| 
         
      
         
          |  
             ESC 
             
            EMPTY SPACE CHIANGMAI
              | 
           | 
           
               
          
  | 
         
         
          |  
             Good Person of Sezchuan 
             
            Report
              | 
           | 
           
             Rehearsel: Sept 25th, 
              1999 
            Performance: Sept 29th 
              1999
              | 
         
         
           | 
           | 
           | 
         
         
          |  
              
            
  
            | 
           | 
           
             Thursday, September 30, 1999 
              
             
            The performance is over. 
               
             
            Just now we brought the rest 
              of our 13 or more sleepovers to the airport and train station, -- 
              friends who came from far-away Bangkok to help produce, organize, 
              stage manage and cleanup our performance. Silence again. Like a 
              hurrican, this production appeared, made a lot of noise and vanished. 
              What comes to mind first, tired, sitting here, reflecting?
              | 
         
         
          |  
               
               
              
               
              
             
              
               
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
              
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
              
             
             
            | 
           | 
           
             It was a 'workshop performance', 
              to see if Brecht can be adapted to and performed as a Liqai. The 
              presentation was performance-like, included sets, lights, sound, 
              costumes, seats, tents and tickets. We wanted to test our thoughts 
              on a mixed audience. It was an expensive 'workshop'. It went well 
              and was successful. Nobody sad, angry, or disappointed, nobody overly 
              enthusiatic. Now we have to evaluate, listen to our audience and 
              their critic, suggestions. So far on 'village level' we win, -- 
              they like the story, like the performance. 
            It was interesting to observe 
              how our 'neighbors' here in Nongha and 'friends' from Chiangmai 
              reacted to our producing of this event. What was so unusual?  
            We had asked our 'neighbors' 
              20 Bhat for a ticket, children and old people for free and we had 
              asked our 'friends' to donate by buying a ticket for 1000 bhat and 
              bring two friends. We wanted to keep the audience small and balanced.We 
              did not want to approach companies or hotels to be a sponsor. We 
              wanted a group of friends, concerned with culture, art, heritage 
              to contribute in this way. We thought our project interesting and 
              unusual enough that friends would come to see this performance and 
              discuss with us. We all understand that the actors who perform for 
              us can be paid with the income from tickets.  
            It turned out that most friends 
              prefered to donate then to buy a ticket and others objected to ask 
              the villagers to pay, they felt it should be free for them. The 
              farmers were confused that we expected them to pay 20 bhat a person, 
              but they appreciated that we asked children and old people for free. 
             
               
                Our source reports, 
                  that in this area there was no liqai since years, since it is 
                  so expensive for them. If a tempel wants to perform a liqai, 
                  the village collects the money, share the expenses. It amounts 
                  up to 400 bhat a familie, - and here today they are confused 
                  to pay 20 bhat. Curious. We had to rent a tent which costs us 
                  2500 Bhat. We rented it from the village and it was build by 
                  the villagers, still expecting that we perfom for free.  
              
            
            So our thinking failed? Would 
              it be better to ask friends before we start for a donation and let 
              the event be for free? Anyway, most of the thinking was done how 
              to deal with tickets. Now we think we spent too much on poster and 
              printing, simpler would have been enough and cheaper. 
            Another issue became that 
              the performance day was in the middle of the week and many friends 
              have children or have to work the next day, students have examination. 
              Add to this, - the weather, the rainy season is not over and the 
              week before we nearly drowned in rain. We know that we should have 
              considered this more. 
            We just heard tonight from 
              our source in the village, that  
            
              - 
 the villager were not sure if they 
                should spent the money, since they think this is not the best 
                group and they dont know about this new 'german' story. 
                
 
              We had invited a group 
                from outside this circle of villages. Normally if there is a liqai 
                it is performed by Pa Song, whom all respect as the best in this 
                area. We had chosen a young group on purpose. We needed collaboration. 
                The other groups insisted to do the performance without a rehearsel, 
                which we found too dangerous. 
              - 
 we should have started earlier 
                with our PR, by informing the headman and children.
 
              - 
 the poeple who came, specially 
                the children, loved the performance and appreciated the new story. 
                If it would not have rained they would have liked to stay to the 
                end. (most of them could hear the story anyway, while falling 
                asleep, - the speakers were very loud)
 
              - 
 some said they liked to be able 
                to sit, watch and concentrate, not stand in the heat at a tempel 
                fair with so much distraction and noise. We also heard that villagers 
                came from further away villages and looked for a while.
 
