Firstly, I wish to describe my
        Atheism - that is, the way that my mind
        perceives it. It is by no means an academic definition of
        Atheism, but will certainly be quite close to the general
        and accepted view. I believe it is what is known as
        Strong Atheism. Thus: 
        "Atheism for me is the total, and
        absolute rejection of the existence of a divine being.
        This includes any divine beings - be it a divine being of
        Christians, Muslims, Jews or any other religious group.
        There is, never has been, and never will be any form of
        divine being." I could go on, but this definition
        will, for me, suffice. 
        I do not believe that the ancient Jewish Rabbi
        Jesus Christ ever existed, and as more and
        more evidence as to that non-persons non-existence
        becomes generally known and available I am ever more
        confident in that belief. Also, I am positive that we
        need to understand the reality which is in front of our
        own eyes, understand that which is factually verifiable,
        and not be guided by a bunch of ancient middle-eastern
        mumbo-jumbo. The Bible was written by humans for humans
        and is nothing more than that. It is a book. It can prove
        nothing above that which the original writers believed -
        beliefs born of ignorance, superstition and tradition. It
        is quite peculiar that those who profess to be Christians
        only practice their faith within their comfort zone
        of belief. One would expect a true Christian to be out
        there in the world faithfully practising the teachings of
        their saviour, but this is obviously not the case.
        Perhaps there are only a few dozen true Christians left
        on this planet? 
        
        The understanding of scientific literature is
        difficult, for the most part, for most people including
        this writer, to comprehend. Nevertheless, that is no
        reason for not having a good attempt at trying to read
        and understand at least some of it. There are many books
        and documents on evolution, philosophy, science and
        religion available in our local libraries, and on the
        Internet that are written specifically for we laymen.
        Have a go at reading them. By all means read the Bible,
        but try to understand it within the context it was
        written. Do the same with scientific literature.
        Criticise the bible, criticise all scientific literature,
        and criticise evolution but make any decision about them
        on facts, evidence and the truth. Be incredulous. If your
        religion precludes the knowledge contained within banned
        books and documents do your best to obtain and read those
        volumes. Formulate your own opinions and decide for
        yourself why they have been banned. If you are religious,
        read up on the history of that religion and its followers,
        I guarantee that you will be most surprised if you have
        not already done so - especially if you are a Christian. 
        We dont believe, in this day and age,
        that a stage magician can really turn his wand into a
        live snake, or turn water into wine so why should we
        believe it when the same explainable effects appear in a
        so-called sacred text? If it were not so
        tragic, Christian belief even after an explanation of a
        scientific, rational, logical, truthful nature to the
        contrary, would be humorous in the extreme. 
        
