Home

The Ottoman Empire

At one time--The Muslims were the superpower of the world

At one time--Islam was the supreme law of the lands

[Of course, Islam was truly and really the supreme law of the land at Prophet Muhammad's (SAWS) time, and the rightly guided khalifs' time as well. After that, there wasn't too much to compare to it. However, The early Sultans of the Ottoman Empire tried to establish an Islamic society and accomplished much more than any other "Islamic" Country at our time has done. During the Ottoman Empire, Islam was the superpower of the world, and it ruled over many lands, not just a country. Nevertheless, what is very clear, is that AFTER Islam was put on the side or not at the priority of the state, The Empire greatly and terribly declined]

    The Ottoman Empire expanded to the north, south, east, and west. It stretched out over Asian, African, and European lands. Religion, trade, and learning flourished throughout the whole empire giving rise and growth to this Islamic kingdom. The Ottoman Empire was a strong and prosperous empire that flourished for more than 600 years. However, in later years, the lack of values that later leaders held, the poor economic decisions, and the lack of political order and control were three things that led to the decline of this empire.

    Prior to the decline of this Empire, the Ottoman Empire was very prosperous and thriving. This empire was founded in the 13th century by Osman Bey. Constantinople or Istanbul served as the capital and the center of trade. At its height in the 1500s, the Ottoman Empire controlled an enormous area extending from the Balkan Peninsula to the Middle East and North Africa. Rulers were considered valid only if they enforced the shariaa, the holy law of Islam based on teachings of the Qur’an. Islamic law was considered above, rather than a part of, the state. The first Ottoman sultans thought themselves as protectors of the whole Muslim world. The first Ottoman sultans were pious Muslims who did their best to incorporate the law of God--they ruled, using the religion as a tool of control over their people. Taking these facts into consideration, one can understand why the empire was so prosperous. With Islam ruling above the Sultan, the personal motives of the sultans diminished---and the law of Islam prospered. Within the Ottoman Empire’s European territories, including about 238,000 square miles and about 9 million people, the Ottoman government controlled a primarily Christian population (Jelavich 3 ). They lived comfortably and were free to practice their religion. The Ottoman sultans had a very strong military; the government was a centralized administration, well-organized bureaucracy. The Political establishment was based on Islam. The Ottomans controlled the world’s richest centers of trade, and the treasury in the palace was continuously overflowing. Many of these aspects were missing as the empire weakened.

    The decline of the Ottoman empire was not abrupt and resulted because of many factors.One of the major things that led to this decline were the rulers that ruled. The Empire reached its height while Suleyman the Magnificent ruled. He was superior to all the European powers in battle; at home, he was building mosques, schools, and hospitals. He had a standing army of 50,000 who were very well paid (Barber 24). All the rulers up until after Suleyman the Magnificent were remarkable rulers. The rulers after that were mostly weak and untrained. After Suleyman the Magnificent, there was a change in the training, personality, and activities of the rulers. The personality and devotion of the sultans were very important. Before the decline, the Ottoman princes received the best education available--they served as governors of provinces under the supervision of experienced administrators. When they came to thrown, they knew the problems and issues they had to handle (Sugar 188) .On the other hand, later leaders spent time in their palaces overwhelmed by their luxury. The Ottoman princes were no longer adequately trained, but the training was replaced by the kafes, which is the “golden cage system”. This system made sure that the princes were kept from birth inside their palaces. These princes lacked the very necessary training for the difficult task of ruling such a prosperous empire. Instead, they were weak and had no knowledge of how to rule or had no knowledge of the ‘real world’. They did not receive any training and were hidden away from the world. As ridiculous as it may seem, they were then elevated into being in charge of more than thirty million people--and they had no idea of what they were doing. Weak sultans gave out their authority to irresponsible people, and many people would use the sultan’s authority for their personal motives.