             
              
             
            Working on the story 
             
            The final adaptation was 
              done by Egachai the leader of the liqai group who sat for a month 
              and wrote and rewrote what he knew from our adaptations. We typed 
              it for him and he travelled from one member to the next to tell 
              them their part in the story, - no meeting of all together, only 
              at the rehearsel and the performance. That makes it complicated 
              and expensive - old style. 
            We afforded a rehearsel, 
              because we were not sure if we all understand eachother, we wanted 
              to see were we go astray from Brecht's story. The leading actress 
              missed her examination for that rehearsel, since she saw a chance 
              to be a lead after years of 'joker'. She has quit school.  
            After this rehearsel we sat 
              with them and discussed and explained more, then we saw them again 
              for the performance. We were all nervous.  
            It is amazing to see how 
              fast the actor adapted the story and improvised the text for four 
              hours. Sure we could feel were it works and it doesn't, we can feel 
              sloppy acting and good moments where beauty appears, but they went 
              through this play very well. After three hours it started to rain, 
              then thunder and lightning, then blackouts, the audience left us 
              alone, but they performed undisturbed until the end, even when they 
              got the details mixed up. Our audiences seemingly enjoyed and participated, 
              but the late hour and the rain drove them home. 
             
              
            What is the conclusion? 
             
            We had a great experience 
              seeing some of the workshop participants join again, seeing young 
              directors working at different stage with the performers in harmony, 
              a producing team which was intelligent, kind and honest and did 
              not shy away of travelling a few times to come here (BKK - CHM 12 
              hours by train or car and 1 1/2 hrs flight.) 
            All performers and audience, 
              'friends' and 'neigbors' liked this performance. For the friends 
              it was enjoyable to see Brecht's play performed in a local media 
              and it still served Brecht's way of theater. Sure they saw some 
              poor performers and heavy misinterpretation, but generally they 
              saw a way how to continue this experiment. That the villagers liked 
              it is quiet amazing. Normally liqai has a cast of royals or gods 
              in beautiful costumes and gorgeous looking actors. This story talks 
              about them and here in our case the set and costumes were old and 
              the actors not pretty. 
            All performers expresssed 
              that they want to do this script again at a tempel fair next season, 
              they think the audience will appreciate. I would be very happy if 
              this would be the case. Normally liqai group have more or less the 
              same repertoire and the audience knows the stories, - this one is 
              new and they can follow how the drama develops. If this would happen 
              - great. 
              
            What else happened?  
            We had a documentary film 
              team here who filmed our experiment to create a program about liqai 
              - a dying art form worthwhile to be kept alive?  
            We made mistakes, we told 
              the villagers to late, bad PR, the wrong day, the wrong month, for 
              them here the wrong troupe. 
            For a common theater performance 
              we think that this liqai as it is, even polished is not fit. It 
              is too long and to talkative. At a tempel fair there are so many 
              other events happening simultaneaously that it is normal to talk 
              a lot about one subject to make sure even with all the events happening 
              around the audience, they get the story. In a theater we are focused 
              only on to the stage, no other disturbances, so it needs less text 
              and repetitions, but more essence. 
            A dangerous step would be 
              to meet the leader Egachai again, show him the video and suggest 
              to polish the peformance sharpen and shorten it for an audience 
              sitting in a theater. But this is impossible, - all the actors want 
              to earn money. It can only be done if Egachai could find performers 
              who want to go deeper into theater work. Then you have a fine work 
              to be shown anywhere. But even when you do like this you have to 
              test it in other villages. But here I am steppping on dangerous 
              ground, concerning corrupting cultural heritage, so I better stop. 
               
             
            Question: 
             
            when Liqai was performed 
              in village theaters, as they say, that means in a more concentrated 
              space, was a performance as long or shorter then today when shown 
              outside at fairs..  
             
              
            Maybe it would be better 
              to let professional actors evaluate the video and create an adapted 
              liqai version based on our liqai script. If we could invite individual 
              liqai actors to join, that would even be better. 
              
            It was successful enough 
              I think, - we aided a dying art by sponsoring a show, introduced 
              a new story which was generally liked and gave this group a new 
              piece. We animated people, intellectuals and villagers alike to 
              think about performing arts as an entertainment to pay for, to respect 
              the works and join keeping it alive
 
              
            Comment friends, a fine artist, 
              liked how we use a form, long forgotten in his life, to communicate 
              a story of important content. He thinks this is art, it communicates 
              at a direct level. Other theater friends see a chance to invite 
              actors to join with the liqai performers to go deeper into this 
              work and create a version to be send around villages and schools 
              or even to the cities.  
              
            We hope we have a chance 
              to see this production again someday in one of the villages, we 
              hope the participants from here and from Bangkok alike enjoyed the 
              process and the work, we hope that 'professional' actors read this 
              last adaptation and find a way to use this liqai form in another 
              environment. We thank all participants for good collaboration, input, 
              shared expenses. 
              
            We hope to continue... 
             
