Letter
to the Editor - May 18, 2005
References: Connie Bragas-Regalado, Chairperson
Contact Numbers: 926-2838 and 0927-2157392
DOLE's Cortazar misses the point on OPAs
We would like to correct the misconceptions and twisted assertions
of Assistant Secretary Jeffrey D. Cortazar of the Department of
Labor and Employment.
In his reply (PDI, 5/16/05) to our letter to the editor published
on May 3, he was actually using his own absurd ideas and words to
besmirch MIGRANTE International and the MIGRANTE Sectoral Party.
Both the MIGRANTE Sectoral Party and MIGRANTE International do
not have a "very low and condescending view on overseas performing
artists (OPAs)" as Assistant Cortazar alleged.
We are only basing our assertions on government's skewed job generation
scheme based on the actual experiences of OPAs in Japan documented
by many non-government organizations (NGOs) and past cases of abused
OFWs in the 23 countries identified by the DOLE as "growing
alternative markets for entertainers."
We also take exception to Cortazar's assertion that composers,
musicians and singers comprise the bulk of OPAs deployed.
Cortazar denies statistics from the Philippine Overseas Employment
Agency (POEA) revealing that 94% of OFWs in Japan are employed as
dancers, and 95% of all these OPAs are women. From between 10,000
to 15,000 women entertainers deployed annually to Japan in the early
1980s, the numbers have risen to between 40,000 and 80,000 yearly
in the past four years.
He does not know that many Filipino OPAs in Japan who were contracted
to work as singers and dancers in performance venues are subjected
to employment contract violations such as being forced to do "hostessing"
work, delayed payment/underpayment/non-payment of wages and overtime
pay, sexual harassment at the work site, no rest days, forced dating
with customers or dohan, and their transfer from one venue to another
-- a practice known as "rebooking" or "flying booking."
While the entertainers trained to work as dancers, choreographers
and singers prior to deployment, their performance is based on how
many customers are lured by OPAs every night. Since a large majority
(86%) of the OPAs receives their salary only at the end of their
work contracts, they are forced to go on dohan requests and commissions
from their drinks for their living expenses and for the monthly
support they send to their families. The situations they are in
make them vulnerable to indignities and exploitation. These are
the many facts of trafficking of Filipina OPAs is. These are what
Cortazar and the Philippine government takes pains to hide from
the public.
The Philippine government cannot refute our claims and the United
States Department of State Trafficking In Persons Report that classified
the Philippines as a Tier 2 - Watch List nation. The said Report
specified that the Philippines 'is a source, transit, and destination
country for persons trafficked for the purposes of sexual exploitation
and forced labor.' This includes those who are deployed as entertainers
and are forced into prostitution with or without government's consent.
To Cortazar's claims that we have baseless allegations and advance
vested interests, we can only say that rely largely on government
data and issuances when we criticize government policies that are
detrimental to OFWs and their dependents. We know what we are asserting
and we are advancing the promotion and protection of our rights,
welfare and aspirations.
This is what Cortazar does not have in mind. He would like to cover
up government's neglect towards the plight of OPAs and OFWs in general.
#