News
Release - March 22, 2005
References: Connie Bragas-Regalado, Chairperson,
259-1145 & 0927-2157392
Vince Borneo, Information Officer, 0927-7968198
Gov't
plan to borrow against remittances will not do OFWs, families any
good
Calling
it an economic nightmare, the MIGRANTE Sectoral Party thumbed down
the Macapagal-Arroyo government's plan of raising cheaper funds
by borrowing against expected inflows from overseas Filipino workers
(OFWs).
"Why
is government going to capitalize on the diaspora of Filipino workers
to secure more loans? Since remittance inflows cannot be accurately
charted, getting onerous loans using our hard-earned remittances
as collateral will further bury the Philippines in foreign debts.
This is a complete mockery of all the sacrifices of overseas Filipinos,"
MIGRANTE Sectoral Party Chairperson Connie Bragas-Regalado said.
Finance
Secretary Cesar Purisima is now boasting that "the Philippine
government is to adopt the Mexican tack of raising cheaper funds
by borrowing against expected inflows from OFWs."
"While
the Philippine government boasts of being the world's third biggest
recipient of migrant fund transfers, next to India and Mexico, it
does not give appropriate services and allocations for the 10 million
overseas Filipinos who all contributed to the all-time high of US$8.5
billion at the end of 2004. Now government wants to use our contributions
that keep the stagnant economy afloat to get more loans and push
our people deeper into debt," Bragas-Regalado said.
Purisima
had said he was "looking at seven- to five-year structured
financing through the securitization of OFW remittances, asserting
that some European investment banks had already tried this asset
securitization scheme, involving lending money to banks in Mexico
based on the expected inflow of funds from remittances."
"This
government plan is definitely a speculative venture. No government
can accurately chart the remittance flows since overseas Filipinos
largely use informal channels to send money home. This is due to
the high fees charged by banks amounting to US$6 per remittance.
What government wants is to get fast onerous loans using assumed
remittance targets that is never accurate," Bragas-Regalado
said.
These Latin
American transactions allowed the banks to issue secured bonds before
they actually had the money, based on the expected amount of remittances
that would enter the system through wire transfers, and then reinvest
the money they received.
"Government
should abandon this plan from the very start. The loans that it
wants to get will only further burden the people and will not benefit
the very people's sacrifices and hardships they are using as collateral
- the overseas Filipinos," Bragas-Regalado pressed.
MIGRANTE
also said that the growing migration of Filipinos and its perceived
benefits brought about by remittances does not lead to long-term
productivity, increased wages and employment in the domestic economy."
"The
Macapagal-Arroyo government cannot deny that the loss of Filipino
workers to overseas employment takes a toll on the domestic economy
that cannot be compensated for by remittances. Nor can it be assuaged
by new onerous loans using these remittances as guarantee for payment
and re-investment at the expense of our people," Bragas-Regalado
said. #
|