ESC
EMPTY SPACE CHIANGMAI
|
|
|
Good Person of Sezchuan
Report
|
|
Rehearsel: Sept 25th,
1999
Performance: Sept 29th
1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday, September 30, 1999
The performance is over.
Just now we brought the rest
of our 13 or more sleepovers to the airport and train station, --
friends who came from far-away Bangkok to help produce, organize,
stage manage and cleanup our performance. Silence again. Like a
hurrican, this production appeared, made a lot of noise and vanished.
What comes to mind first, tired, sitting here, reflecting?
|















|
|
It was a 'workshop performance',
to see if Brecht can be adapted to and performed as a Liqai. The
presentation was performance-like, included sets, lights, sound,
costumes, seats, tents and tickets. We wanted to test our thoughts
on a mixed audience. It was an expensive 'workshop'. It went well
and was successful. Nobody sad, angry, or disappointed, nobody overly
enthusiatic. Now we have to evaluate, listen to our audience and
their critic, suggestions. So far on 'village level' we win, --
they like the story, like the performance.
It was interesting to observe
how our 'neighbors' here in Nongha and 'friends' from Chiangmai
reacted to our producing of this event. What was so unusual?
We had asked our 'neighbors'
20 Bhat for a ticket, children and old people for free and we had
asked our 'friends' to donate by buying a ticket for 1000 bhat and
bring two friends. We wanted to keep the audience small and balanced.We
did not want to approach companies or hotels to be a sponsor. We
wanted a group of friends, concerned with culture, art, heritage
to contribute in this way. We thought our project interesting and
unusual enough that friends would come to see this performance and
discuss with us. We all understand that the actors who perform for
us can be paid with the income from tickets.
It turned out that most friends
prefered to donate then to buy a ticket and others objected to ask
the villagers to pay, they felt it should be free for them. The
farmers were confused that we expected them to pay 20 bhat a person,
but they appreciated that we asked children and old people for free.
Our source reports,
that in this area there was no liqai since years, since it is
so expensive for them. If a tempel wants to perform a liqai,
the village collects the money, share the expenses. It amounts
up to 400 bhat a familie, - and here today they are confused
to pay 20 bhat. Curious. We had to rent a tent which costs us
2500 Bhat. We rented it from the village and it was build by
the villagers, still expecting that we perfom for free.
So our thinking failed? Would
it be better to ask friends before we start for a donation and let
the event be for free? Anyway, most of the thinking was done how
to deal with tickets. Now we think we spent too much on poster and
printing, simpler would have been enough and cheaper.
Another issue became that
the performance day was in the middle of the week and many friends
have children or have to work the next day, students have examination.
Add to this, - the weather, the rainy season is not over and the
week before we nearly drowned in rain. We know that we should have
considered this more.
We just heard tonight from
our source in the village, that
-
the villager were not sure if they
should spent the money, since they think this is not the best
group and they dont know about this new 'german' story.
We had invited a group
from outside this circle of villages. Normally if there is a liqai
it is performed by Pa Song, whom all respect as the best in this
area. We had chosen a young group on purpose. We needed collaboration.
The other groups insisted to do the performance without a rehearsel,
which we found too dangerous.
-
we should have started earlier
with our PR, by informing the headman and children.
-
the poeple who came, specially
the children, loved the performance and appreciated the new story.
If it would not have rained they would have liked to stay to the
end. (most of them could hear the story anyway, while falling
asleep, - the speakers were very loud)
-
some said they liked to be able
to sit, watch and concentrate, not stand in the heat at a tempel
fair with so much distraction and noise. We also heard that villagers
came from further away villages and looked for a while.
Working on the story
The final adaptation was
done by Egachai the leader of the liqai group who sat for a month
and wrote and rewrote what he knew from our adaptations. We typed
it for him and he travelled from one member to the next to tell
them their part in the story, - no meeting of all together, only
at the rehearsel and the performance. That makes it complicated
and expensive - old style.
We afforded a rehearsel,
because we were not sure if we all understand eachother, we wanted
to see were we go astray from Brecht's story. The leading actress
missed her examination for that rehearsel, since she saw a chance
to be a lead after years of 'joker'. She has quit school.