    In the past, the sultans were involved and committed to the people. Later on, even the strong sultans abandoned their duties to the people. For example, even though Mehmed deeply admired the arts and encouraged great writings to flourish throughout the Empire, Mehmed II was the first to stop attending the councils of the state because he didn’t have time. Even if the rulers improved certain aspects of the empire--they neglected the most important element within the empire---the people. In the nineteenth century, many problems arose when there was an effort to reform. Many reformers and sultans, such as Selim III, and Mahmud II, thought that the state had to be saved through the adoption of European methods. For example, Selim’s attempt to establish a modern army organized by the Europeans completely failed; his plans were abandoned and he was assassinated and replaced by Mahmud II. Also, these ‘reforms’ , which were later stressed by other sultans, made things worse and created dualism, which means there were two different groups of laws in the society; there was no basis in the Ottoman society. In 1826 many new laws [unislamic], regulations, and institutions were made by sultans. However, the old ones were never abolished. This was an irresponsible act of some of these later sultans---they believed that they had to take on European methods [ at the same time they did not abolish all the Islamic laws and systems that the majority of the empire supported]. For example, the Islamic educational system [of the Ulema] co-existed with French teachings in the new training colleges (Zurcher 48). The law of Islam existed side by side with new European laws. This created confusion since the older and the newer laws were not defined clearly. These reforms, that just caused problems, were also expensive. Financial resources were insufficient and the attempts to increase them were badly mismanaged (Zurcher 48). Some of these later sultans did not know how to adequately make decisions on certain aspects. It wasn‘t because they were stubborn or unintelligent. It was because they were neither trained nor strong. They, indeed, lacked the strong values that the earlier sultans had. How can you take a thriving and prosperous empire and put someone who is weak, untrained, and unfitting to the thrown? This was exactly what happened, and when problems arose -- there were no solutions.

    One of the major things that also contributed to the downfall of the Ottoman empire was the economic deterioration. Money problems within the empire as well as international trade losses troubled the economy greatly. The loss of the trade routes in the Ottoman empire gradually but directly effected the Ottoman decline. In the beginning, external trade played a very small part in the economics of the Ottoman empire . Since the empire was so huge, extending over large areas, the empire was self-sufficient and did not need much from the outside world. Capitulations were one of the factors that brought economic decline and the fall of the Empire. Capitulations were a system of trade agreements that gave certain economic privileges to foreign importers and exporters. The Capitulations destructed the economy only when other countries profited from the Capitulations and when this created an unequal exchange (The Fall of the Ottoman Empire 5). The most critical Capitulation was the one Suleyman settled with France in 1536. Suleyman gave France many privileges and put very little or no taxes on the imports and exports that came to and from France (The Fall of the Ottoman Empire 6). In later years, These privileges that France had, eventually, served as models for those granted to England, Holland, and other countries. Basically, the Ottoman Empire gave international-trade privileges to other countries. Gradually, as the rest of the world became stronger, they took advantage of the trade the Ottoman Empire had to offer. They , slowly , laid higher taxes on the Ottoman Empire, while the Ottoman Empire laid little taxes on them. Then the outside world became much stronger and the Ottoman Empire became weaker---and it was in serious debt. To total the fall of the trade economy, in 1838, there was a commercial agreement with England which established an example of a Capitulation that was aimed at colonizing and controlling the Ottoman economy (The Fall of the Ottoman Empire 6). The agreement damaged the Empire’s efforts towards economic development. It created a huge debt, bankruptcy, and obtained all the internal income that would normally go to the Ottoman Empire (The Fall of the Ottoman Empire 6). Before, the goods of India, Sind, and China used to come to Suez, and were distributed by Muslims to all over the world (The Fall of the Ottoman Empire 3). Later on, goods were carried on Portugese, Dutch, and English ships to Frangistan, and were spread all over the world from there. Then, they brought what they didn’t need to Istanbul and other Islamic lands and sold it for five times the price, thus earning much money---bankrupting the Ottoman treasury.

