Teaser
We are in a legislative chamber, and roll is being called. “Mr. Williams?” “Aye!” “Mr. Willis?” “Aye!” “Ms. Yellin?” “Nay!” “Mr. Zern?” “Aye!” The clerk pauses for a moment before announcing. “By a vote of 112 in favor to 35 against, the Protection of Adopted Children Act hereby passes.” The chamber bursts into applause as we smash cut to:
CREDITS
Act 1
We fade in on the division office. The team is meeting in Jack’s office to
discuss a case file. An adoption is
about to be finalized. Everything
appears to be in order. Amanda
interrupts to note that there’s one more thing to be considered. There’s an awkward silence until she notes
that the prospective adoptive father is gay and lives with another man.
Cut to: Amanda walking up the walk to the house. The potential adoptive fathers greet her on the doorstep. They show her around the home, which is gorgeous and clearly set up for a young child. They explain that they’ve had their foster child, Hannah, for just over a year and there have been no problems. She’s 9, and there are pictures of her hanging all over the place. They explain that because of who they are, they know they’ll never be able to have a biological child of their own, but that Hannah is the closest they’ll ever have. Cut to commercial
Act 2
Act 3
Alice, Amanda, and Terrence gather in Jack’s office to present the case. Amanda and Alice come in, briefly explain their findings, and state that they believe there is no basis for terminating custody. Jack interrupts, asking whether the PAC Act disposes of the matter. “Isn’t it a bright line?,” he asks. “If they’re gay, and they admit they are, they don’t have the right to adopt.” Amanda snaps back at him.
AMANDA
I thought our job was to look after the best interests of the child. What that law requires is that we take Hannah away from the one place she’s known happiness. What that law requires is that we act AGAINST her best interests. Isn’t that supposed to be exactly what we’re fighting against?
JACK:
The law is the law, and it’s our job to enforce it.
AMANDA:
But isn’t there a higher law? I didn’t get into this line of work to take kids out of safe, happy, and healthy homes. I cam here to put kids in those homes, and what you’re asking me to do is contrary to the principles.
Terrence cuts the argument off.
TERRENCE
Enough. Our job here IS to act in children’s best interests. But the legislature, in its wisdom, has decided that allowing children to live with gay men and women is bad for those children. They make the law. We don’t. I’m sure the foster parents will oppose the motion, but I’ll prepare it.
Dissolve to a courtroom.
The court calls the case of “In re Hannah F.” The judge explains that this is a motion to
compel the state to issue a decree of adoption brought by Hannah’s foster
parents, with a cross motion by the state to terminate the foster parent
relationship. The attorney for the
parents steps up and begins to argue:
“This case is not a hard one. The
question is whether the state has the right to take away a child from parents
just because the state does not like who they are. I’m sure you’ve read the
Terrence responds: “
The judge sighs. “I
want an hour to reread
Act 4
We return to the courtroom, where the judge delivers his ruling from the bench.
JUDGE
This is not an easy case by any means. What it does is pit the law passed by our legislature against what I, and apparently some other folks, believe would be a just outcome. The movants have made a strong case that the PAC Act is unconstitutional. (beat) But not a strong enough one. At this level, I must resolve every doubt in favor the state. The state passed a law. That law is clear, and while it may well eventually be declared unconstitutional, it is the law, and I am bound to enforce it. The constitutionality of this law is not properly before this court—my job is simply to apply the law that exists. And that law requires me to deny movant’s motion for custody and grant the state’s motion to terminate the foster child relationship.
He bangs the gavel, as we dissolve to the steps of the courthouse, where the fathers’ attorney is giving an impromptu press conference.
ATTORNEY
We do intend to appeal. It’s our belief that the PAC Act is unconstitutional and a federal court will overturn it. We experienced a setback today, but in every fight, there have to be losses. Today, sadly, was one of them, but it is not the end. I’ll take questions now.
Terrence and Amanda walk down the steps of the courthouse, largely unnoticed.
AMANDA
Think they’ll win?
TERRENCE
Hard to say. It’s not an easy fight. But our job is done. The federal suit will be defended by the state attorney general’s office.
AMANDA
So are you happy with how it came our.
TERRENCE
We did our job. Our job is to enforce the laws of this state. (awkward beat)
AMANDA
I’ve got to get back to the office. I have five investigations tomorrow, and need to get the paperwork together. You headed home?
Terrence nods as he walks away. CUT TO:
Terrence walks into a bar looking wiped out from the long day. The bartender greets him. Terrence asks for a glass of scotch, neat. The bartender pours it for him and Terrence looks down at the glass, staring into it for a moment.
BARTENDER
Something wrong? Bad day at work?
TERRENCE
Sort of.
BARTENDER
Job not go well?
TERRENCE
Job went a little too well.
Terrence loosens his tie, downs the shot, and motions for another one as the camera pulls away and we see that the entire bar is populated with men. Terrence turns away to look at the barroom as a man walks into the room and walks up to Terrence, embracing him and giving him a passionate kiss.
MAN
Everything OK?
TERRENCE
Long day. Long day.
Fade to credits.