        I am Mr. Average. I am 43 (as of the year 1999);
        I live in England - about one hours drive away from
        London. I have a house, car, satellite TV, a microwave
        oven and most of the other consumer goodies. I enjoy
        normal pastimes and pursuits - reading, eating, driving,
        music, listening to the radio, and watching the TV.
        Whilst admitting that I do, along with the rest of the
        human race, have a few faults, I dont consider
        myself particularly immoral. And definitely not in the
        same league of immorality as promulgated in the Christian
        Holy Bible. In most aspects of my life I hope that I am a
        relatively reasonable person. 
        My religious upbringing was one of mild Church
        of England Christianity, indeed I was in the local church
        choir - I was a boy soprano. Funnily, the music that I
        enjoyed singing the most was the section from Stainer's 'Crucifixion'
        where the gathered throng repeatedly proclaim "Crucify
        Him!". I also enjoyed singing at weddings - the
        choirboys were paid a few pre-decimal shillings each. I
        hated Sunday evensong, which was a real dirge. My
        education, I suppose, was quite average, I attended a
        Church of England junior school and later, an average
        secondary modern school. I went to college where I
        studied music. And now, in my middle age, I find myself
        running computer systems. I am not particularly
        intelligent, but I do admire those that are. During my
        later childhood I came to realise that there were no gods.
        There was no kind of anti-revelation, just a gradual
        wearing away of unbelievable beliefs. And now in my adult
        years, as a fairly rationally minded atheist, I can
        easily see what harm and damage organised religions have
        done, and are doing even today as we pass through the
        almost enlightened year of 2000 C.E. 
        I now find it important in my middle age, to
        express my atheistic thoughts, to an audience that may or
        may not appear. It doesnt really matter that I may
        be the only person on the planet to read these electronic
        pages, because what really matters is that my thoughts
        have now been expressed. In some way, I am getting
        it off my chest. I am sick of the bickering in
        Northern Ireland, the disproportionate intrusion of
        religion into secular life, fundamentalism, Jehovahs
        Witnesses, Christianity, fatwahs (SP?), hostage-taking,
        circumcision, churches, mosques, temples, faith-healing,
        the second coming and a whole bunch of other religious
        bunkum. What really makes me sick though - and this is
        well documented - is that in the name of Christianity,
        the religious hierarchy stifled any non-Christian view of
        the world. This happened between (roughly) the years 300
        and 1300 C.E. There were theocratic backed governments
        and kingdoms, education was denied to all but the clergy,
        autopsies were banned, and all of early European science
        had to bow to the incorrect Christian conformity. This is
        so sad. Just think, one thousand years of the dark ages.
        It is about time that the religious leaders of Europe and
        the middle-east held up their hands and proclaimed,
        loudly, that their dogma, their history, their hierarchy,
        their selfish, idiotic beliefs are the reason we are not
        flying amongst the stars. That we still have disease,
        that we have mass overpopulation. That starvation still
        exists, and that slavery existed into the 19th century.
        They should be so ashamed of their wasted one thousand
        years that were forced, unconditionally, onto the fearful,
        innocent public. 
        As far as my lack of belief is concerned,
        common sense is my guide. In fact, I consider those who
        still profess to believe in any sort of divine being to
        be somewhat mentally ill. It seems incredible to me that
        in this modern era, so many people throughout our planet
        are still so easily led, coerced, misguided, cajoled and
        conned by organised religion. Nevertheless, it is not
        hard to see why so many people have their faith. Firstly,
        the indoctrination of the very young - no one is born
        with any form of religious belief whatsoever. The concept
        of a divine being can only be taught, and obviously,
        learned. That well quoted proverb has it in a nutshell -
        Give me the child until the age of seven...
        secondly, the rewards of faith - be good within a
        particular faith and you will somehow be alive after you
        are dead - theres no proof, just a glib promise.
        You will be eternally happy, reunited with your loved
        ones, free of pain or injury, bouncing around gleefully
        on a cloud and strumming on a harp - for all eternity.
        Some part of you will live on. This is a good deal; it
        gives the gullible something nice to look forward to,
        something to hang on to. Thirdly, the sense of community
        - being in an organised religious group brings people
        towards a common goal, be it Muslim fundamentalism,
        Protestant/Catholic approved murder squads in Northern
        Ireland, Christian fundamentalist anti-abortion protest
        or the hijacked Mithra nativity play. In the fourth case,
        some people have no choice of religion or even the option
        of believing or not. The reality of subjugation, death,
        humiliation and religiously inspired torture still looms
        large over some fanatical, medieval Middle Eastern states.
        
        Also, evidence is my teacher, as are thousands
        of years of war, murder, rape and torture in the name of
        religion. In another light, a total lack of real,
        verifiable evidence for even the merest hint of anything
        supernatural is also my teacher. I have no great
        educational learning but I feel quite justified in saying
        that my early education was really stunted by the fact
        that I went to a Church of England school. Being taught
        that the Lord Jesus will be nice to all the good little
        children is not a rational substitute for real history.
        It is but a matter of geography that the vast majority of
        the religiously inclined believe in their personal gods.
        For example, very few babies are born and indoctrinated
        into Mormonism in the environs of Tehran, and no one got
        up and proclaimed "There is no God but Allah, and
        Mohammed is his prophet!" in any of the school
        assemblies that I attended. In the same vein, it seems
        really odd to me that if there really was a divine being
        (choose your own flavour) floating around up there,
        the belief in that god would be genetic. It would have
        been so easy for a god to pass on religion, inbred
        automatically, from generation to generation. There are
        just too many errors in the various bibles. Most biblical
        errors are catalogued and are easily available on the web,
        so no need to bother any readers with them here. The same
        can be said of all the unbelievable biblical claims. 
        I am wondering why are so many members of the
        Christian clergy in the UK, a disproportionate above
        average percentage, are tried and convicted child
        molesters? Every few weeks in the British news media a
        new case comes to light, and it is a trend that does not
        appear to be diminishing - and these are only the
        perverts who are actually discovered and caught. It
        beggars belief. I doubt that there is anyone (apart
        perhaps from the Christian clergy) who would doubt that
        all paedophiles are, in fact, severely mentally ill. Why
        are they like this? Is it something to do with their
        religion? Is it their belief that they have a god given
        ticket of forgiveness? Given the above, it is also true
        that paedophiles reside on both sides of the religious
        fence - Atheist perverts are also a reality - I have no
        truck with either. 
        
