![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||
| Michael's blog about science, culture, and everything in between | |||||
scientists analyse Iraq death toll
The editor of the leading medical journal "The Lancet" has defended a recent scientific study that has come to a somewhat different result to the figures that our governments want us to believe. Read his comment:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1919977,00.html
================================================================= If you would like to add a comment to my blog and don't get a box to type your comment into, go via http://uk.360.yahoo.com/michaelgrr If you want my website instead, please go to: =================================================================
2006-10-13 10:21:17 GMT
Comments (1 total)
Author:Michael
A news feature in today's issue of Nature finds that all experts they consulted have only minor quibbles, but don't doubt the overall validity of the study. Extract:
2006-10-19 12:13:34 GMT
But overall Guha-Sapir says the paper contains the best data yet on the mortality rate in Iraq. And none of the experts contacted by Nature said that their doubts fatally undermined the study. Some, such as Daponte, would have liked the authors to have better assessed their method's shortcomings before releasing a result with such political impact. But most say the result is a welcome addition to conflict epidemiology, which is now seen as playing a central role in assessing the severity of wars, and in helping states recover from them. Full story: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v443/n7113/full/443728a.html |
|||||