            PERFORMANCE 
              DAY PHOTOS 
              Back to ESC 
              Back 
              to resume 
               
            
            A review written by the 
              NATION reads:  
             
            Strong breezes rush down 
              from distant Doi Inthanon across a vast plain of lush lime green 
              paddy fields and sweep through powerful columns of teak which hold 
              on their shoulders a beautiful wooden house. This airy home with 
              balconies and walkways linking bedrooms and verandas has a 180-degree 
              outlook on one of the last remaining unspoilt village scenes left 
              in Chiang Mai. Not an electric wire or a road in sight.  
            Manuel Lutgenhorst, his wife 
              Noi and cherubic son Leon (Singh), live in Baan Nong Ha, Sanpatong, 
              over 35 kilometres drive from Chiang Mai. Born in Germany, Manuel 
              has made a career in more countries than most people have been to. 
              He began in New York as the re-designer of Studio54 and worked in 
              various Broadway productions as a designer, director and writer. 
              He has since worked his way across Asia and after ten years in Bali 
              where he built a popular art centre for local and foreign artists, 
              he now calls Chiang Mai home. An easy going, charming and intelligent 
              man, dressed in sabai fisherman trousers and a billowing 
              open shirt, Manuel opened up his home and his vision to me in a 
              recent interview. 
            Having worked with the likes 
              of Bird Tongchai McIntyre on the set of Ku Gam, set 
              the stage for the 1996 Royal Performance for Their Majesties of 
              England and Thailand in Ayuddhaya as well as being the winner of 
              the 13th Asian Games Opening and Closing Ceremony Concept, he is 
              winding down the pace and settling into life in Chiang Mai. In this 
              rambling house perched over a green of paddy fields he has founded 
              the ESC, the Escape Space Chiang Mai, home of all arts.  
            "When I fist moved here 
              I noticed a loud absence of music in the village. Traditional art 
              in most of its forms had appeared to die. Living in Bali for ten 
              years, music and art were never further than around the next corner, 
              but here, I found that although nearly everybody in the village 
              could play an instrument, they just werent doing it." 
              Said Manuel pondering upon the subject. " I therefore bought 
              some old traditional instruments and installed them in one of our 
              open areas beneath the house. Now a farmer may come wandering up 
              from the rice fields for a break and start playing on the saw-u 
              or a worker may stop by after work and play music for an hour on 
              his own before going home. Sometimes we get quite a group here." 
            Often, before Buddhist lent, 
              children from the village would come along to the ESC on a Saturday 
              and Manuel and Noi would provide paints and paper and just let the 
              children spend the afternoon drawing and creating. Artists arrive 
              from Chiang Mai and set up their easel for the afternoon applying 
              with skilful hands what they absorb from sight, both inner and outwardly 
              from the spectacular view. Writer friends of his fly up from Bangkok 
              and from abroad to create in this shanti empty space.  
            "I want this to be a 
              home of arts, any kind of art. It is not an exhibition venue of 
              any kind; its the application that counts. We are process 
              orientated rather than product orientated." Muses Manuel. 
            On the 29th September, Manuel 
              set a stage for a performance which he has been processing for a 
              year. After having been involved as a production designer for a 
              workshop on Brechtian theatre in October last year by Tadu Contemporary 
              Art in Bangkok, Manuel began to develop the idea of translating 
              Bertolt Brechts play The Good Person of Szechwan into 
              a likay folk theatre form. He began to do research into the art 
              and the history of likay and discovered that it was an expressive 
              and important art form which is losing its popularity at a dangerous 
              rate.  
            Likay is a traditional art 
              form of folk theatre. A group of around twenty men, women and children 
              will sing, dance, create poetry and act a local folk tale, a religious 
              story or a Royal myth. The show can often last the better part of 
              the night as actors paint their faces in garish mimics of giants, 
              kitsch renditions of women and clownish masks of jokers. The costumes 
              are shiny, bright, and completely over the top. Although the play 
              is often familiar to both the viewers and the actors, much of likay 
              is spontaneous. Like stand up comedians, the jokers will grasp the 
              latest village news or the most topical subject and transform it 
              into a hilarious insiders joke. Issues of interest will be 
              discussed, dissected and even solutions found as this circus-like 
              art form encompasses aspects of life that villagers can all relate 
              to.  
            Likay was introduced to Chiang 
              Mai in 1927 when Khru Sa-Ing Supit brought the play Sri Prasert 
              for a tour of the north. It reached the height of its popularity 
              in 1957 when in the Sanpatong/Hang Dong district alone there were 
              over 20 groups performing up to 250 times per season (the season 
              being between June and November when there are many, both religious 
              and secular, holidays). Nowadays there are only six troupes left 
              to perform between 30-40 times a year. Television, cinema and music 
              groups have become so popular with their accessibility, and adaptation 
              to the modern times that likay is considered by many to be passe. 