After this rehearsel we sat
with them and discussed and explained more, then we saw them again
for the performance. We were all nervous.
It is amazing to see how
fast the actor adapted the story and improvised the text for four
hours. Sure we could feel were it works and it doesn't, we can feel
sloppy acting and good moments where beauty appears, but they went
through this play very well. After three hours it started to rain,
then thunder and lightning, then blackouts, the audience left us
alone, but they performed undisturbed until the end, even when they
got the details mixed up. Our audiences seemingly enjoyed and participated,
but the late hour and the rain drove them home.
What is the conclusion?
We had a great experience
seeing some of the workshop participants join again, seeing young
directors working at different stage with the performers in harmony,
a producing team which was intelligent, kind and honest and did
not shy away of travelling a few times to come here (BKK - CHM 12
hours by train or car and 1 1/2 hrs flight.)
All performers and audience,
'friends' and 'neigbors' liked this performance. For the friends
it was enjoyable to see Brecht's play performed in a local media
and it still served Brecht's way of theater. Sure they saw some
poor performers and heavy misinterpretation, but generally they
saw a way how to continue this experiment. That the villagers liked
it is quiet amazing. Normally liqai has a cast of royals or gods
in beautiful costumes and gorgeous looking actors. This story talks
about them and here in our case the set and costumes were old and
the actors not pretty.
All performers expresssed
that they want to do this script again at a tempel fair next season,
they think the audience will appreciate. I would be very happy if
this would be the case. Normally liqai group have more or less the
same repertoire and the audience knows the stories, - this one is
new and they can follow how the drama develops. If this would happen
- great.
What else happened?
We had a documentary film
team here who filmed our experiment to create a program about liqai
- a dying art form worthwhile to be kept alive?
We made mistakes, we told
the villagers to late, bad PR, the wrong day, the wrong month, for
them here the wrong troupe.
For a common theater performance
we think that this liqai as it is, even polished is not fit. It
is too long and to talkative. At a tempel fair there are so many
other events happening simultaneaously that it is normal to talk
a lot about one subject to make sure even with all the events happening
around the audience, they get the story. In a theater we are focused
only on to the stage, no other disturbances, so it needs less text
and repetitions, but more essence.
A dangerous step would be
to meet the leader Egachai again, show him the video and suggest
to polish the peformance sharpen and shorten it for an audience
sitting in a theater. But this is impossible, - all the actors want
to earn money. It can only be done if Egachai could find performers
who want to go deeper into theater work. Then you have a fine work
to be shown anywhere. But even when you do like this you have to
test it in other villages. But here I am steppping on dangerous
ground, concerning corrupting cultural heritage, so I better stop.
Question:
when Liqai was performed
in village theaters, as they say, that means in a more concentrated
space, was a performance as long or shorter then today when shown
outside at fairs..
Maybe it would be better
to let professional actors evaluate the video and create an adapted
liqai version based on our liqai script. If we could invite individual
liqai actors to join, that would even be better.
It was successful enough
I think, - we aided a dying art by sponsoring a show, introduced
a new story which was generally liked and gave this group a new
piece. We animated people, intellectuals and villagers alike to
think about performing arts as an entertainment to pay for, to respect
the works and join keeping it alive
Comment friends, a fine artist,
liked how we use a form, long forgotten in his life, to communicate
a story of important content. He thinks this is art, it communicates
at a direct level. Other theater friends see a chance to invite
actors to join with the liqai performers to go deeper into this
work and create a version to be send around villages and schools
or even to the cities.
We hope we have a chance
to see this production again someday in one of the villages, we
hope the participants from here and from Bangkok alike enjoyed the
process and the work, we hope that 'professional' actors read this
last adaptation and find a way to use this liqai form in another
environment. We thank all participants for good collaboration, input,
shared expenses.
We hope to continue...
PERFORMANCE
DAY PHOTOS
Back to ESC
Back
to resume
A review written by the
NATION reads:
Strong breezes rush down
from distant Doi Inthanon across a vast plain of lush lime green
paddy fields and sweep through powerful columns of teak which hold
on their shoulders a beautiful wooden house. This airy home with
balconies and walkways linking bedrooms and verandas has a 180-degree
outlook on one of the last remaining unspoilt village scenes left
in Chiang Mai. Not an electric wire or a road in sight.
