back

Hint No. 7 - Was it Bin Laden then?

by Michael Winkler
sent on July 26, 2002

 

Due to recent events I would like to postpone the already advertised e-mail regarding “American foreign policy/affairs”. America’s policy won’t change that fast, so it can wait a little bit J

At the beginning of this week a friend of mine sent me the following quotation taken from the well-known German Newspaper „Die Zeit“ (July 18th 2002, ed. 30/2002). For me this wasn’t necessarily something really surprising and in the middle of all this e-mail writing I have probably underestimated the importance of this quotation – but this should be made up for now:

The quotation was found on page 2 – rubric „Words of the Week“: 
"He hadn’t prepared the actions strategically, assumedly he didn’t even know about all the details of the preparations.”
August Hanning (Head of the BND – sort of the German Secret Service – about the role of Osama bin Laden regarding the attacks of September 11th )

She (my friend) continues: “.. it’s really just this little. And therefore it is even more astonishing, that they dedicated just two lines as indemnification for all the wrong accusations to that specific man who was accused to be responsible for the most sensational act of terrorism of the past years.”

Well, one can’t hardly add anything and I am always thankful for such hints. And what does that mean now? If NOT Bin Laden, WHO ELSE DID IT THEN?

Well, the filter methods worked quite good – though there are 2 lines in one newspaper for the official denial and approximately 100,000 lines in 10 newspapers for the accusation. At least, no-one could claim, that the public wasn’t sufficiently informed.

If it wasn’t Bin Laden, was it maybe his twin brother? Did they mistake his identity due to the “flurry of excitement”? We all are just human beings – “shit happens”, doesn’t it? Or must NOT happen?

Those who remember the eminently remarkable essay “The algebra of infinite justice” by the Indian writer Arundhati Roy (e.g. well-known because of her book „The God of the small Things“) published on September 28 2001 (The Guardian, FAZ), will have noticed that the term „Twin Brother“ gets a completely new dimension if you read the whole article (Link at the end of the quotation):

“But who is Osama bin Laden really? Let me rephrase that. What is Osama bin Laden? He's America's family secret. He is the American president's dark doppelgänger. The savage twin of all that purports to be beautiful and civilised. He has been sculpted from the spare rib of a world laid to waste by America's foreign policy …”  (http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4266289,00.html )

Since this whole “September 11th“ story brings, in a certain way, a lot of fun to me, for otherwise I wouldn’t write e-mails in such a „penetrating manner“ J, I would like to continue in this context. As Hermann Hesse once said it significantly: „The world is outside of the madhouses not less funny than inside of them“  (it’s not exactly a quotation due to my loose memory)

Yesterday the following headline on the main page of SPIEGEL-Online attracted my attention:

Scharping didn’t come to Struck’s taking the oath

Peter Struck was put on oath as the new Minister of Defence in the Bundestag (German Parliament). The SPD politician made it clear, that Germany is still prepared for military actions of the Bundeswehr (German Army) abroad.

The article (Link: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,206701,00.html) seems to me as a „normal human being” and yet still able to read, slightly confusing: "… to the critics of military actions abroad within his own Party he [Struck] said: "The attempt to solve political conflicts only with military actions doesn’t normally lead to a sustainable stability, but it is moreover the germ of future disputes. " The crucial point of the German policy would be the prevention of conflicts."

Well, what does our new Minister of Defence or the SPIEGEL want to tell us then? Does he admonish the critics or does he agree with them? What does he actually want at all? What do the critics want? Well, again I had to find out, that the language of the politicians and newspapers is simply too complicated for me to get to the point. J But that’s nothing new, I know.

And all of a sudden something else came to my mind and for some of you it may have come as well. Struck ? Struck ?!? Struck!!! Oh yes, Peter Struck – the „German American“. See also Mail „Hint No. 2“ – „Today we are all Americans!“ (Link: http://www.das-parlament.de/2001/39/bundestag/p_a_44.html).

Well, „September 11th“ really seems to abrogate any natural law. For the first time in my life I really hope, that a politician would NOT remember what he said once. For if he will remember what he said then only one thing comes to my mind: „Good night, Germany!“

I would like to wish you a nice, sunny weekend. Yours, Michael. 

PS: Next time – „American foreign policy/affairs“ – only if Chancellor Gerhard Schröder would announce in the Bundestag, that they had made some tiny mistakes in view of the shocking effects of the terror attacks last year, but still are willing to correct „their mistakes“ till the German elections this September. And I hope, that my friend didn’t just play a trick on me sending this quotation of the BND Head J