On Sept. 28, 2001, NCCDS received the following answers to our concerns 
regarding the PEP requirements. The responses were written by Dr. Henry 
Johnson, Associate Superintendent of the NC Dept. of Public Instruction:
 
1) How does DPI ensure the PEP is successfully implemented? 
Since implementation of the PEP is a local responsibility, DPI monitors outcomes
based on student achievement data rather than process. We established a
procedure for LEAs to report the percent of students at the "gateway" years who
are promoted after each administration of the EOGs. For the 2000-2001 year, we
are required to report grade 5 data only. This information will be reported to
the Legislative Study Commission on Improving Performance of At-Risk and
Minority Students. 
 
2) How does DPI sanction systems that don't comply? 
Currently, there are no sanctions in place for local school personnel. However,
recent legislation requires that DPI develop a "closing the gap" component for 
the accountability program. Performance of students below grade level is likely
to be one of the reported factors. Results of school performance on this
component will be reported for all schools. Other recent legislation requires
schools to develop PEP for appropriate students in grades 3-8, not just in
gateway years. 
 
3) What remedies do parents or teachers have when a school or LEA does not
comply. 
If a school official intentionally disregards a statute of the General Assembly
or a State Board policy or local board policy, the individual could be subject
to " grounds for dismissal " under 115C-325(e) (1)i and part j.