I've been watching the Massachusetts gay marriage
debate. Here's why I'm a bit scared now.
Mandi
Gordey
I'm for gay marriage. I want much more for
my partner and I than the new California Domestic Partner designation. We ran
into trouble the other day at H&R Block. Hertzi filed to get a RAL check
so we would have her refund a bit sooner. Fine. But she can't pick it up for
over a week after they have it in their office because of her work schedule. Can
I pick it up, we asked. No, they replied. Not unless you are a relative. Sister
would have worked. Cousin would have worked. But Domestic Partner ... oh no.
They don't recognize that. No, a manager couldn't help. California Domestic
Partnership registry ... no, they claim they have to follow "corporate rules".
Oh well. We had the same problem at Bally's Fitness. They actually claimed that
if they allowed "gay couples" to use a family membership, that straight people
would pretend to be gay to save the $20 bucks or so each month. Get real.
Now, about gay marriage in Massachusetts. Here's what scares me. There are a lot
of folks who don't give a damn if we have civil unions or domestic partnerships.
But I fear a lot of people who are our silent supporters, large numbers who
would at the moment vote democrat, people who see civil unions as something that
they don't even have to know how to spell because it will never apply to them,
will now be hearing the rights rally cry about the attack against marriage, a
word they know applies to them, and the fear will be put there and they may vote
for bush.
This really gives the hard right something to spin with. The liberal judges who
are taking away the will of the people. That will be where they rally. The
horrible liberal judges. The radical judges. Judges looking at civil rights when
they should be looking at biblical writ. And they will scream that only an
amendment to the constitution of the United States will stop them.
I can hear the bush people now. They will hit the areas ahead of the campaign.
They will go to the churches and the family groups and they will preach about
how if bush doesn't win this year, there will be no one to protect their fragile
marriages by seeing that an amendment is passed to legalize prejudice (not their
word I'm sure) in the constitution by stopping these liberal judges that are
taking away the rights of the people.
I'm also pretty sure that within a few days or weeks, the legislature will try
to get a federal court to block gay marriage in Massachusetts until they get to
have the Massachusetts Constitution amending process go through its chance at
making gay marriage illegal. They will probably even claim that it is only fair
to let them have their way with this, citing fairness to the "people", meaning
to the people who are already on their side. |
|