Manuel Lutgenhorst, his wife
Noi and cherubic son Leon (Singh), live in Baan Nong Ha, Sanpatong,
over 35 kilometres drive from Chiang Mai. Born in Germany, Manuel
has made a career in more countries than most people have been to.
He began in New York as the re-designer of Studio54 and worked in
various Broadway productions as a designer, director and writer.
He has since worked his way across Asia and after ten years in Bali
where he built a popular art centre for local and foreign artists,
he now calls Chiang Mai home. An easy going, charming and intelligent
man, dressed in sabai fisherman trousers and a billowing
open shirt, Manuel opened up his home and his vision to me in a
recent interview.
Having worked with the likes
of Bird Tongchai McIntyre on the set of Ku Gam, set
the stage for the 1996 Royal Performance for Their Majesties of
England and Thailand in Ayuddhaya as well as being the winner of
the 13th Asian Games Opening and Closing Ceremony Concept, he is
winding down the pace and settling into life in Chiang Mai. In this
rambling house perched over a green of paddy fields he has founded
the ESC, the Escape Space Chiang Mai, home of all arts.
"When I fist moved here
I noticed a loud absence of music in the village. Traditional art
in most of its forms had appeared to die. Living in Bali for ten
years, music and art were never further than around the next corner,
but here, I found that although nearly everybody in the village
could play an instrument, they just werent doing it."
Said Manuel pondering upon the subject. " I therefore bought
some old traditional instruments and installed them in one of our
open areas beneath the house. Now a farmer may come wandering up
from the rice fields for a break and start playing on the saw-u
or a worker may stop by after work and play music for an hour on
his own before going home. Sometimes we get quite a group here."
Often, before Buddhist lent,
children from the village would come along to the ESC on a Saturday
and Manuel and Noi would provide paints and paper and just let the
children spend the afternoon drawing and creating. Artists arrive
from Chiang Mai and set up their easel for the afternoon applying
with skilful hands what they absorb from sight, both inner and outwardly
from the spectacular view. Writer friends of his fly up from Bangkok
and from abroad to create in this shanti empty space.
"I want this to be a
home of arts, any kind of art. It is not an exhibition venue of
any kind; its the application that counts. We are process
orientated rather than product orientated." Muses Manuel.
On the 29th September, Manuel
set a stage for a performance which he has been processing for a
year. After having been involved as a production designer for a
workshop on Brechtian theatre in October last year by Tadu Contemporary
Art in Bangkok, Manuel began to develop the idea of translating
Bertolt Brechts play The Good Person of Szechwan into
a likay folk theatre form. He began to do research into the art
and the history of likay and discovered that it was an expressive
and important art form which is losing its popularity at a dangerous
rate.
Likay is a traditional art
form of folk theatre. A group of around twenty men, women and children
will sing, dance, create poetry and act a local folk tale, a religious
story or a Royal myth. The show can often last the better part of
the night as actors paint their faces in garish mimics of giants,
kitsch renditions of women and clownish masks of jokers. The costumes
are shiny, bright, and completely over the top. Although the play
is often familiar to both the viewers and the actors, much of likay
is spontaneous. Like stand up comedians, the jokers will grasp the
latest village news or the most topical subject and transform it
into a hilarious insiders joke. Issues of interest will be
discussed, dissected and even solutions found as this circus-like
art form encompasses aspects of life that villagers can all relate
to.
Likay was introduced to Chiang
Mai in 1927 when Khru Sa-Ing Supit brought the play Sri Prasert
for a tour of the north. It reached the height of its popularity
in 1957 when in the Sanpatong/Hang Dong district alone there were
over 20 groups performing up to 250 times per season (the season
being between June and November when there are many, both religious
and secular, holidays). Nowadays there are only six troupes left
to perform between 30-40 times a year. Television, cinema and music
groups have become so popular with their accessibility, and adaptation
to the modern times that likay is considered by many to be passe.
