To access Index go to bottom of page and click on "home".
GNANI YOGI
THE FIRST LESSON
THE ONE
by
YOGI LOPRAMACHARAKA
(Note; these lesson were published in 1906 )
Next, the Intellect informs us that it must think of the Absolute as
Infinite in Space - present everywhere - Omnipresent. It cannot be limited,
for there is nothing outside of itself to limit it. There is no such place
as Nowhere. Every place is in the Everywhere. And Everywhere is filled with
the All - the Infinite Reality - the Absolute.
And, just as was the case with the idea of Time, we find it most
difficult - if not indeed impossible - to form an idea of an
Omnipresent - of That which occupies Infinite Space. This because
everything that our minds have experienced has had dimensions and limits.
The secret lies in the fact that Space, like Time, has no real existence
outside of our perception of consciousness of the relative position of
Things - material objects. We see this thing here, and that thing there.
Between them is Nothingness. We take another object, say a yard-stick,
and measure off this Nothingness between the two objects, and we call
this measure of Nothingness by the term Distance. And yet we cannot have
measured Nothingness - that is impossible. What have we really done?
Simply this, determined how many lengths of yard-stick could be laid
between the other two objects.
We call this process measuring Space, but Space is Nothing, and we have
merely determined the relative position of objects. To "measure Space"
we must have three Things or objects, i.e., (1)The object from which we
start the measure; () The object with which we measure; and (3) The object
with which we end our measurement. We are unable to conceive of Infinite
Space, because we lack the third object in the measuring process - the
ending object. We may use ourselves as a starting point, and the mental
yard-stick is always at hand, but where is the object at the other side
of Infinity of Space by which the measurement may be ended? It is not
there, and we cannot think of the end without it.
Let us start with ourselves, and try to imagine a million million miles,
and then multiply them by another million million miles, a million million
times. What have we done? Simply extended our mental yard-stick a certain
number of times to an imaginary point in the Nothingness that we call
Space. So far so good, but the mind intuitively recognizes that beyond
that imaginary point at the end of the last yard-sticks - an infinite
capacity for such extension. Extension of what? Space? No! Yard-sticks!
Objects! Things! Without material objects Space is unthinkable. It has
no existence outside of our consciousness of Things. There is no such
thing as Real Space. Space is merely an infinite capacity for extending
objects. Space itself is merely a name for Nothingness. If you can form
an idea of an object swept out of existence, and nothing to take its
place, that Nothing would be called Space, the term implying the
possibility of placing something there without displacing anything else.
Size, of course, is but another form of speaking of Distance. And in this
connection let us not forget that just as one may think of Space being
infinite in the direction of largeness, so may we think of it as being
infinite in the sense of smallness. No matter how small may be an object
thought of, we are still able to think of it as being capable of
subdivision, and so on infinitely. There is no limit in this direction
either. As Jakob has said: "The conception of the infinitely minute is
as little capable of being grasped by us, as is that of the infinitely
great. Despite this, the admission of the reality of the infinitude, both
in the direction of greatness and of minuteness, is inevitable." And, as
Radenhausen has said: "The idea of Space is only an unavoidable illusion
of our Consciousness, or of our finite nature, and does not exist outside
of ourselves; the universe is infinitely small and infinitely great."
The telescope has opened to us ideas of magnificent vastness and greatness,
and the perfected microscope has opened to us a world of magnificent
smallness and minuteness. The latter has shown us that a drop of water is
a world of minute living forms who live, eat, fight, reproduce, and die.
The mind is capable of imagining a universe occupying no more space than
one million-millionth of the tiniest speck visible under the strongest
microscope - and then imagining such a universe containing millions of
suns and worlds similar to our own, and inhabited by living forms akin to
ours - living, thinking men and women, identical in every respect to
ourselves. Indeed, as some philosophers have said, if our Universe were
suddenly reduced to such a size - the relative proportions of everything
being preserved, of course - then we would not be conscious of any change,
and life would go on the same, and we would be of the same importance to
ourselves and to the Absolute as we are this moment. And the same would be
true were the Universe suddenly enlarged a million -million times. These
changes would make no difference in reality. Compared with each other, the
tiniest speck and the largest sun are practically the same size when
viewed from the Absolute.
We have dwelt upon these things so that you would be able to better
realize the relativity of Space and Time, and perceive that they are
merely symbols of Things used by the mind in dealing with finite objects,
and have no place in reality. When this is realized, then the idea of
Infinity in Time and Space is more readily grasped.
As Radenhausen says; "Beyond the range of human reason there is neither
Space nor Time; they are arbitrary conceptions of man, at which he has
arrived by the comparison and arrangement of different impressions which
he has received from the outside world. The conception of Space arises
from the sequence of various forms which fill Space, by which the external
world appears to the individual man. The conception of Time arises from
the sequence of the various forms which change in space (motion), by which
the external world acts on the individual man, and so on. But externally
to ourselves, the distinction between repletion of Space and mutation of
Space does not exist, for each is in constant transmutation, whatever is
is filling and changing at the same time - nothing is at a standstill,"
and to quote Ruckert: "The world has neither beginning nor end, in space
nor in time. Everywhere is centre and turning-point, and in a moment is
eternity."