To Main Page to View Table of Contents
Project Map
|
Continued from Previous Page
Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2002 Power to Call for Information (Clause: 14)
For the purpose of carrying out his duties under this Scheme, a Banking Ombudsman may require the bank named in the complaint or any other related bank to provide any information or furnish certified copies of any document relating to the subject matter of the complaint which is or is alleged to be in its possession.
Provided that in the event of the failure of a bank to comply the requisition without any sufficient cause made under sub-clause (1) the Banking Ombudsman may, if he deems fit, draw the inference that the information, if provided or copies if furnished, would be unfavourable to the bank.
The Banking Ombudsman shall maintain confidentiality of any information or document coming into his knowledge or possession in the course of discharging his duties and shall not disclose such information or document to any person except with the consent of the person furnishing such information or document. Provided that nothing in this clause shall prevent the Banking Ombudsman from disclosing information or document furnished by a party in a complaint to the other party or parties, to the extent considered by him to be reasonably required to comply with the principles of natural justice and fair play in the proceedings.
Settlement of Complaint by Agreement (Clause: 15 )
As soon as it may be practicable to do, the Banking Ombudsman shall cause a notice of the receipt of any complaint along with a copy of the complaint to the branch or office of the bank named in the complaint and endeavour to promote a settlement of the complaint by agreement between the complainant and the bank named in the complaint through conciliation or mediation;
For the purpose of promoting a settlement of the complaint, the Banking Ombudsman may follow such procedures as he may consider appropriate and he shall not be bound by any legal rule of evidence.
Award by The Banking Ombudsman (Clause: 16)
If a complaint is not settled by agreement within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the complaint or such further period as the Banking Ombudsman may consider necessary, he may pass an Award after affording the parties reasonable opportunity to present their case. He shall be guided by the evidence placed before him by the parties, the principles of banking law and practice, directions, instructions and guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank from time to time and such other factors which in his opinion are necessary in the interest of justice.
The Award passed under sub-clause (1) above shall state the direction/s, if any, to the bank for specific performance of its obligations in addition to the amount to be paid by the bank to the complainant by way of compensation for the loss suffered by him along with the summary of the reasons for passing the Award.
Provided that the Banking Ombudsman shall not give any direction/s in the Award under sub-clause (1) above regarding payment of compensation in excess of that which is necessary to cover the loss suffered by the complainant as a direct consequence of the commission or omission of the bank, or for an amount exceeding rupees ten lakhs whichever is lower.
The Banking Ombudsman may while passing an Award under clause (1) above, in respect of a complaint as stipulated under Clause 13(4) of the Scheme, may direct the complainant to furnish an indemnity, on the lines as per sub-clause (4).
The indemnity referred to in Sub-clause (3) shall be in favour of the bank whereby the complainant should undertake to refund to the bank such amount as the bank would pay to him in implementation of the Award, together with interest accrued thereon at the rate as applicable for deposit in savings account, in the event of the decision of the Court in a criminal proceeding or civil proceeding, or tribunal or arbitrator or any other forum as the case may be, against the complainant leading to the conclusion that there was no such omission or commission on the part of the bank or its employee which could be considered as an act with wrong intention and motive on the part of the bank or its employee to facilitate the commission of fraud or unauthorised withdrawal from the bank account of the complainant and in such cases it shall be open to the bank to invoke the indemnity against the complainant.
In the event of the complainant refusing to honour the indemnity given by him in favour of the bank it shall be open to the bank to approach a court of law for invoking its claim based on the indemnity against the complainant.
A copy of the Award shall be sent to the complainant and the bank named in the complaint.
An Award shall not be binding on a bank against which it is passed unless the complainant furnishes to it, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the Award, a letter of acceptance of the award in full and final settlement of his claim in the matter. If the complainant does not accept the Award passed by the Banking Ombudsman and fails to furnish his letter of acceptance within such time without making any request for extension of time to comply with such requirements his complaint shall be rejected by the Banking Ombudsman.
Provided that in the event of the complainant making a written request for extension of time, the Banking Ombudsman may subject to his being satisfied with the explanation as furnished by the complainant about his inability to consider the Award and furnish his letter of acceptance, grant extension of time up to further period of fifteen days for such compliance.
