When standardized
test scores are low, schools often use them to determine whether or not
a student should pass on to the next grade with his or her peers.
The benefits of repeating a grade do not outweigh the costs. Short-term
improvements are lost as new material is presented.
Not only is this
practice ineffective at improving academic performance, it can have long-term
harmful effects on a student’s social, emotional, and academic outcomes
such as:
· Reduced confidence
and self esteem,
· Increased
behavior problems
· Higher dropout
rates
· Lower academic
and employment outcomes
· Decreased
likelihood of receiving a diploma or going on to college
· Lower pay
per hour
A very important study by Jimerson (1999) followed kids for 21 years. It included students who were held back in school, low-achieving students who were not held back, and control (average) students. It showed that students who are held back had a higher probability of poorer educational and employment outcomes during late adolescence. The low scoring students who were not held back turned out no different from the average scoring students. This means that even students who have low scores can eventually catch up to their higher scoring peers!
Why is it so important for students not to be held back?
During childhood and
adolescent development, social and emotional adjustment can be extremely
important. Being a part of a peer group has implications for social
development that extend into adulthood. Academics are not the only
factor in adult success. When children are held back in school they
don’t remain with the same peer group, which makes social adjustment more
difficult. Emotionally, they feel inferior to others. They
lose motivation to try in school because they have already been labeled
as incompetent. This is likely to lead to higher dropout rates and
poorer grades. Without emotional and social stability, kids don’t
do well in school, no matter how smart they are or how well taught.
These problems are even more difficult to address once a student reaches
adolescence. Parents and teachers can’t afford to wait until middle
school or high school to solve these problems.
Prevention, Intervention, and Alternative Solutions
How can we prevent kids from getting behind in school? One way is to know who is most likely to have problems. Studies have shown several predictors of students being held back in school such as:
· Low test scores
and grades at early levels
· Boys are
more likely than girls to be held back
· Low parental
involvement in child’s education
· The number
of times a child has changed schools
If we know what to look for, we can be more successful at preventing low grades and scores instead of trying to improve them later. These predictors tell us that we should intervene at earlier grades, pay more attention to boys with academic problems, increase parental participation and involvement, and provide attention to and adjustment for kids who have changed schools. It is tough for teachers to get parents involved, sometimes especially the ones whose children perform poorly.
Psychologists and educators have offered many Alternative Solutions such as:
· Improving
and increasing professional development for better teacher performance
· Providing
targeted and timely support to students with academic problems
· Interaction
with students of varying ages and achievement levels
· Restructuring
the curriculum of early grades to reflect the developmental stages of learning
· Providing
extra assistance programs such as tutoring, classroom interventions, and
special programs
· Increasing
the influence teachers have in the decision making process and understanding
the influence of state and local school policies on these decisions
· Adopting
an orientation toward learning and student progress with consideration
to the rate and manner in which children naturally learn.
For example: Using
the amount of progress a student has made over the year as the basis of
achievement evaluation.
Teachers know their students on a much closer level than standardized tests do!
Sources:
NCCDS
Back to the main page.
This page last updated June 15, 2000.