the results mentioned above.
The toxic affects of DU are challenged by the military authorities, but in May 1991 the US Defense Department admitted that the military use of DU results in "...the potential to cause adverse impacts on human health, primarily through the water pathway."(10)
A secret report by Britain's Atomic Energy Authority, revealed by The Independent, estimated that the Allies had left at least 40 tonnes of DU, enough to cause "500,000 potential deaths", and that the sheer volume of DU left in Kuwait and Iraq "indicates a significant problem" (11). Other researchers have estimated that up to 300 tonnes of depleted uranium weapons may have been left on the battlefields.
The military refuse to classify DU as a 'radiological weapon' (12), claiming it is only slightly radioactive. Nevertheless, when Siegwart Gunther, medical director of the Albert Scheitzer Institute arrived in Berlin in July 1992, carrying a spent DU round retrieved from Iraq, he was charged with illegally "releasing ionising radiation". The shell, it's radioactivity confirmed by two independent German laboratories, was quickly sealed in a lead-lined box. There are few lead lined boxes in Iraq. Recent reports from aid workers and doctors working in Iraq have spoken of many new illnesses amongst children in Iraq. UN personnel and aid workers have seen children playing with empty shells and destroyed tanks in the former battlefields. These weapons have been linked to the rise in childhood cancers in these areas.(13)
During the Gulf War Allied tank crews were exposed to radiation the equivalent of a daily chest x-ray. This dosage is permissible, but not desirable, under current radiological health standards for civilians (14). The use, handling, and clearup of DU munitions has also been linked to the occurrence of 'Gulf War Syndrome', a mysterious illness, mostly affecting the immune system of which former soldiers who served in the Gulf have complained.(15)
Because their moral authority remains unchallenged, the West have been able to re-define DU as conventional weaponry, when by any criteria it is a chemical weapon, and arguably a low - level nuclear one.
Napalm is a sticky and highly combustible material which, when dropped in a bomb, disperses over a large area igniting anything in it's path. The Pentagon claimed it was only used to burn off oil in Iraqi defensive trenches. However The Washington Post reported it was used to reach 'entrenched troops'(19) and a US marine officer was quoted as saying "napalm was being used against Iraqi troops as it was against the enemy in Vietnam"(20).
Far from these bombs being dropped on exclusively military targets, many civilian targets were attacked as well. A daytime air attack on a bridge in Nasiriya, southern Iraq, killed at least 100 civilians(28). On 14 February 1991 a 'smart' bomb attack by the RAF on a bridge in Falluja missed completely, hitting a market 1km from the bridge and killing over 200 civilians(29). A similar attack on a bridge in Samawa killed over 100 civilians.(30)
The entire city of Basra, Iraq's second largest with a population of 800,000 was declared a target by the Allies, despite the Geneva Convention prohibiting area bombing in cities. On 12 February 1991 the Pentagon were claiming there were no civilians left in the city, and that it contained only military targets(31). Nevertheless, reports of hundreds of civilian casualties in and around Basra have emerged since the war.(32)
Perhaps the best known attack on a civilian target was the bombing of the al-Amariyah air raid shelter in western Baghdad, at 4.30 am on February 13 1991. The number of civilians killed varies from the Iraqi governments 300-400, to the Gulf Peace Team's 1,500 (33). The allies claimed the shelter was a 'command and control centre'(34) or a 'leadership bunker'(35). However, it had been built as a civilian installation in 1984, and had been in civilian use for at least 2 weeks prior to the attack.(36)
Shortly after the war, a retired Israeli General wrote "The Iraqi Army was not an unknown quantity. After 8 years of war with Iran it was very clear that it was not a threatening army, it was not a first-class fighting force"(38). Far from being 'the world's fourth largest army' as it had been frequently described in the West, the Iraqi army turned out to be an army of conscripts who during the Gulf War never mustered a single offensive strike, or any effective defensive action.
The Iraqi airforce never engaged with Western forces - over 20% flew to Iran and never returned. Nor were the anti-aircraft defenses of any use. In sharp contrast to the Vietnam war, not one B-52 bomber was lost in combat. Allied aircraft loses were lower than the normal combat training rate(39). Between 100,000 - 120,000 Iraqi's were killed during the war, compared to the 147 Western casualties. Western troops reoccupied Kuwait in a ground engagement lasting less than 100 hours(40). Within 3 months of the war the death toll was between 144,000 and 181,000(41). The infant mortality rate in Iraq has tripled since the Gulf War, and life expectancy in Iraq has reduced from 68 to 47 since the war.(42).
References
The dust released from these uranium tipped shells as they explode is suspected of causing genetic damage. It has been linked to rises in childhood cancers in Iraq since the Gulf War. The population of Iraq has never been informed of the hazard, nor offered compensation or measures to protect themselves. Britain and America have continued to cloak the development of these weapons and their hazardous nature in secrecy. And the facts about the impact of depleted uranium shells in Iraq remain hidden behind the system of United Nations sanctions which continue to cut off Iraq from the rest of the world.