        There are a few things that give me hope,
        indeed I am getting a warm and fuzzy feeling inside. It
        seems that religion, at least in the country where I
        reside, is gradually taking a back seat. (Though there is
        still no separation of church and state). The amount of
        people who actually acknowledge to being believers in a
        divine creature is on the decline, I have heard on the
        radio (BBC Radio 4) that it is between 12.5% and 15% of
        the population. The number of church going subjects is
        falling substantially. In fact the media tells us that
        there has been a 22% decline in church attendance in the
        last 10 years, and that the overall regular churchgoing
        figure in the United Kingdom is now under 10% (reported
        as 7.5% in January 2000) of the general population. The
        church going public is suffering a gradual increase in
        average age - take a look at British religious TV
        programming for proof of this. The youth of this country
        are, for the most part, rejecting organised religion.
        Even if we were to overestimate the reported number of
        churchgoers in the United Kingdom, lets say by
        doubling them, it still means the United Kingdom is by no
        means a religious country. In fact religious believers
        would still be in a grossly weak minority. How
        frustrating that level of belief is not shared by the
        Mother of Parliaments. The Christian church in this
        country is becoming divided in what it actually believes.
        Be it the churches attitude towards homosexuality,
        the acceptance of female priests or even the maverick
        clergymen who profess to have no belief in God, there is
        nothing quite like shooting yourself in the foot! For
        example, even as I write, the representatives of 40
        independent UK Christian schools are battling
        in the European Court of Human Rights for the right to
        administer corporal punishment to their pupils. Anyone
        who knows even a minuscule segment of Christian history
        will be surprised that it isnt capital punishment
        that they are fighting for! It is yet another nail in
        their rapidly disappearing coffin of Christian belief. 
        
        The World Wide Web enables almost instant
        access to Atheistic and scientific information. With the
        global communications revolution in the past two decades
        it seems to me that even though the lunatic religious
        fringe are getting their fair share of internet, radio
        and television publicity, they are justly being taken for
        what they are - crackpots. This I believe will ultimately
        filter through to be the general perception of organised,
        stable religions. Without the appearance of a divine
        saviour scourging the planet of non-believers and sinners,
        Christianity is surely going to find it more and more
        difficult to hang onto their faithful followers. How long
        do they have to wait for the reappearance of their Lord?
        We should be told. Is it ten years, twenty, thousands,
        millions? More? The religious fringe prophesies
        concerning the end-of-the-world at the end of the 20th
        century most certainly didnt happen. One wonders
        when those end-of-the-world protagonists will pop their
        heads up again, though I doubt that if and when they do,
        it will be to proclaim their inaccuracy in this instance.
        
        
        Surprisingly, I do have something good to say
        about religion! The music. (Dont be too heartened -
        see below). The Bach B-minor Mass, Gregorian plainchant,
        Verdis Requiem, Janaceks Glagolitic Mass,
        Bernsteins Chichester Psalms and thousands of other
        religiously inspired opuses - not divinely inspired Im
        sure, but definitely driven by western religious belief.
        I do not include happy clappy music in this
        category, apart from its cultural sterility, it is
        just another attempt to climb aboard the popular culture
        bandwagon. They havent fooled me. I would rather
        listen to trad jazz than listen to the
        offering hoisted up for British popular consumption
        during the Xmas of 1999. It is beyond this writer's
        understanding as to why anyone, sane or otherwise, would
        deliberately go out and pay good money to listen to the
        fetid excrement that was the Lords prayer
        grunted, using a fake American accent, to the pentatonic
        banality of Auld Lang Syne. Let us now remind
        the peddler of that childish garbage that his religion,
        his own Holy Book, has something to say about camels and
        the eyes of needles. 
        
        As for death? Well, I wasnt around for
        billions of years before I was born, and I wont be
        around for an even longer time after I die. I exist as an
        electro-chemical being in the 21st century and my only
        fear about death is in the manner in which I will cease
        to exist.