    From 1590 the Ottoman budget showed large deficits. The income of the empire calculated in gold fell from 5.8 million in 1567 to 2.5 million in 1597. To take care of this problem, sultans found it necessary to raise taxes permanently. Also, the army required an abundance of money continuously. To keep a large regular army, expenses were high. For example, when the Ottoman military captured Cyprus in 1571, a strong Christian alliance was created. The strong allied fleet, under the command of Don John of Austria, defeated the Ottoman fleet at Lepanto (Inalcik 41). The war fleet of two hundred galleys were built to replace the ships that were destroyed at Lepanto: that alone cost 1.2 million in gold each year (The Fall of the Ottoman Empire 6).

Since the empire was so huge, and because other countries around the Ottoman empire posed great threats to the empire, the Ottoman empire had to adopt a more defensive, permanent and numerous army. This quickly formed a terrible burden on the economy. Later, sultans were always trying to gather money for the special treasury created for the army. Again, they increased taxes. Since a great portion of the Ottoman income came from the fiefs, the loss of lands from defeats greatly weakened the Ottoman treasury (The Fall of the Ottoman Empire 3).

The raising of taxes became more and more difficult. When these later sultans saw that the empire was in desperate need of money, they had a desire to collect and build up the maximum wealth as quickly as possible. The burden of the taxes and the enforced collection created many revolts. The eighteenth and nineteenth century was a period of economic crisis for the empire. In the late 1700s, because of inflation, the value of one Ottoman piastre fell by about 500% (Zurcher 45). In the early 1800s, the salaries of the people were so low that the people complained and revolted frequently (Zurcher 45). In 1826, even more money was given to the army from tax-farms, confiscated property, and religious services that were brought under government control ( Jelavich, B. 144 ). All of these things not only put the economy of the Ottoman Empire in great danger, but the uprisings and the many revolts created instability, and the internal political order of the Empire was deteriorating.

 

    A third crucial reason for the decline of the Ottoman Empire was the lack of political order and control in the later years of the Ottoman Empire. The great size of the Ottoman Empire made it harder to govern in distant areas. Because of the various problems and the lack of respect given to the unqualified sultans, many of the local governors ruled with personal interests and not for the interest of the people. Since many of the surrounding countries (such as Britain and Russia) were rising and becoming more powerful, the outside world posed many threats to the Ottoman areas. Furthermore, the means of transportation and communication at that time was not compatible with the size of the empire and , therefore, the Ottoman Empire was too big to defend. Also, financial and economic problems caused chaos throughout the Empire, slowly deteriorating the internal political order and control that the Sultans once held. Internal revolts reduced the army’s fighting strength so that they weren’t able to fight foreign armies. Revolts became very frequent within the empire. Because the Janissaries, who were relied upon to establish security in the Ottoman Empire, were underpaid, they became a threat. They posed a great danger at a time when the Empire was involved in crucial wars on its borders. For example, Janissary General Abdul Halim Kara Yaziji revolted in Upper Syria; he attacked the governors of Damascus in the south and Baghdad in the east and defeated them. He died in a battle and his brother carried on after him. The Sultan sent for him and his janissary followers and pressured them with great difficulty to fight the Austrians who tried to take over areas near Buda. Finally, these janissary rebels went to fight and died for their country. There were many other janissary revolts. However, they lasted until 1826, when it finally became possible to get rid of the rebelling janissaries (The Fall of the Ottoman Empire 9). Nevertheless, other risings and revolts continued. The Kurd leader, Janbulad, governor of Klis near Aleppo, revolted. Prince Fakhruddin, the Druse governor in Lebanon revolted, as well. After the Sultan took care of other problems in Eastern Europe, he sent an army against Janbulad, who was defeated, but went to Prince Fakruddin who gave him shelter (Mahmud 256 ). The Druses had the advantage of their native hills and resisted the Sultan’s forces effectively (Mahmud 256 ). With some difficulty, other minor risings in Asia Minor were put down.

