Mississauga Centre RASC

120th Meeting

                                                      Speaker’s Night  

           

 

Day:                Friday February 6, 2009

 

Speaker:          Dan Falk

                     

 

In Search of Time

 

Dan Falk author of the book “In Search of Time” spoke about time.  Long ago, Augustine said that he knows what time is until he has to explain it. Aristotle noted that time goes by.  Our earliest ancestors, being hunters, had to be aware of time noting the cycles of sunrise and sunset, moonrise and seasons.  Animal bones with notches in rows from France 30,000 years ago may represent a stone-age lunar calendar. At Stonehenge in 2500 to 2000 BC, megaliths were built with the motivation to keep track of time with alignments to the summer solstice sunrise and winter solstice sunset.   At Newgrange, Ireland (3000 BC), a wide shallow mound, sunlight at sunrise shines at the end of the tomb for a few minutes at the winter solstice. 

 

We have been keeping track of time with ever better precision.  Sundials and mechanical clocks measure what happens in the sky. There became a natural tendency to deal with time abstractly. We then think that time moves along independently of anything else. Sir Isaac Newton, in his Principia Mathematica (1687), wrote that there is a true, absolute time flowing uniformly without reference to anything else and gave a definition of “mathematical time” vs “common time” as measured by a clock (which is not perfect).  The Sun moves non-uniformly because of Earth’s elliptical orbit. Thus sundials are not perfect.  According to Newton there is an absolute time flowing uniformly unrelated to the movement of objects and even before the creation of the universe.  Leibniz objected to this saying that surely God must have created time together with the universe.  Another problem with Newton’s equations is that time is symmetric so that it makes no difference which way time flows – this is contrary to our experience of the real world.   Arthur Eddington talked about the arrow of time wherein entropy and the second law of thermodynamics dictate the direction of time flow.   The cosmologic arrow of time causes the universe to expand from very small while the physiologic arrow of time has us remember the past but not the future.  

 

Albert Einstein published his theory of special relativity in 1905, and general relativity in 1915.  The implications of his theories are that time and space are linked, that time measurements depend on speed and that gravity distorts spacetime.  Einstein did thought experiments describing the experience of an observer moving rapidly and that of one who is stationary – each observer sees things differently.  There is no absolute tic-tok everywhere in the world. The universe is not static and it may have had a beginning. He introduced the cosmologic constant to make the universe look static.  But, what came before the Big Bang?  The answer is that there is no time before the Big bang just as there is no north, north of the North Pole.  Time is not defined and it emerges from something such as a particle, or there was an epoch prior to the Big Bang.  Andre Linde in the 1980’s postulated that there is eternal inflation going on all the time or colliding “branes” that release energy causing recurrent big bangs. 

 

Is time travel possible?  We need to distinguish between travel into the future and into the past.  Time travel into the future is not controversial.  One needs to accelerate quickly – as an example, on the space station in orbit around the Earth.  Time travel onto the past could be facilitated by curved spacetime of general relativity.  With a severe curvature of spacetime, travel into the past might be possible.  Dan described the grandfather paradox (someone going into the past, killing his grandfather and not being born) and suggested three possible solutions: 1) time travel into the past is impossible, 2) time travel is possible but you can’t change the past, 3) parallel universes and parallel timelines may allow many possible scenarios, a supposition supported by quantum theory and membrane theory.  

 

Could the flow of time be an illusion?  Julian Barbour, physicist, denies that time flows and says that there are many “nows” with no “flow’ connecting them.  He says that time is a mistake.  D.C. Williams, philosopher, (1899 – 1983) said that time flows only in the sense that a fence recedes. But if time is an illusion, what sort of illusion could it be?  Or perhaps, as physicist Lee Smolin says, we have made a profound mistake and we need to unfreeze time and represent time without space.  

 

 

Chris Malicki, Secretary