Book Review by Dr. Mubarak Ali
A
new History of India To
write a history of 4000 years of India, covering its political, social,
cultural, and economic development, incorporating all recent research
which has taken place in various aspects, and relating all periods with
each other to make the continuity of historical process, is an uphill
and arduous task. Stanley Wolpert has successfully accomplished this
task in his ‘ A new History of India’ which was first published in
1977. Such a comprehensive book requires periodising the historical
process mentioning changes that shaped social, political, cultural, and
economic fabric of a society. The saga of the Indian history begins with
the Indus valley civilization whose silent sites spread all over Sindh,
Baluchistan, Pubjab, Rajasthan, and Gujrat. The excavations of these
sites tell a story of glorious civilization that made India parallel to
Egyptians and Mesopotamian civilizations. The
center of the Indian civilization then shifted from Sindh to the
Gangetic plains on the arrivals of new ethnic groups known as the
Aryans. They brought new gods, new language, caste system, and
patriarchy. As a result of socio-economic and political development
simple tribal society became engaged in the process of state formation.
They built an empire known as an ‘Arya Verta’ or the land of the
Aryans. Its capital was Hastinapur (pur i.e. fortified town). Among the
institutions of the state important ones were the king, army (kshatriyas),
sabha or samiti (councils). In the plains of Ganges and Yumuna, the
Aryan civilization developed into a complex one. The first Aryans who
settled in the Punjab had great optimism in their outlook, but once they
shifted to the dark woods of Bihar, their philosophy became pessimistic,
especially about sufferings of life and how to get salvation. The
complexities of religious rituals made Brahman superior caste to the
warriors. To maintain their domination, the Brahmans evolved so many
rituals that to pay their cost became unbearable for the people. Gutanma
Buddha (563 B.C.) was the first who challenged the Brahmanism and
emphasized on virtuous conduct, non-violence, and poverty. The other
apostle was Mahavira (540 B.C.) who preached ‘Ahimsa’ both
philosophies greatly influenced in shaping the mind of the Indian
society throughout the history. On the one hand there was philosophical
development, while on the other hand the first great Maurya empire
emerged under Chandraguta whose advisor Kautilya wrote the famous book
‘Arthashastra’ containing the principals of ‘Realpolitick’. His
successor, Asoka made Buddhism a universal religion. The emergence of
Gupta reversed the cycle of history. Brahmanism again assumed the
ascendancy and nearly wiped out Buddhism from India. A new
phase of history began when the Arabs conquered Sindh in 711 A.D.
However, the Arab conquest remained confined only to Sindh, the region
changed its social and cultural pattern under the influence of new
religion. For three centuries there was no new conquest of India by the
foreigners. However, during this period, Central Asian Turks were
converted to Islam. A new wave of invasion began with the advent of the
Ghaznavid Empire. It was followed by the Ghorids.The Sultanate period
began with Qutbuddin Aibak (1206-1210). The main characteristics of this
period were that it ended the feudalism and established a strong central
government. With the introduction of Persian language, a new and dynamic
culture developed under the patronage of the sultans. The Mughals who
succeeded them promoted the Persian-Central Asian culture. Akbar,
following the philosophy of Sulh-i-kul (peace with all), Indianised the
state institutions and treated his subject on the basis of equality
irrespective of their religion. The Mughal culture continued even after
their decline in the regional states. The
European traders who arrived in India in the 15 and 16 centuries, taking
advantage of political fragmentation, involved in local conflicts. The
East India Company that was founded in 1600 A.D. assumed political power
after the battles of Plassy and Buxer.The Indian conquest thrilled the
Englishmen. They wanted to modernize it on their own model. An age of
Reform initiated in 1930s which upset the established traditions and
institutions. As a reaction the Great Revolt of 1857 occurred. The
result was that on the one hand the rule of the Company came to an end
and India came under direct control of the crown, on the other hand it
also ended the Mughal rule. India became a part of the British Empire.
The British had learnt a lesson from the revolt. That is why they
changed their policy to rule India. 560 Indian states were given
guarantee to remain independent in their internal affairs. The ratio of
the Indian was reduced in the army. The feudal class was promoted as the
loyalists to the empire. Policy of isolation was adopted and the British
had their own residential areas and clubs. When
the nationalist movement started, it heavily borrowed its symbols from
the Indian past. Gandhi was inspired by Buddha and Mahavir and adopted
ahimsa or nonviolence to fight against the mighty empire. Common people
were inspired by the slogan of ‘Ram Rajiya’which was used during the
Bhakti movement by Tulsi Das.The ‘swaraj’ was taken from Shivaji.The
Hindu nationalist leaders revived the old Hindu festivals and rituals to
involve people in the process of struggle. On this stage, the Muslim
community of India differed with these symbols that created a gulf
between these two communities. This consequently caused partition of the
India subcontinent. There
were two different plans to develop India after the independence.
Gandhi’s vision was to revive the Indian rural past while Nehru wanted
to adopt the modern European model for economic development. The strong
center and planned economy was the programme on which modern India
developed. What we
learn from reading the history of India is that in spite of all
vicissitudes, changes, and developments, there is continuity of the
Indian traditions. The arrivals of the foreign nations, their culture,
and modernization process fail to suppress or eliminate the traditional
continuity of India. Its soul remains alive. Wolpert
brings the narratives up to the present. The reading of the last chapter
poses the question as to how India is changing as a result of coming BJP
to power? Could India sustain its secularism, democracy, plurality and
tolerance or succumb to communalism and discrimination and caste
prejudices? By
reading comprehensive history and by understanding the change give
historical consciousness that is essential to comprehend not only the
process of history but also a society and its people. Wolpert does not
adopt any particular interpretation like nationalist, Marxist, or
Subaltern, but narrates the history with objectivity.
|