    The European nations began to rise and gain power. The Ottomans fought them back with various fortunes. Russia allied with the Christian nations against the Ottomans (Mahmud 254 ). The balance of powers were all against the Ottomans; then, the Ottomans began to lose battles and, gradually, became weaker. In the Ottoman Empire, there were two fronts, one in the east and another in the west, with Istanbul in the center. In one season, a full military group could not be mounted on more than one front, leaving the other front undefended. This was dangerous, since surrounding countries were becoming more and more powerful. Many times the surrounding countries aimed at controlling the trade routes before they planned to take over Ottoman lands. The other powers knew that when the trade routes were taken over, the lands of the Ottoman Empire would then be easier to capture and vice versa. This is because once an opposing power establishes itself in the middle or by the Ottoman Empire, it is easier for them to gradually take over other areas in the Empire. Under the reign of Suleyman, the Ottomans controlled the eastern Mediterranean trade routes as well as the very important routes of Europe. Then, the Europeans expanded overseas, reaching America by crossing the Atlantic, and Asia by going around the Cape of Good Hope, and passing through the Straits of Magellan into the Pacific Ocean. This created many dangerous threats to the Islamic countries. Confusion resulted from the Europeans establishing themselves on the coasts of America, India, and the Persian Gulf. Many Ottoman observers, such as Omar Talip saw the danger of this. He stated that the Ottoman Empire must seize the shores of Yemen and the trade passing that way; or otherwise before very long, the Europeans will rule over the lands of Islam. The Ottomans were not successful in preventing the Portugese expansion in the Indian Ocean. The Ottomans still controlled the northern trade route. However, since Russia took Kazan (1552) and Astrakhan (1556), this route was in danger too. To work against this, The sultan tried to join the rivers Don and Volga by a canal dug at the point where they were nearest to each other, so that the route would be easier to protect. Protected by an army of thirteen thousand men, six thousand workers set out to work. The project had to be abandoned because of the terrible winter and the lack of technology at that time. Finally, the Ottomans lost the northern trade. Thus, foreign armies targeted Ottoman lands and started to take them over. The Ottoman empire lost one province after another until the empire greatly reduced. By the beginning of the nineteenth century, the weak Ottoman government could neither control rebellious governors nor defeat foreign armies. There was a decline of toleration, a breakdown of law and order, and endless instability throughout the entire Empire.

    By the end of the eighteenth century there was nothing left of the Empire but uncultivated land, poor villages, and a large number of unemployed peasants. As every prosperous Empire had eventually declined---the prosperous Ottoman Empire had declined, as well. The lack of values that the later leaders held, the poor economic decisions, and the lack of political order and control were three things that led to the decline of this Empire but , indeed , were not the only things that led to the decline. After Suleyman’s death, the gradual decline of the Ottoman Empire began, finally ending completely three hundred years later in 1924 when Kemal Ataturk abolished the Muslim caliphate and founded the Republic of Turkey.


  • Inalcik, Halil. (1973). The Ottoman Empire. New York: Prager Publishers, Inc.

  • Jelavich, Charles. (1977). The Establishment of the Balkan National States, 1804-1920. USA: University of Washington Press.

  • Jelavich, Barbara Brightfield. (1985). History of the Balkans. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sugar, Peter F. . (1993). Southeastern Europe under Ottoman Rule, 1354-1804. USA: University of Washington Press.

  • Mahmud, S.F. . (1995). A Short History of Islam. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

  • Zurcher, Erik J. . (1993). Turkey: A Modern History. New York: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

  • Mansel, Philip. (1996). Constantinople. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

  • Barber, Noel. (1973). The Sultans. New York: Simon and Schuster.

  • The Fall of the Ottoman Empire. (Internet). Accessed: May 2001. www.mfa.gov.tr/grupe/eg/eg05/11.htm.