The 1976 Nottinghill Carnival Riots. |
Every year, during the August bank -holiday,
Britain's West Indian community holds a Carribean-style carnival, with colourful
parades, music, dancing and dozens of side events. Hundreds of thousands
of people from all over the country attend. It is held on the streets of
North Kensington. This year, however, the festivities were interrupted on
the last day. Young blacks harrassed by a police presence numbering 1, 600
defended themselves against arbitrary police arrests. At about 5pm rioting
broke out, it spread over the whole Ladbroke Grove area and lasted well
into the night. Over 300 police were injured, 35 police vehicles were damaged,
several shops looted and 60 people arrested. |
 |
This is an attempt to sort out the reports in
the media. The large police presence was 'justified' by shady allegations
of mass outbreaks of petty crime by young blacks in the crowds. But this
was no excuse for the massive police presence. The young blacks, people
with good memories, knew that the police were there for the express purpose
of TERRORISING them. Mass arrests of young blacks is so commonplace, the
police so hated, that the police force of the entire country has only a
couple of dozen black police officers. Cases involving mass arrests in London
alone- the Mangrove 9, Metro 4, Oval 4, Brockwell Park 3, Swan Disco 7,
Cricklewood 12, Stockwell 10; cases that have involved frame ups and police
brutality, are examples of the extreme harrassment suffered by young blacks.
Individual cases, random street searches and beatings by the police must
run into tens of thousands. |
It is not a question of how many police should
have been there, that is a question for liberals to pick bones over, the
question is: Should the police have been there at all? Only the people who
attended the carnival can answer that. Anyone who attended the event must
have been offended by the sea of police helmets and uniforms, it was after
all a carnival not a political demonstration. |
Let us now look at the fighting
battles. The actual riots were the fiercest and most protracted street battles
on mainland Britain since the 1936 Cable Street riots. Who won? From newspaper
reports it looked as though the police took a real hammering. The battles
that raged that day were not like the usual police vs left confrontations,
more like the Falls Road battles of the early 70's. Police were knocked
over like ninepins by volleys of bricks and bottles (the nearby demolition
sites providing ample ammunition). Baton charges were ineffective in dampening
the enthusiasm of the rioters as they paid the police back for years of
harrassment. Although attempts to build barricades were ineffective, the
sheer hostility and mobility of the rioters along with the constant stone
throwing drove the police back. The police having no riot equipment such
as shields, had to pick up dustbin lids and traffic signs to protect themselves,
police also tried charging the crowds with their vehicles, horns blaring,
but the intense stoning forced the police to abandon some of them, which
were set on fire and several were burnt out. The initiative lay with the
youngsters until midnight, when the rioting petered out. |
In the aftermath of the riots it was learnt
that several shops had been looted, but this was a mere fnnge activity,
involving as many whites as blacks Most of the people there were either
trying to get away from the riot area or fighting the police. The stalls
under the Portobello flyover were not looted, they were smashed up and used
as ammunition. It is interesting to note the large number of hated transport
police that were injured and that a number of their vehicles were burnt
out. (The transport police have been involved in beating up young blacks
and framing them especially in South London). The crack Special Patrol Group
seemed to inflict most of the casualties on the crowd, mostly randomly,
thus helping to spread the rioting, but the ordinary police were hard put
to control the situation. Bridges over the Thames were blocked by the police
and cars containing young blacks were turned back; but it was too late,
blacks from all over London, indeed from all over the country, were at Notting
Hill already. |
The Notting Hill riots were a collective reply
by the young black community to years of police repression. They were not
race riots but ANTI-POLICE riots by (mostly) unemployed, low-paid, young
blacks, the people at the bottom of the economic and social scrapheap. Two
weeks later in Birmingham 300 young West Indians gathered in the town centre
after a youngster was arrested for stealng an ash-tray ; a few days later
50 youngsters stoned police outside their station after people had been
arrested, not dispersing until early morning. It seems that this is going
to become a more common occurance, probably spreading to other discontented
sections of the population. Notting Hill was only the beginning. MPW |
From Anarchy 1976. |