Pseudo
A pseudo-squeeze is, of course by definition, not a real one where a defender simply has no discard that won't cost a trick available. The defender has one if he can visualize the cards perfectly, but he feels squeezed and plays accordingly. I can't speak to everyone's use of the term, which at its shabbiest is no doubt on occasion applied to a flagrantly inept discard. But at its best, the pseudo-squeeze has all the earmarks of a genuine squeeze, both to declarer and the defender who feels squeezed, such that you won't even know whether it's a pseudo or the genuine kind until you look at the cards a moment. Well, okay, excepting the highest level of experts.
So I wouldn't sneer at pseudo-squeezes. You set up for them the same as you do for a genuine squeeze, rectifying the count, preserving access to each hand, and then have a run with a third suit that makes discards difficult. Since you can't know yet whether there's a pseudo or a genuine or neither, there's nothing to sneer at. You merely give yourself the best chance for the maximum number of tricks and you can analyze the hand later if that's your thing. You might note that in the first two examples, the defensive hands are only one card away from a genuine squeeze. Above are links to some examples.