![]() |
Each of your essays will be read and scored by two different readers on a six-point scale. The readers are looking for your ability to organize an answer, explain the statement, develop a central concept, synthesize conflicting concepts and ideas, and express yourself clearly and correctly.
Essays receiving scores that differ by more than one point will be evaluated by a third reader who determines the total score for the paper. Scoring is done holistically; the essay is considered as a unit without separable aspects. A single score is assigned to an essay based on the quality of the writing as a whole.
Each essay is judged on its overall effectiveness after the readers determine whether all three writing tasks have been addressed. Mistakes are expected on essays because candidates are writing under timed conditions. Minor grammatical errors will not overly affect the paper's evaluation (see Common Grammatical Errors). The thoroughness, depth, and clarity of ideas presented in the essay will determine the score.
The essay topics will not be controversial subjects such as religion or politics, nor will they be medical topics or topics requiring prior knowledge. The essays are scored on a scale of 1 to 6 (see table below). This numerical score is then converted to a letter score. Failure to respond to any one of the three writing tasks will reduce your score by three points. Copies of your essays will be sent to those medical schools that request them.
Numerical score | Letter score | All 3 tasks addressed | Quality of essay
1
| J - K
| No - may entirely fail to address the topic
| Marked
problems with organization and
mechanics that make the language very
difficult to follow
| 2
| L - M
| No - seriously neglects or
distorts one or more of the writing
tasks
| Problems with
organization and analysis of the
topic. They may contain recurrent
mechanical errors resulting in
language that is occasionally
difficult to follow.
| 3
| N - O
| No - neglects or distorts
one or more of the writing tasks or
presents only a minimal treatment of
the topic
| Some clarity
of thought shown, but may be simplistic.
Problems in organization may be
evident. The essays demonstrate a
basic control of vocabulary and
sentence structure, but the language
may not effectively communicate the
writer's ideas.
| 4
| P - Q
| Yes - moderate treatment of each
| Shows clarity of thought,
but they may lack complexity. Demonstration of coherent
organization although some digressions may be evident. The writing
shows an overall control of
vocabulary and sentence structure.
| 5
| R - S
| Yes - substantial treatment of each
| Shows some depth
of thought, coherent organization,
and control of vocabulary and
sentence structure.
| 6
| T
| Yes - thorough treatment of each
| Shows
depth and complexity of thought,
focused and coherent organization,
and a superior control of vocabulary
and sentence structure.
| |