The bank shall within one month from the date of receipt by it, of the acceptance in writing of the Award by the complainant as per sub-clause ( 7 ) above comply with the Award and intimate the compliance to the Banking Ombudsman.
If in the opinion of the bank the Award passed against it is :
based on wrong appreciation of facts, law, banking practice, or general directions, if any, issued by the Reserve Bank ; or>
implementation of the Award is likely to create a bad precedent for the bank or banking companies , or banking system in general; the bank may file a review application as per provisions of the clause 17 of the Scheme. The bank shall in relation to such Award intimate to the Banking Ombudsman within one month from the date of receipt of copy of the Award its decision to file the review petition.
The Banking Ombudsman shall report to the Reserve Bank the non-compliance by any bank of an Award which became binding on it and on receipt of such report the Review Authority shall pass necessary order.
Provided that in the event of the bank failing to implement the Award within the prescribed time limit, the complainant may also, if he so desires, approach the Review Authority with a prayer to pass an appropriate direction to the bank for immediate compliance of the Award.
Proceedings before The Review Authority (Clause: 17)
A bank not agreeing to accept the Award as referred to in sub-clause (1) of Clause 16 of the Scheme may file a review application before the Review Authority within one month from the date of receiving copy of the Award or within such further time as may be allowed by the Review Authority in special circumstances of the case where the bank justifies the reason for not being able to file the petition within the prescribed time.
Provided a review application filed by a bank shall lie only if the application has the approval of the Chairman or in his absence the Managing Director or the Chief Executive Officer or any other officer of equal rank, of the bank, as the case may be.
The Review Authority shall not receive any such additional or new material from any party, which was not produced before the Banking Ombudsman.
The Review Authority on receiving such application shall serve a copy of the review application as soon as possible, to the other party, requiring his reply to the review application within a period of two weeks or such further time as the Review Authority may allow.
The Review Authority may call for the comments of the Banking Ombudsman in a review application filed before him provided he is satisfied that such comments of the Banking Ombudsman are necessary in the exigencies of the case.
Directions Issued by the Review Authority Clause: 18
The Review Authority on consideration of the review application and being satisfied that the Award requires review by the Banking Ombudsman shall remand the matter to the Banking Ombudsman for reviewing the Award in the light of observation made by the Review Authority.
The remand of the matter as per sub-clause (1) by the Review Authority shall be made within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of the review application or within such reasonable time as the Review Authority may consider necessary.
If on consideration of the review application filed by the bank the Review Authority is satisfied that there is no ground for review of the Award it shall issue an appropriate direction to the bank for the implementation of the Award, within six weeks from the date of submission of the review application or within such reasonable time as the Review Authority may consider necessary.
Rejection Of The Complaint (Clause: 19)
The Banking Ombudsman may reject the complaint at any stage if it appears to him that the complaint made is;
frivolous, vexatious, malafide ; or
without any sufficient cause or;
that it is not pursued by the complainant with reasonable diligence or;
prima facie, there is no loss or damage or inconvenience caused to the complainant.
The Banking Ombudsman may reject a complaint at any stage, if after consideration of the complaint and evidence produced before him the Banking Ombudsman is of the opinion that the complicated nature of the complaint requires consideration of elaborate documentary and oral evidence and the proceedings before the Banking Ombudsman are not appropriate for adjudication of such complaint. The decision of the Banking Ombudsman in this regard shall be final and binding on the complainant and the bank
Banks to Display Salient Features of The Banking Ombudsman Scheme for Common Knowledge of Public. (Clause: 20)
The banks covered by the Scheme shall ensure that the purpose of the Scheme and the name and address of the Banking Ombudsman to whom the complaints are to be made by the aggrieved party are displayed in all of the office premises in such a manner and at such place, so that it is put to notice of common public visiting the respective office premises of the bank.
The banks covered by the Scheme shall ensure that a copy of the Scheme is made available with the designated officer of the bank for perusal in the office premises of the bank if anyone desires to do so and common notice to such effect about the availability of the Scheme with such designated officer is displayed along with the notice to be displayed by the banks as per sub-clause (1) of this clause.
|