Down-loading death
By Salah Hemeid
Ask any Iraqi -- whether a supporter or detractor of Saddam Hussein
-- about
the legacy of the Gulf crisis triggered by the 1990 invasion of Kuwait
and
they respond unequivocally that it is a human tragedy. This dramatic,
yet,
profound, conclusion is difficult to argue with given that prior to
the 1991
Gulf War Iraq was envied as one of the richest and most advanced countries
in the Arab world.
A decade after the invasion of 2 August 1990, a state of unpredictability
and confusion still prevails in Iraq. The main lesson drawn by Iraqis
from
the Gulf War along with subsequent attacks by the US and British forces
and
the devastating United Nations economic sanctions, is that they have
been
punished during the last ten years for a crime they did not commit.
When the United States formed and led the international alliance against
Saddam Hussein, the reason it gave was to liberate Kuwait and to prevent
the
recurrence of such an aggression against America's friends in the region.
Others noted US concern to protect oil resources, and most importantly,
their unobstructed flow into Western markets. But 10 years later, it
seems
clear that the "liberation of Kuwait" and the subsequent sanctions
were only
a pretext to destroy Iraq.
Over the past 10 years, Iraqi officials, backed by UN figures, estimate
that
over 1.5 million Iraqis, half of them children, died due to malnutrition,
medicine shortages and limited availability of proper medical treatment.
The
remainder of the population suffers malnutrition and diseases transmitted
by
impure water.
Meanwhile, Iraq, under the embargo, has experienced a massive shift
from
relative affluence to widespread poverty. Its economy is stagnant,
the
distribution of wealth has become increasingly skewed and the brain
drain
has become more acute. The cumulative impact of this devastation has
destroyed the very fabric of Iraqi society. Reviewing this situation,
it
becomes evident that sanctions impacted on the people, but not the
regime.
Added to the economic sanctions, Iraq has been subject to a stringent
political and diplomatic embargo and to repeated military confrontations
and
threats. Since 1991, the United States has insisted on completely disarming
Iraq. It has prevented attempts to break Iraq's isolation and continued
to
use its air force to impose two no-fly zones, one in the north and
the other
in the south. When it has bombed Iraq, numerous civilians have been
killed.
This kind of punishment may have contained the regime's regional ambitions,
as perceived by the United States, but it has also divested the population
of any political resources. Counter to US intentions, these actions
have
promoted among Iraqis the sense of a persecuted nation which needs
the
unwavering loyalty of its citizens to survive.
Analysts who have been following the situation carefully have noted
that the
Iraq situation has developed to become primarily a conflict between
Hussein's regime and the United States. While the first struggles for
survival, the latter pursues a vague policy of containment which uses
the
sanctions, the no-fly zones and other means of pressure to try to cause
the
regime to collapse.
For a growing number of people worldwide, the United States, with regards
to
its involvement in Iraq, has degenerated into nothing more than Hussein's
jailer and is increasingly seen as a bully beating up on a small nation.
The
failure to end this cat and mouse game can only continue to do enormous
damage to the defenseless Iraqi people and foster instability in the
region.
For its part, Hussein's regime, has been unwavering in its policies
towards
its own people, refusing entirely to change its rigid political system.
Meanwhile, on the international level, the Iraqi regime's isolation
has been
mitigated slightly by the de facto recognition of countries like China,
France and Russia which have adopted the view that the present government
is
"a fact of life" they have to deal with. Last week, for example, the
Iraqi
media highlighted the visit made by Deputy Prime Minister Tarek Aziz
to
Russia and the commitment Moscow made to increase its efforts to get
the
sanctions lifted.
The return to Iraq by former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter to film
a
documentary that supports Iraq's claims that it is free of nuclear
and
biological weapons, was also widely publicised by the official media.
Yet, the only gesture the regime made towards its people on the eve
of the
10th anniversary of the invasion of Kuwait was to open an Internet
café in
Baghdad, the first in Iraq. However, the problem with the café
is not only
most of Iraq's impoverished people will not have access to it, but
that it
is run by the government which has prevented the down-loading of many
Web
sites that it deems "immoral."