Depleted Uranium (DU) is the waste product from the uranium enrichment process which produces reactor fuel and nuclear warheads. The stockpiles of DU built up by the nuclear industry provide cheap materials for munitions production, whilst sparing the nuclear industry the headache and expense of long-term storage. Instead they are able to dump their nuclear waste on a third world country.
As well as being cheap, DU weapons have also proved to be extremely effective in destroying tanks. Indeed such is the capacity of DU shells to cut through conventional armour that one expert has compared the development of DU weapons with the advent of the machine gun in the First World War - "The mechanised armies of all third world nations now are potential scrap iron" 1.
A missile made of DU - which is two and a half times denser than steel - provides maximum penetrative power because it concentrates phenomenal mass onto a single point. It's armour piercing capacity is spectacular. US A10 'tankbuster' pilots who fired DU missiles on Iraqi tanks during the Gulf War called it 'plinking' - slang for shooting tin cans. On penetrating a tank or armoured vehicle a DU shell fragments and ignites enhancing it's destructive power by setting alight the tank ammunition and fuel, probably burning the crew alive.
The Gulf War of 1991 was the first opportunity that the US and British forces had to test their DU weapons in combat conditions. How much depleted uranium was used may never be known but it has been estimated that the Allies fired between 5,000 - 6,000 DU tank rounds2 and 940,000 bullets from aircraft such as the A103. A secret report compiled by Britain's Atomic Energy Authority (AEA) , revealed by Nick Cohen in The Independent, estimated that the Allies had left at least 40 tonnes of DU, enough to cause "500,000 potential deaths", and that the sheer volume of DU left in Kuwait and Iraq "indicates a significant problem"4.
In addition to its immediate destructive effects DU is also accused of creating long-term health problems. DU explosions create microscopic airborne particles which can spread across kilometre-wide areas. They are sufficiently soluble to contaminate soil, groundwater and surface water. When ingested DU accumulates in the bones and kidneys and, like lead, is permanently deposited. It can cause irreversible damage to the kidneys and the growth of tumours. When inhaled toxic and radioactive particles are trapped permanently in the lungs increasing the risk of cancer. DU can cross the placenta during pregnancy, and foetuses are thought to be particularly vulnerable to it's toxic effects.
Iraq has never been informed of the use of depleted uranium, nor given any advice about it's dangers, or how safely to clear it up. The consequences are only now coming to light. Since the Gulf War doctors in Iraq have noted increases in unusual diseases, especially among children. The suggestion that these findings are linked to the use of DU in the Gulf War was investigated by a group of doctors and environmental scientists who heard about the secret AEA report. The Iraqi Society for Environmental Protection and Improvement (ISEPI) has verified the presence of DU contamination in southern Iraq. They have also published medical studies which record a rise in cases of childhood cancers, birth defects and abnormalities, and increases in male infertility - especially in the contaminated south of the country.
Collecting hard statistical evidence in Iraq has become increasingly difficult under sanctions. Health studies are made harder still by the fact that far fewer people seek medical care than before the war, when there was 97% urban and 70% rural access to modern healthcare5. Today, sanctions have brought the healthcare system to the point of collapse. Why go to a hospital or clinic suffering from severe shortages of equipment and drugs, especially when the cost of travel has become astronomical?
Nevertheless, a study by Dr. Muna Elhassani of the Iraqi Cancer Registry claims that between 1989 and 1993 there has been a rise in reported cases of leukaemia in Al-Qadisyah province of 183%. In Basra leukaemia rates have risen 56% and in Al-Muthana a staggering 350% - these are all areas with DU contamination. By contrast cases in Najav and Kerbala, in uncontaminated areas nearer the centre of the country, remained steady. Another study by Dr. Barnouti and Dr Al-Tawil has identified a significant increase in seminal fluid abnormalities in a group of patients tested at their clinic before and after the war. Geneticist Dr. Selma Al-Taha has pointed to increases in genetic abnormalities in new-born babies since the conflict. In particular, limb reductional abnormalities once associated with thalidomide and eradicated in the 60's, are now reappearing.6
The Western allies are well aware of the potential health risks DU poses. In May 1991 the US Defence Department admitted that the military use of DU results in "the potential to cause adverse impacts on human health, primarily through the water pathway." In the early 1980's a DU munitions manufacturer, National Lead Industries of Colonie, New York was closed down by the state government after airborne emissions of DU particles had been found over 26 miles away. Other DU munitions plants in Ohio and Oklahoma have been scheduled for shutdown after contamination was discovered. In both 1987 and 1991, the US Army issued guidelines on the handling of DU munitions and DU contaminated vehicles. No such guidelines have been passed to Iraq.
