http://www.commondreams.org/views/070700-103.htm
 

Denis Halliday: Iraq Sanctions Are Genocide
by Michael Jansen
 
Every time Washington suspects that Iraq is making gains in the propaganda
war over sanctions, reports emanate from the US capital claiming that Baghdad

continues to be a global menace and must be “contained� by the blockade.
The latest yarn alleges Iraq is testing short-range missiles.

Down around the third or fourth paragraph the writer admits that such
missiles do not violate the terms of “the Mother of All UN Resolutions,�
which lays down what sort of weaponry Iraq can have: short-range missiles
with a range of 150 kilometers are permitted.

Some reports infer that Iraq is also redeveloping medium-range missiles in
violation of the resolution. But this has been categorically denied by Scott
Ritter, the US citizen who formerly served on the UN Special Commission which

monitored Iraq’s arms of mass destruction.

Ritter, writing in the current issue of Arms Control Today, an independent
journal published in Washington, says that Iraq now has no banned arms of any

importance.

Nevertheless, US and British warplanes continue to bomb Iraqi targets on an
every-other-day basis and insist that the punitive sanctions regime must be
maintained until Saddam Hussein is no longer in power. This unending
belligerency against Iraq has now caused the most respectable of the
opposition groups, the Iraqi National Accord, to pull out of the umbrella
grouping, the Iraqi National Congress, which is meeting in London this week
to work out a new strategy to topple Hussein.

One of the reasons given by the Accord for withdrawing from the Congress is
its close connection with the US Central Intelligence Agency, Congressional
leaders and the Clinton administration. All are viewed by ordinary Iraqis
living under sanctions as their inveterate enemy rather than Saddam. The
Accord clearly realized that membership in the Council is not only
counterproductive but also pointless because it will never be in a position
to oust Saddam’s regime.

This being the case, Denis Halliday, the former UN humanitarian coordinator
in Baghdad who resigned in 1998 to protest against the sanctions, is now
offering Washington and London an alternative to their murderous sanctions
policy. He is proposing a 13-point plan which includes the resumption of UN
monitoring of Iraq’s weapons program; imposition of “smart� sanctions
on
arms-producing states to prevent Iraq from obtaining prohibited weaponry; an
end to the “demonization� of Iraq and its president; dialogue with
Baghdad;
lifting of economic sanctions; release of oil equipment to repair the
country’s severely damaged oil industry; investment in the devastated
economy; postponement of reparations payments which consume 30 percent of
gross oil revenues; and an end to the daily Anglo-US bombing sorties which
Iraq says have killed 300 of its civilians and wounded more.

Halliday, who had made a career in the UN and held the rank of assistant
secretary-general before he resigned, admitted to this correspondent in an
interview that he was not “very happy� with his plan. But he said it had
been designed to “help Washington and London to get out of this dreadful
mess
they have gotten themselves into� by insisting on sanctions until Saddam
disappears from the scene.

While he agrees that Saddam’s presence at the helm permits Washington and
its
loyal acolyte, London, to continue the punitive sanctions regime, Halliday
thinks there are “a few people� in Washington who want to bring sanctions
to
an end. These people, he said, have come to realize that the US, and
specifically the Clinton administration, could “be blamed for crimes
against
humanity, including possibly genocide� because of the sanctions.

Halliday is not very optimistic about the US changing its policy under either

of Clinton’s potential successors, Vice-President Al Gore or Texas Governor

George W. Bush, who have shown themselves more hawkish on Iraq than Clinton..
 

“What I’m working on now is trying to get other governments … to put
pressure on Washington to change its policy� before Clinton leaves office
in
January 2001, he said. “In much of the world there is outrage amongst
parliamentarians over the continuation of economic sanctions.�

He believes that these anti-sanctions parliamentarians could reinforce the
position of the 70 “courageous� US congressmen who have taken a stand
against the blockade. These lawmakers understand, he said, that the “human
calamity� caused by sanctions “isn’t serving the best interests of the
US or
Europe.�

In his opinion, the UN will never again be able to impose the sort of
“illegal� sanctions Iraq has endured for the past 10 years. “What is
happening in Iraq is a complete breach of international humanitarian law,�
he
stated. It amounts to “punishing a people in order to get at their
ruler.�

Indeed, he believes that the sanctions provisions in the UN Charter will have

to be “rewrittenâ€? so that no other  population is ever targeted in the
way
the people of Iraq have. He defines the Iraqi sanctions as “genocide�
because “if you look at the convention on genocide, it requires intent.�

To sum up his thinking: since the Security Council, under US/UK pressure,
persists with sanctions knowing what impact the embargo is having on the
Iraqi populace, one cannot but conclude that the council is responsible for
the murder of 7,000 Iraqis a month, 5,000 of them children under the age of
five.
 

###
 
 

Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service providing breaking news

and views for the Progressive Community.