Star Wars: Episode I
The Phantom Menace
Written and directed by George Lucas

Starring Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman, Jake Lloyd, and Ian McDiarmid
131 minutes. Rated PG. Original aspect ratio: 2.35:1. 1999
The much uglier movie poster
    Okay. Before I begin here, let me tell you where I'm coming from. I have been a fan of Star Wars for many years. I collect the original action figures and Marvel comic books. I own the letterboxed versions of the original and the Special Edition versions of the films. And I was excited as the next guy when I sat down on May 19th to behold The Phantom Menace. But Star Wars for me was not the life-changing experience it apparently was for so many people. They're just movies. Movies I enjoy immensely, but mainly as escapist fantasy. There are many movies I like much more, and many movies which are much, much more important. But they are great films, I like them a lot, and I was, as I said, excited on the 19th to be sitting in that theatre, even though I did not have the ridiculously high expectations as, say, the guy dressed in the Jedi robes sitting in the row in front of us.

Blam, blam!    Now. The Phantom Menace. I am loathe to do this, but after seeing it twice and letting it sink in, I have to say I was disappointed. While the other Star Wars films were always kid-friendly, this one seems specifically aimed at children. A lot of the film was painfully juvenile. But aside from that, the script was weak, there wasn't a whole lot of emotion from the characters, it was lacking in tension, and the computer effects were waaaaaay overused.
Natalie's crib from the front...    The juvenile part comes from, of course, the loathsome creature Jar Jar Binks and his fellow Gungans. What the hell was Lucas thinking? I had my reservations about Jar Jar before I even saw the film, and the moment - the very moment - it appeared on-screen I knew my apprehension was well-founded. Never have I seen a more annoying, ridiculous, un-funny, or just plain useless character as Jar Jar. "Yousa people gonna diieeeeee?" Gag me. The Gungans themselves were necessary to the plot, but why did they have to be so silly and obnoxious? And why did they have to be computer generated? It would not have been a problem to create make-up effects for the Gungans, make-up effects that would have looked a hell of a lot more realistic than the rubbery computer-generated Gungans.
...and from the rear...    But therein lies the heart of the problem with The Phantom Menace. I think Lucas has spent so much time working with computers that he's forgotten what it's like to work with real actors, and real human emotion. That is why, I think, the script is lacking any emotion, depth, or tension; and that is why, I think, Lucas has directed the actors to mostly stand around and look grim. It can't be the fault of the actors, not with an incredible cast like Neeson, McGregor, and Portman. Newcomer Lloyd, in fact, has the most to do (maybe because the film is aimed at kids his age), and he does a great job as Anakin Skywalker. ...and from waaaaaaay up high.But Neeson never really gets a chance to show us what he can do, and McGregor (who really is underused in this film) only gets one chance to really even act. Portman is effective, but the makeup and the bizarre accent she adopts blunts a lot of her charisma and natural beauty (clearly evident in films such as The Professional, Beautiful Girls, and the all-mighty Heat). McDiarmid, though, is extremely effective as Senator Palpatine, and though it may not be immediately evident, this film is really his story anyway.
Fear leads to anger...or something    Now. The computer effects. When used for special effects or creating alien landscapes, they work extremely well, and you can't tell that you're watching CGIs. But when used for characters (i.e., Jar Jar, the podracer Sebulba, or the slave owner Wattoo) it's clear they're fake. Actually, to be honest, Wattoo doesn't look too bad. And computer effects haveThe boy is dangerous!improved over the last few years. Just compare the Jabba the Hutt in the Special Edition to the one who makes a cameo here. He still looks rubbery, but he looks a lot better than he did in the Special Edition. But he still doesn't look like the "real" Jabba, that is, the giant puppet that appeared in Return of the Jedi. But the space battle, the battle droids (whose voices suck more of the maturity and credibility out of the film), the pod race, and the landscapes such as Tatooine and Courscant look great.
Amidala and her buddies    The tension in the film, though, is lacking. The pod race is exciting, but not all that tense (and don't tell me it's not tense because the viewer can pretty much guess at the outcome - a good director can make a sequence tense even if you've seen it before. The final battle scene in The Hunt For Red October is tense every time I watch it, and I've lost count of how many times I have). And the script fails to build tension in the climax - there's none of the back and forth dialogue between the Naboo pilots that worked so well to build tension in the battle scenes in the previous films. Plus, the space battle is kind of glossed over, and not developed in detail the way the ones in A New Hope and Return of the Jedi were.
Pchew! Pchew!    I'd have to say that the centerpiece of this film is the lightsabre duel. That sequence, set to John William's brilliant "Duel of the Fates," is extremely tense and effective. Ray Park, the actor who plays Darth Maul - who's makeup is startlingly effective, but not particularly subtle (and before you throw Darth Vader's mask at me, that was subtle, because it wasn't the mask that was frightening, it was the possibility of what was behind it) - is a skilled martial arts expert and helps to make the duel between Maul and the combined force of Qui Gon (Neeson) and Obi Wan (McGregor) fast, exciting, tense, and fast (yes, I know I used "fast" twice).
Run, Obi-Wan, run!    As much as I'm bitching, there is much to applaud about The Phantom Menace. It carries the Star Wars essence in spades, and the effects are mind-blowing. And as weak as the script is, it does have it's strengths. As for all Nano nanothe problems with the film, well, I think a lot of that can be explained by saying that Lucas has been away from filmmaking for so long (with the exception of producing and second-unit directing), and that his next script - and directing effort - will be much stronger. Also, I'm hoping that the oversaturation of computer effects is merely the symptom of a kid with a new toy, and that the effects will be toned down somewhat in Episodes II and III.
Vroom, vroom!    There's much hope for Episodes II and III. Episode I was necessary, for several reasons. It was necessary to (spoiler ahead: highlight only if you've seen the film or don't care) bring Palpatine - who, in case you didn't realize, is also Darth Sidious - to power (he later becomes the Emperor), and it was necessary for Lucas to get back into the game, and to perhaps get using all the computer effects (which at times is so overwhelming it's like watching a video game) out of his system. But Episode II is a romance, and Episode III is Anakin's fall from grace, so I think there are much more serious themes and issues for Lucas to develop in those films, and also a chance to return to the seriousness and maturity which made the first trilogy great.

    Bottom line: A weak script, poor use of great actors, and an oversaturation of computer effects. But you know what? It's still Star Wars.
    My grade: B+
    My advice: Don't wait for video.

Get the movie poster!