This callous disregard for Iraqi civilians and their environment was part and parcel of the allied Gulf War strategy. To the American and British authorities the Iraqi population, and indeed their own troops who handled DU, were expendable. In October 1990, shortly after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and the imposition of sanctions, and during the build up to the Gulf War, the US made clear it's plans for Iraq. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a political think tank that included Jeanne Kirkpatrick, Alexander Haig, and George Shultz on it's Board of Advisors, and whose Executive Director was Martin Indyk, published a paper by Patrick Clawson entitled "How Vulnerable is Iraq's Economy?". It examined how the UN could best undermine the Iraqi government.
In a chilling premonition of the war itself he writes "industry is not that vital to the economy... the industries which must concern the Iraqi government are those in which any shut down is felt immediately by consumers. Three principle industries fit this bill. First are the oil refineries, without which Iraq's transport system would come to a halt in weeks. Second are the dozen major electricity generating plants, without which industry will have to come to a screeching halt and food distribution will be complicated by a loss of refrigeration. Third and perhaps most sensitive are the water pumping/filtration stations in Baghdad, without which the cities population would be forced to spend many hours a day finding and purifying water." 7
Within hours of the start of the air war on 17 January 90% of Iraq's electricity production had been destroyed. The allies bombed 4 out of 7 major water pumping stations and 31 municipal water and sewerage treatment facilities. Oil facilities were crippled - even food warehouses and grain silos were hit 8.
A US airforce planner was quoted as admitting that targeting civilians plants was intended to tell the Iraqi people that "we're not going to tolerate Saddam Hussein or his regime. Fix that and we'll fix your electricity."9What wasn't admitted was that the allies dumped nuclear waste on northern Kuwait and southern Iraq.
This approach continues with sanctions - spare parts to repair and maintain the water system have been blocked by the sanctions committee as recently as this year. The continuation of the UN embargo has blocked facilities for further study of the effects of DU contamination - there has been a 67% decrease from 1989 in laboratory investigations by the Ministry of Health10. Severe shortages in cytotoxic and other cancer drugs hampers the treatment of victims of this contamination. Sanctions are preventing Iraq from properly clearing up the contamination caused by DU weapons.
The dichotomy between the moral superiority claimed by the West, and the tragic reality of their actions is now slowly unravelling. Former American and British soldiers suffering from 'Gulf War Syndrome' have brought to light some of the barbaric consequences of the Gulf War. The consequences of continuing sanctions are becoming increasingly difficult to justify.
Many UN aid organisations working in Iraq have deep reservations about sanctions, and UN policy towards Iraq. "I'm now ashamed to be in the United Nations" one head of agency told me, "I am embarrassed to be driving round Baghdad in a car with UN number plates". Another deputy from a UN agency told me how much he disagreed with the UN's latest 'oil for food' offer, resolution 986 "If Iraq had agreed to it, it would have set a precedent - that the great powers could dictate to smaller nations".
But though the moral high ground claimed by the West has been dented it remains intact. Although the US Department of Defense has been forced to admit the existence of Gulf War Syndrome the British government can still deny even its existence. Both can still ignore the suffering of Iraqis.
They are even able to suggest that Iraq itself is to blame for the devastation caused by the embargo. Despite all evidence to the contrary they are able to continue raising the spectre of hidden caches of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons to justify maintaining sanctions.
The need to stop the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is a central argument in the present demonising of Iraq and was key to justifying the Gulf War. While Iraq was and periodically is still accused of having a (non-existent) nuclear arsenal the real nuclear threat, the nuclear bullets the West fired during the Gulf War, is ignored. Because their moral superiority is still accepted the allies are still able to define DU as a conventional firearm with little challenge. Yet by any criteria it fits the definition of a chemical and radiological weapon. In Britain and America when DU is produced as a by-product of uranium enrichment it is classified as nuclear waste. When it is turned into a shell and fired at Iraq it becomes 'conventional'. The Iraqi people continue to suffer the consequences.
That is why the Edge gallery are inviting the Iraqi Society for Environmental Protection and Improvement to Britain, for a symposium in the autumn to highlight the consequences of using DU. The hazards of DU can only be evaluated by free discussion and debate amongst scientists and doctors. Iraq's international isolation and the UN blockade preventing that.
Hugh Livingstone and Kayode Olafimihan of The Edge Gallery
The Edge gallery's new exhibition, From Nuclear Bombs to Nuclear Bullets - Secret Nuclear War in the 50's and 90's opened on 12 July 1995 at
The Edge Gallery, 2 The Circle, Queen Elizabeth St, London SE1 2LP. The gallery will be inviting the Iraqi Society for Environmental Protection and Improvement to Britain for a symposium in the autumn to highlight the consequences of using DU - if you want to help phone 0171 403 4198.
The Edge Gallery, Queen Elizabeth St., London SE1 2LP
Phone and Fax: +44 171 403 4198
email: edge@easynnet.co.uk