Former UN arms inspector denounces Iraq sanctions

                    By Shannon Jones, wsw.org
                    29 May 2000

                    Scott Ritter, formerly a leading weapons inspector in Iraq for the United
                    Nation Special Commision (UNSCOM), denounced the economic
                    blockade of the Middle East nation at a rally opposing sanctions held
                    May 13 in the Detroit suburb of Southfield, Michigan. The former US
                    Marine officer resigned his post in August 1998 citing interference by the
                    UN with the work of inspectors.

                    The pacifist group Metro Detroit Against Sanctions called the rally, which
                    concluded with a picket of a local television station to protest the media
                    blackout of reports documenting the suffering of the Iraqi people. Also
                    on the platform was former US diplomat Edward Peck, local religious
                    leaders and Iraqi-Americans.

                    Speaking before an audience of some 300 Ritter declared, “The
                    termination of economic sanctions must be our number one priority. It is
                    a sad fact that 500,000 babies dying hasn't moved the American people
                    ...

                    “The US government has created a myth about Saddam Hussein as the
                    Middle East equivalent of Adolf Hitler. The only way you will deal with
                    the Middle East situation is based on fact. You will only have
                    disarmament if there is contact. It is not America's job to get rid of”
                    Hussein.

                    Ritter went on to expose the claims of the Clinton administration that Iraq
                    posed a military threat to neighboring states: “By 1998 Iraq's biological
                    and missile plants were destroyed. In terms of the intent of the UN
                    Security Council resolutions, Iraq had been disarmed. The world is blind
                    to this reality. Even though Iraq has been disarmed, sanctions will remain
                    until Hussein is gone.”

                    Edward Peck, who served as US Chief of Mission in Iraq and worked
                    as a coordinator of covert intelligence programs at the State Department,
                    also spoke in opposition to the sanctions. “What happens if the country
                    implodes? No one benefits,” Peck said. He warned that the sanctions
                    policy was eroding support for the United States among its former Gulf
                    War allies, the Arab states in particular. “We look inhuman,” he said,
                    “we look racist.”

                    Ritter and Peck join a growing number of former US and UN officials
                    who have publicly opposed the Iraq sanctions. In the fall of 1998 Dennis
                    Halliday, the coordinator of the UN's "Oil for Food" program, quit,
                    calling the sanctions “a bankrupt concept.” Last February two UN
                    officials resigned—Hans von Sponeck, Halliday's successor as
                    humanitarian relief coordinator, and Jutta Burghardt, head of the World
                    Food Program in Iraq. In announcing his resignation von Sponeck
                    declared, “I do not want to be associated with a Band-Aid that is
                    inadequate to end the plight of the civilian population.”

                    In the case of Ritter and Peck, however, it is not simply revulsion over
                    the humanitarian catastrophe produced by the blockade in Iraq. Both
                    men are longtime foreign policy operatives who have concluded that a
                    different policy is required to defend the interests of American
                    imperialism in the Middle East. That they now oppose the Clinton
                    administration over sanctions highlights the disarray in US foreign policy.

                    Ritter's team was involved in attempts by the US government to
                    destabilize the regime of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. He led a series
                    of highly intrusive inspections of Iraqi governmental sites which the
                    Clinton administration hoped would provoke a hostile Iraqi response that
                    could serve as the basis for rallying domestic and international support for
                    military action. It later came to light that these inspections were aimed at
                    tracking the movements of Hussein in preparation for a possible
                    assassination. In Iraq Ritter had close contact with officials of the
                    American CIA and it was alleged, but not proven, that he had ties to
                    Israeli intelligence.

                    Before joining UNSCOM Ritter served as an aide to General Norman
                    Schwarzkopf during the Gulf War. He has called at various times for the
                    use of the US military to overthrow the regime of Iraqi President Saddam
                    Hussein.

                    In his book Endgame, published in 1999 following his departure from
                    UNSCOM, Ritter describes the growth of his disillusionment with US
                    policy toward Iraq. One event he cited was the botched attempt by the
                    Clinton administration to rally public support for military action against
                    Iraq at a Columbus, Ohio town meeting in February 1998. The meeting
                    turned into a nationally televised debacle for the Clinton administration
                    when Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Secretary of Defense
                    William Cohen and National Security Adviser Sandy Berger became
                    visibly flustered under intense questioning by opponents of military
                    intervention.

                    The failure of the Clinton administration to rally public support for military
                    action against Iraq and the growing divisions among the former Gulf War
                    allies of the US led Ritter to the conclusion that a military solution to the
                    Iraq problem was untenable.

                    In Endgame he accuses the Clinton administration of having no workable
                    policy toward Iraq. He decries economic sanctions as a “morally
                    reprehensible policy” which has discredited the US internationally. He
                    says of Iraq's military, “The Iraqi army is in total disarray, capable of little
                    more than manning security pickets along the Iran-Iraq border, in
                    northern Iraq (Kurdistan), and in Southern Iraq.” The Iraqi air force,
                    Ritter asserts, “would be shot out of the sky by any of the modern air
                    forces of its neighbors.”

                    Ritter has also called for a halt to the ongoing bombing of Iraq by the
                    United States and Britain. He has called the air strikes, which have taken
                    the lives of numerous civilians, a violation of international law.

                    Following the publication of Ritter's book his name dropped out of the
                    news in line with the unstated policy of the American news media of
                    blacking out all opposition to the sanctions policy of the Clinton
                    administration. Similarly Ritter's remarks to the rally in Michigan were not
                    reported by any of the local television stations or newspapers.