1-
What is
freedom ?
2-
Where does it come from
?
3- Why we
need freedom
? Can anyone live
normally without it?
4-Today
.. where does the limits
of freedom
reach ?
5- Is there levels for freedom
? which is the best ?
6-
What are the things that stop or limits our freedom ?
(
Place , Religion , Society , culture , rolls , heritage )
7-
Does freedom
needs to be controlled ? who does this ? Is there a
contradiction between religion and culture ? as we all live in Arabic and
Islamic country ?
8- Until which limits the
freedom of a
woman reached
? are we
equal with men ? Do
you really want to be free like a man ??
9- If you are girl
.. do you
think that you are
free ? how ?
do you like it this
way ?
10-
Since we should
be equal .. is
a friendship
relation between a man and a
woman exist ? if
we are equal
then is it ok ? is it
possible ?
why ?
11- If you had children in the future, how will you behave with them ? and
how will you treat your girl ?
12-
What are the advantages
and disadvantages of Freedom
!?
Freedom
Liberty
or Freedom, right of individuals to act as they choose. In this sense, it
is frequently called individual liberty. The term is also employed in
connection with the achievement of sovereignty by a people; when so used,
it is called national liberty. Although in these traditional senses
liberty may be specifically civil or political, the modern concept further
connotes a generalized body of rights, such as the right to economic
opportunity and education.
Rights
and Restraints
Because
completely unrestricted freedom of action would make peaceful human
existence impossible, some restraints on freedom of action are necessary
and inevitable. Virtually all codes of action recognize that basic
limitation. Liberty is defined in such codes as the right of individuals
to act without restraint as long as their actions do not interfere with
the equivalent rights of others; acts that do violate the rights of others
are rejected as license.
Freedom
of expression
Speech,
Freedom of, freedom of expression, both oral and written, from
governmental prior restraint, except as such expression constitutes libel,
slander, obscenity, sedition, or criminal conduct such as bribery,
perjury, or incitement to riot. In the U.S., this freedom is protected by
the 1st Amendment to the Constitution, and is considered essential to the
vitality of representative government. At the core of 1st Amendment
concerns is the protection of expression that is critical of government
policies.
As
with other forms and modes of liberty, completely unrestricted freedom of
expression leads to infringement on the rights of others, and it has long
been recognized that restraints on liberty of utterance are necessary and
inevitable. The nature and extent of the restraints to be imposed and the
means by which they are enforced have constituted important problems in
law and government. Historically, most of these problems have revolved
around the expression of ideas that were antagonistic to prevailing
religious, political, and economic beliefs and institutions, and thus were
adjudged subversive. In time of war, freedom of speech is necessarily
abridged to some extent in the interests of public security.
Freedom
of religion
Religious
Liberty, right of a person to form personal religious beliefs according to
his or her own conscience and to give public expression to these beliefs
in worship and teaching, restricted only by the requirements of public
order. Religious liberty differs from toleration in that toleration
presupposes preferential treatment of a particular creed by the state
because it is an established church or, in some cases, is the predominant
religion of the population.
Modern
Problems
Since
these revolutions, the principal problem with respect to national liberty
has arisen in connection with the struggles of small states and colonial
areas to be free from foreign political or economic control and to achieve
full sovereignty. Closely related to this problem has been that arising
from the efforts of national or racial minorities, such as the French
residents of Québec, Canada, to win political and cultural autonomy
within a country.
Freedom
characters:
Hamer,
Fannie Lou (1917-1977), American civil rights activist who became a
national figure in 1964 with a speech to the Democratic National
Convention in which she recounted the voter discrimination and violence
against blacks in her home state of Mississippi. Hamer became a national
symbol of the participation of poor Southern blacks in the civil rights
movement.
|