| When those four concepts, love, wisdom, morality and creativity are taken to be different aspects of the one (sapience), then the
relativity of
conception of each one separate, by different persons, cultures,
primitive or advanced , will be minimized. Because creativity is the same for every human, and it gives all of us a way of determining by its increase if we are being really wise, moral, loving persons. So: If Sapience, (the totality) is to be maximized, then there should be " Creative Wisdom " and " Creative Morality ", as different from non-testable, or authority based, or just so assumed wisdom and morality. If Sapience is to be maximized there should be Wise, Moral, Creative Love, as different from possessive, dependency, jealousy producing, etc. “Love”. If Sapience is to be maximized then there should be Wise Creativity, Moral Creativity, as different from irresponsible creativity. Something creative, means also that the result of applying it would be to some degree or another, observable. We would know that an act increases sapience when creative actions by us or others are the result of such act. Creativity, then, makes our ethics experimental, auto-correcting. Creativity validates ethics for everyone: Non-relative ethics. By the same process, in an iterating way, in an asymptotic curve we would become better and better at evaluating creativity in its longest term consequences. . No system guarantees the certainty that we are behaving optimally, but this one is a feedback loops system. By iteration as it develops, optimizes the methodology and the concepts it is based on. The model of "Ethics of Sapience = Creative ethics", seeks to motivate the person or society applying it, to utilize scientific methodology more and more as the application expands. |