back

Hint No. 5 - Historical Comparisons

by Michael Winkler
sent on July 22, 2002

 

They sometimes say “That’s a poor comparison.” Nevertheless, historical comparisons are often used to make certain things explicable. And therefore the idea of comparing historical events isn’t that devious if you consider the fact that human Mankind is simply spoken “stupid” and has hardly learned anything from its mistakes.

To be on the safe side: All those, who find the word „stupid“ offending, can also use the terms „ignorant“, „naive“ or „undeliberately uninterested“. J

Actually, I intended to write about something about possible dangers of the whole „September 11th“ story, but the recently published 50th part of the Matthias-Bröckers-Reihe „The WTC Conspiracy“ (Link: http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/special/wtc/12883/1.html ) forced me to change my mind. One should really take 10 minutes time to read this article (only in German - except the translated part). Call it „scare stories“ or smile about it. However, for me there was sort of a certain (big) discomfort somewhere in my stomach. I’d like to copy (and translate) the first part of this article.

"The stolen elections; pressure on journalists and FBI to stop investigations on the Bin Laden Family; pipeline negotiations with the Taleban until July 2001, admitted 43 million Dollar corruption; secret energy(power)-meetings; 2.1 trillion Dollar missing in the Pentagon Budget – (therefore Rumsfeld declares internally „war“ on September 10 2001) – Bush wishes he were a dictator; he refuses the declassifying of Reagan files, Bush on holiday in August 2001, while Ashcroft doesn’t use public airlines anymore; FBI inquiries to trace suspects are stopped „from above“, the vaunted Secret Services CIA and NSA are simply deserted; not only once but twice Bush claims that he had seen the first aeroplane flying into the WTC (NOBODY else saw it live, the French cameraman who recorded had it, published it only later); Bush listens to fairy tales and flies into a hideout, making sure, that the official version and the laid tracks (Koran in strip clubs, testaments in suitcases, cars “full of evidences”) reach the public consciousness, declares war without approval of the Congress, tries to eliminate Democrats in key positions with US-made anthrax; makes Donald Rumsfeld implicitly claim, that the public is told lies; always appropriate video tapes and statements of the CIA activist Bin Laden; Bush and Cheney heckle Tom Daschle and force him not to continue the investigations on what had happened on and after September 11th; connections of the Republican Party to the Hamas and other Islamic Fundamentalists via their members (associates) Grover Norquist and the Safa Trust; Promotion of the Holy War between Muslims and Jews in the Near East (good for Papa Bush’s Carlyle Group), US installed dictators award the families of suicide bombers; permanent obvious propaganda of the media whores, threats against opponents who ask what Bush knew and when ...

Oh Holy Jesus, you must be brain-dead or an accomplice to believe in something else than that this is the American “Reichstag Fire” and its consequences creates the camouflage, which is used by fascistic Theocrats – the military-industrial complex and rightist Oil Barons to create a new America.”

Markus Bröckers continues: “This was the editorial of the Canadian web-page ‘Print Think’ some days ago. And since this was running down my throat like butter (poor translation, I know, sorry), I ask myself if I might have gone a little bit gaga in this conspirological reality tunnel. For what’s happening if one uses “Google” to check all the aforesaid assertions? This whole list doesn’t get devitalised, on the contrary it gets approved, confirmed, complemented i.e. it ‘s gets even better (or worse – as you like) …” (check “anthrax & Dr. Steve Hatfill”, “Homeland Security”, etc.)

As already mentioned, the whole article you can find under: http://www.heise.de/tp/deutsch/special/wtc/12883/1.html.

Those who can still keep cool after reading it have either „strong nerves“ or a bad knowledge of history.

Have a nice, sunny day. Yours, Michael. 

PS: See you next time.