Out Of
Sight
Directed
by Steven Sodernergh
Screenplay
by Scott Frank
Based
on the novel by Elmore Leonard
Starring
George Clooney, Jennifer Lopez, Ving Rhames, Don Cheadle, Dennis Farina,
Albert Brooks, and Steve Zahn
123
minutes. Rated R. Original aspect ratio: 1.85:1. 1998
A truly great and vastly unappreciated film, Out of Sight received
well-deserved nominations at the 1998 Oscars for best editing and best
adapted screenplay. The fact that it won neither of these awards is merely
adding insult to the injury that Steven Soderbergh was not nominated for
best director and that the film itself was not nominated for best picture.
Those of you who read my review of John Carpenter's Christine know
how I like to approach movies that are based on films. That’s what I did
in the case of Out of Sight, and right there it’s easy to see why
it was nominated for best adapted screenplay - the screenplay is simply
better than the novel, the latter written by pulp fiction master Elmore
Leonard. The characters are better defined (though I must admit, a lot
of that comes from top-rate performances by George Clooney and Jennifer
Lopez, as well as the great supporting cast including Ving Rhames, Steve
Zahn, and Don Cheadle), the action is tighter and more interesting, and
the film ends - well, not exactly on a high note, but on a higher note
than the novel did. Ending on a high note isn’t necessarily always a good
thing (just compare the awful theatrical release of Blade Runner
to the awe-inspiring director’s cut), but in this case I think it’s necessary.
Out
of Sight is hardly a Blade Runner. It’s a romance, and a romance
needs some sense of hope at the end to be effective.
The film
itself is an incredible piece of work. Painted in either the harsh, overexposed
glare of Florida or the drab, colorless wasteland of Detroit, Soderbergh
uses a very interesting visual style to tell this stylish romance, a style
that includes using a good number of flashbacks (the film was originally
written to unfold in chronological order, but with that being the case,
we don’t meet Karen Sisco until halfway through the film) and occasionally
freezing the image (hence, I’m sure, the film’s nomination for best editing).
It was interesting to notice that the last place Soderbergh used the freeze
frame was in the
love scene between Foley
and Sisco. According to Soderbergh, he felt that by that point they had
gotten the story “caught up.” Very interesting.
The acting, as I mentioned above, is very memorable and effective. Perhaps
not Oscar-worthy, but definitely noteworthy performances from Clooney and
Lopez make this film all the more enjoyable. Their on-screen chemistry
out shines even that of Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan (in the various films they’ve
done together, the most recent being of course the charming You’ve Got
Mail). They have a good rhythm going on here, and it’s a joy to simply
watch these two performers act with and against one
another.
The supporting cast is likewise great. Don Cheadle especially impressed
me. He was able to be funny one moment and absolutely ruthless and chilling
the next. Ving Rhames has always been a favorite actor of mine - the banter
between him and Clooney is almost as fun to watch as that between Clooney
and Lopez - and Steve Zahn is a great character actor who brings a lot
of the humor to this piece.
I’m not
saying Out of Sight should have won best picture or best director.
Those should have both gone to Spielberg, I think, with the former maybe
going to Elizabeth. Maybe. But a nomination was certainly deserved
(as it was for The Truman Show, another great film jilted at the
Oscars this year), and I think that the writing nomination at least should
have gone to the extremely talented Scott Frank, who took a fun, well-written
book and made it even better.
Bottom line: A wonderfully written, acted, and directed film that has gone
vastly unappreciated.
My grade:
A
My advice:
Ignore the fact that it was a flop at the box office, and go rent this
wonderful romance today.
Get the movie
poster!