Traditionally, a temple will hire a likay group to perform for a
temple fair. The money donated from people would pay for the performance
allowing audiences to watch for free. Nowadays however, with fewer
temple fairs, less interest for likay and less money going around,
likay troupes find that they need to charge viewers entrance fees
in order to watch their performances which people are much more
reluctant to do. So, raising funds from friends and organisations,
Manuel sought out a local likay troupe and began the process of
converting Brechts play, The Good Person of Szechwan
into a likay called kon dee muang nuea or the
good person of the north. There is not much practising in likay,
as improvisation is what brings the same audience back to familiar
stories time and again.
There were around 200 people
in the audience for Saw. Aikachai Likay Troups first Brechtian
performance, most of whom were from the local villages but many
from Chiang Mai and even Bangkok. The Good Person of the North is
a story of a quest to find one true good person, the weight on the
shoulders of a good person when confronted with greed and societal
pressure and the final reckoning where the God judges whether a
good person who does bad things is still a good person or not. The
play asks questions about morality in a rustic and rural setting.
This appealed to the audience who could relate to the story as well
as to the dilemmas. Slap stick humour had the children in stitches
of laughter and jokes about the recent bombing in Sanpatong which
would have appeared tasteless performed by those unaffected, received
wry giggles and chuckles from people who must have know some of
those victims. Soliloquies by Gods blended philosophy
with country innocence. Bantering by men and women on prostitution
and bartering got the crowd cheering and jeering for more. The crowd
joined in, the actors lost themselves and sometimes got lost in
the characters and even though Bertold Brecht would have had a tough
time envisioning this version of his play, he may well have been
very proud indeed. It was a most enjoyable evening with Chiang Mai
visitors handing out chunks of Pizza Hut pizzas they had brought
along to the children, actors occasionally forgetting their cues
and being prompted back to action much to the amusement of the crowd,
and many outsiders who had never seen a likay performed before becoming
absorbed by this spontaneous art.
Likay, a dying art form,
may have found its champion as well as its future. Should likay
be able to appeal to a wider audience, if it could possibly modernise
itself as have television, movies and pop culture, then a revival
is a very real possibility.
Manuel has pledged that he
will keep looking for ideas to develop for audiences in ESC. The
likay troupe themselves say that they have been very challenged
by this project and may very well use this story again in the future.
Who knows, Brechts The Good Person of Szechwan may become
a popular folk tale in Thailand one day. Manuels next project,
which he is interested in doing, is equally ambitious. He would
like to form a group of expatriates living in Chiang Mai and get
them to use the ESC regularly to write, direct and act the story
of Phalkon, Prime Minister of Siam in 1688. "The most challenging
part will probably be to get twenty expatriates who will be interested
in the project!" Laughs Manuel. He will continue to encourage
actors to come and stay in his wonderful house and use it to its
best advantage.
"The standard of actors
in Thailand is generally not very professional yet. Acting is done
either for fun or for fashion. Perseverance and dedication is something
the acting profession needs to work at." Says Manuel. "It
is still a matter of artisans versus artists, symbolic versus creative.
In Chiang Mai, I would like to see people be daring and just become
artists for the love of it. In the US, theatre is commercial, therefore
the quality and standards are very high, in Germany, theatre is
part of education and propaganda, and it is therefore embedded into
the way of life. In Thailand it is still either farcical in which
case it is not taken seriously by either audience or performers
or it is mainly religious or royal symbolism which somewhat restricts
the artistic creativity. Thai art is very daring though since it
is seen as so much fun. So when artists enjoy themselves they are
not contrived, they allow their imagination to come forth and produce
some very exciting work. The likay for instance, although may would
like to call it a profession, it barely pays a living to the performers
therefore they see it as fun and it is alive and exciting. This
happens a lot in Thai art, many people see it more as a hobby, a
fashion rather than a profession. This is both good and bad
a lot of great work is produced, but often there is no perseverance
or maintenance."
Manuel will continue to encourage
artists and help them to realise their talents in his windswept
house on the edge of a paddy field.
For more information on Manuel
Lutgenhorst and his work, you may visit his web site http://www.oocities.org/mlutg
or email him at mlutg@yahoo.com
|
PERFORMANCE DAY PHOTOS
| Back to ESC | Back
to resume
|