              Traditionally, a temple will hire a likay group to perform for a 
              temple fair. The money donated from people would pay for the performance 
              allowing audiences to watch for free. Nowadays however, with fewer 
              temple fairs, less interest for likay and less money going around, 
              likay troupes find that they need to charge viewers entrance fees 
              in order to watch their performances which people are much more 
              reluctant to do. So, raising funds from friends and organisations, 
              Manuel sought out a local likay troupe and began the process of 
              converting Brechts play, The Good Person of Szechwan 
              into a likay called kon dee muang nuea or the 
              good person of the north. There is not much practising in likay, 
              as improvisation is what brings the same audience back to familiar 
              stories time and again. 
            There were around 200 people 
              in the audience for Saw. Aikachai Likay Troups first Brechtian 
              performance, most of whom were from the local villages but many 
              from Chiang Mai and even Bangkok. The Good Person of the North is 
              a story of a quest to find one true good person, the weight on the 
              shoulders of a good person when confronted with greed and societal 
              pressure and the final reckoning where the God judges whether a 
              good person who does bad things is still a good person or not. The 
              play asks questions about morality in a rustic and rural setting. 
              This appealed to the audience who could relate to the story as well 
              as to the dilemmas. Slap stick humour had the children in stitches 
              of laughter and jokes about the recent bombing in Sanpatong which 
              would have appeared tasteless performed by those unaffected, received 
              wry giggles and chuckles from people who must have know some of 
              those victims. Soliloquies by Gods blended philosophy 
              with country innocence. Bantering by men and women on prostitution 
              and bartering got the crowd cheering and jeering for more. The crowd 
              joined in, the actors lost themselves and sometimes got lost in 
              the characters and even though Bertold Brecht would have had a tough 
              time envisioning this version of his play, he may well have been 
              very proud indeed. It was a most enjoyable evening with Chiang Mai 
              visitors handing out chunks of Pizza Hut pizzas they had brought 
              along to the children, actors occasionally forgetting their cues 
              and being prompted back to action much to the amusement of the crowd, 
              and many outsiders who had never seen a likay performed before becoming 
              absorbed by this spontaneous art.  
            Likay, a dying art form, 
              may have found its champion as well as its future. Should likay 
              be able to appeal to a wider audience, if it could possibly modernise 
              itself as have television, movies and pop culture, then a revival 
              is a very real possibility.  
            Manuel has pledged that he 
              will keep looking for ideas to develop for audiences in ESC. The 
              likay troupe themselves say that they have been very challenged 
              by this project and may very well use this story again in the future. 
              Who knows, Brechts The Good Person of Szechwan may become 
              a popular folk tale in Thailand one day. Manuels next project, 
              which he is interested in doing, is equally ambitious. He would 
              like to form a group of expatriates living in Chiang Mai and get 
              them to use the ESC regularly to write, direct and act the story 
              of Phalkon, Prime Minister of Siam in 1688. "The most challenging 
              part will probably be to get twenty expatriates who will be interested 
              in the project!" Laughs Manuel. He will continue to encourage 
              actors to come and stay in his wonderful house and use it to its 
              best advantage. 
            "The standard of actors 
              in Thailand is generally not very professional yet. Acting is done 
              either for fun or for fashion. Perseverance and dedication is something 
              the acting profession needs to work at." Says Manuel. "It 
              is still a matter of artisans versus artists, symbolic versus creative. 
              In Chiang Mai, I would like to see people be daring and just become 
              artists for the love of it. In the US, theatre is commercial, therefore 
              the quality and standards are very high, in Germany, theatre is 
              part of education and propaganda, and it is therefore embedded into 
              the way of life. In Thailand it is still either farcical in which 
              case it is not taken seriously by either audience or performers 
              or it is mainly religious or royal symbolism which somewhat restricts 
              the artistic creativity. Thai art is very daring though since it 
              is seen as so much fun. So when artists enjoy themselves they are 
              not contrived, they allow their imagination to come forth and produce 
              some very exciting work. The likay for instance, although may would 
              like to call it a profession, it barely pays a living to the performers 
              therefore they see it as fun and it is alive and exciting. This 
              happens a lot in Thai art, many people see it more as a hobby, a 
              fashion rather than a profession. This is both good and bad  
              a lot of great work is produced, but often there is no perseverance 
              or maintenance."  
            Manuel will continue to encourage 
              artists and help them to realise their talents in his windswept 
              house on the edge of a paddy field. 
             
            For more information on Manuel 
              Lutgenhorst and his work, you may visit his web site http://www.oocities.org/mlutg 
              or email him at mlutg@yahoo.com  
            | 
         
       
      PERFORMANCE DAY PHOTOS 
        |  Back to ESC | Back 
        to resume 
        
      |