THE BIBLE RETOLD 27




EXODUS CONTINUED





37: And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, beside children. 38: And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, even very much cattle.

The first thing to look at here is the name of Rameses. This name is after the time of the Hyksos. Since I am claiming that the Hyksos were the remnants of the people of Ur, then the name could well be from those people. The word "Ram" in his name has never really been looked at very closely. It denotes a connection to shepards and sheep. We have only two mentions of the name of Succoth in the Bible. It's placement is unknown. There is no record in Egyptian history of this place. Why? They retained the names of their towns or cities down to later times.I believe Succoth was in the vicinity of Ur.

We have 600,000 men and lets say about 400,000 male children. There must have been at least 500,000 women at the least amount. This makes 1,500,000 at least of humans, not counting the extra people that decided to go along with them. They also took with them flocks and herds. Lets say at the least one animal for every human. Making over 3 million bodies that are on this march! Please keep that in mind.

17: And it came to pass, when Pharaoh had let the people go, that God led them not through the way of the land of the Philistines, although that was near; for God said, Lest peradventure the people repent when they see war, and they return to Egypt

How could they have passed through the land of the Philistines before they came to the area of the parting of the waters? Until then they were still supposed to be in Egypt! I do not think that the land of the Philistines could have been in the area of the Suez Peninsula, which is where everyone believes they crossed over. That would have placed them within the land of Egypt. However they were encountered by Abraham when he was not far from Assyria. So, If you look at the site of Ur and place the Philitines west of Ur then God is directing them to the east of Ur and along the Northern side of the present Persian Gulf. And past the sea of reeds at the entrance to Ur. At one time this was also called "the Red Sea".

18: But God led the people about, through the way of the wilderness of the Red sea: and the children of Israel went up harnessed out of the land of Egypt. (this is a very accurate discription of what the delta of the two rivers were like at the mouth emptying into the Persian Gulf at that time.)

The fact that the ‘Red sea’ was also applied to the Persian Gulf seems to be lost on most Archaeologists. And there is a possibility that these names did not apply to either sea at this time but became their names after the Exodus itself, after these events. And a few reeds at the Suez area do not really constitute a ‘wilderness’. However the area at the mouth of the Euphrates may have constituted a sea of reeds heading towards the Northern side of the present day Persian Gulf. But also containing sand and earth making possible roadways through it at that time.

(Note: at the time of the exodus it is recorded that 'stones of Barad' fell and also "naptha"). In Iran today and the upper part of Arabia there are large deposits of oil, but not much in Egypt. Just as there are area's in the Arabian desert of black stones that cover the ground. Also in their wandering they were always encountering ground fire.This was caused by the Oil or Naptha ignighting.There are no 'stones of Barad' to be found in the area of the Suez Canal.)

2: Speak unto the children of Israel, that they turn and encamp before Pi-hahiroth, between Migdol and the sea, over against Baal-zephon: before it shall ye encamp by the sea.

I am not that familiar with Egyptian names to question ‘Pi-hahiroth or Migdol’, but Baal-zephon at this point in history does not seem appropriate for Egypt. Baal was a God from the area of the Euphrates. From Assyria, and environs. The Egyptians had a far different pantheon of Gods. And Baal was not among them at this date. Or even at a later date. There has never been a shred of evidence that Baal was worshipped in the Nile region.

7: And he (Pharoh)took six hundred chosen chariots, and all the chariots of Egypt, and captains over every one of them.

Most people have a picture of ‘Pharaoh’ and his army jumping on their horses and into their chariots and taking off after them immediately. Hollywood and Egyptologists of the 19th century or earlier are the ones who started that silly idea. This was an enormous party of people. They were not going anywhere very fast. Nor could Pharoh have handled all of those people to take them back. He needed help. Lots of help. And they would have been on horses so they would catch up to them eventually. What he would have done would have been to send out riders to call in all the men of his land to go after them. He could have taken 2 or 3 weeks or even a month to follow. But the main thing is, he would have raised a large army. But the Bible is not very good at giving the passage of times. It is only interested in the telling of events.

If I am right about this setting, then by the time Pharoh’s army caught up to them they would have reached the place opposite to the land that juts out almost to the Northern coast from Bahrain. If there was such a terrible rush of water that destroyed the entire army of Pharoh then it could also have worn away a lot of land with it. So there may not have been the same distance between the two.

It could not have been a small army that took off after Moses. And in those days the rich and powerful adorned their horses and chariots and themselves with gold, silver, jewels in abundance. There would have been thousands of horses and men. They were going to try and bring over a million slaves back home, remember? The discovery of a couple of wheels covered in gold in the Red Sea of Egypt does not come close to this. And I would remind people that when they built the Suez Canal one of the things they did was to dredge the seabed to make sure that no boats, no matter how large would get caught up on reefs, or underwater ledges. Especially did they dredge in the area that is currently claimed for the crossing. They should have brought up all sorts of pieces if it was the crossing. But no one has ever examined the Persian Gulf at that spot. Or even looked for any evidence on the land opposite Arabia.

If he had six hundred of his own chariots and all the chariots of 'Egypt', then he must have had over 3 or 4 thousand at least. But one of the things they keep saying that does not ring true is the remark, "all of Egypt". Please tell me how, "all of Egypt" could have been involved? It stretches for miles along the Nile river up to Aswan. It would have taken months to bring them all together. This is not the land that Moses was in! If they said, "all of the delta" or all of a city, then maybe it would be possible.

21: And Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the LORD caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea dry land, and the waters were divided. 22: And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon the dry ground: and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left.
I have studied the area that they claim was the sea of crossing and there is no way the description fits. It says clearly that he was dividing one sea from another. The land between the Mediteranian and the Red Sea (Suez) is land with marshes and lakes. This is a description of an actual body of water that is divided by magic or natural phenomena. However if the wind is coming from the East then it is coming sideways to this water in the Suez area. Also there would have been nothing really dramatic about this event. And this section is talking about a very real dramatic picture that is unlike anything in nature so far. That means a larger body of water is needed. And an impossible situation. You would certainly get that effect if you parted the Persian gulf at the land bridge! And I suggest you read Emanuel Velakowski’s book, "Worlds in Collision’ for a good description of what happened.


Arrow button



Created © and Maintained by: Nina

Last modified on November 10th,2005


*** Childrens Poetry *** Humour Poetry *** Adult Poetry ***
*** Articles *** Short Stories *** Books *** Cartoons *** Home ***