* Vina Colley, Phone: 740-259-4688 Email:
vcolley@earthlink.net
Vina Colley, President of Portsmouth/Piketon Residents for Environment
Safety and Security (PRESS), is a former electrician at the Portsmouth
Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP) in Piketon Ohio. In the course
of her
employment at the PGDP, she was exposed to a wide array of radioactive
and
hazardous substances which have adversely affected her health.
These
adverse affects include immune system dysfunctional, organic brain
syndrome
secondary to TCE exposure, short-term memory loss, thyroid problems
bronchitis, 50% pulmonary dysfunction, osteoarthritis from fluoride
exposure, Fibromylagia, and calcified gramulomas. She has had
three tumors
removed, one of which was in the back of her head, and undergone a
total
hysterectomy. Before commencing work at the PGDP, Colley, like
her
co-workers, was required to undergo a complete medical examination.
She was
found to have no medical problems nor to require medication.
Currently, she
is unable to go even a day without medication as a result of the multiple
toxicity exposures she received during her employment at the PGDP.
Since the 1988, Colley has been a leading advocate for the sick and
dying
workers at government nuclear sites across the nation, including Portsmouth,
Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Paducah, Kentucky and a key spokesperson for
community
residents and workers seeking a clearer environment, compensation,
and
treatment for medical problems related to the PGDP. PRESS and
the
Yaggdrasil's Uranium Enrichment Project gained national attention in
1999,
making the extent of the government's negligence toward its nuclear
plant
workers public by revealing that undiluted Plutonium, as well as irradiated
fuels, were shipped to the PGDP and handled by PGDP workers without
their
knowledge or consent.
According to Colley, "As a result of our making this issue public,
the
government finally admitted they had withheld crucial information from
the
workers and were negligent in protecting them from these dangerous
materials. They have known for many years that their workers
were being
sickened by toxic exposures and dying as a result of them, but did
not admit
their negligence until they were forced to do so by our public disclosure."
Colley joins a growing number of nuclear workers' advocates nationwide
who
charge the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program
Act
(EEOICPA) passed by Congress in 2000 to compensate these sick and dying
nuclear workers is woefully inadequate because the vast majority of
affected
workers are not covered under the provisions of the bill.
"Our fight for compensation for the sick workers is on-going.
It didn't end
with the passage of the EEOICPA because it has left out most of the
sick
workers," says Colley, "just like bills in the past, such as the Radiation
Exposure Compensation Act (RECA). Under that legislation, many
of the
payments to uranium miners in the western states and those living downwind
of the Nevada above-ground atomic testing sites were delayed or rejected
outright. Many of those sick and dying nuclear workers and locally
affected
citizens were left with nothing; some with nothing more than IOUs from
the
RECA program. By leaving out the majority of sick and dying nuclear
workers
yet again, the current provisions of the EEOICPA continue that same
injustice."
Colley and others are now calling on Congress to address that injustice
by
amending the EEOICPA legislation to include all sick and dying nuclear
workers, as well as those in the community adversely affected by the
government's nuclear plant operations.
Recently, Colley joined fellow sick nuclear worker advocates Harry
Williams,
Glenn Bell, Don Throgmorton, and Gai Oglesbee in forming the National
Nuclear Workers for Justice (NNWJ). On February 26, 2002, the
NNWJ held a
press conference in Washington, DC, giving the Department of Labor,
which is
charged with administering the provisions of the EEOICPA, a "D-" for
their
efforts. PRESS is a member group of Alliance for Nuclear Accountability,
the Military Toxic Project. Other associate groups include Yaggdrasil's
Uranium Enrichment Project, the Beryllium Victims Alliance, and Initiative
for Social Action and Renewal in Eurasia.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
FINAL ADJUDICATION BOARD NOTIFICATION
IN REGARD TO:
THE ENERGY EMPLOYEE OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS
COMPENSATION ACT OF 2000
I, Vina Colley,
do hereby notify the US Department of Labor’s (DOL) subsidiary,
the Final Adjudication
Board (FAB), that I shall not sign any waiver that appears to
be designed
to entice a claimant to forfeit their civil rights. Nor will I be coerced
into believing
that signing such a DOL-FAB waiver is mandated. I believe the
DOL-FAB waiver
that I received with the agency’s dismissal order is a type of
“gag” order
that is not lawful when the next phase of the qualifying process is the
option to file
a lawsuit against the Federal agencies in US Federal District Court. I
am a witness
to the findings of fact the DOL staffers were never qualified to claim
they are expert
adjudicators who Congress allows to suppress American laws and
replace them
with their contrary DOL Interim Regulations. After meeting all
requirements,
I believe the DOL staffers have not performed their duties in the
compassionate,
just, and equitable manner that Congress intended. I believe the
DOL Secretary
of Labor Elaine Chao and her assigned staffers have not complied
with or administered
the EEOICPA regulation as mandated by Congress and the
US President
(reference: “Executive Order” filed with the US Federal Registry,
December 7,
2000, No. 13179). The degradation I have suffered did cause
emotional distress
for my family and I in addition to the denial of my entitlements
which sickened
me. I believe that I have established my prima facie case and that I
more than satisfied
the “50 percent of greater probability” of causation by
preponderance
of the facts presented.
Submitted this_______day of________________in the year 2002.
________________________________________Vina
Colley swears the
foregoing is
true and accurate to the best of my knowledge..
Notarized this_______day of_________________in the year 2002.
_____________________________________________________
Notary signature and seal.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I, claimant Vina Colley sent this original notification
to the DOL Secretary Elaine
Chao and her assigned Final Adjudication Board staffer via the US Postal
Service, certified mail -
return receipt.
Date Location Signature
SERVICE TO:
US Department of Labor Secretary Elaine Chao
Address: 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20211
Telephone:
US Department of Labor Alternate address:
Final Adjudication Board US Department of Labor
% of Assigned Caseworker PO Box 77918
Address: ESA/OWCP/EEOICP Washington, D. C. 20013-7918
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20211
Telephone:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACCOUNTABILITY
IN REGARD TO THE WASHINGTON, D.C.
LOBBYING EVENT
Date: April 16, 2002
Vina Colley )
)
Complainant )
) Affidavit of Vina Colley
vs. )
)
Richard Miller )
)
Defendant )
________________________)
Of concern: Stressful
warnings of harm and defamation of character issued by
activist/lobbyist/
consultant, Richard Miller of Government Accountability Project (GAP)
I, Vina K. Colley do hereby attest to the following:
I, am the President
of an organization, known as Portsmouth/ Piketon Residents for
Environmental
Safety and Security (PRESS). I reside in McDermott, Ohio. My
colleagues delegated
me to represent our interests during a Press Conference scheduled
on February
the 28, 2002 in Washington, D.C. My travel expenses were fully funded by
my representatives.
One of my objectives was to deliver a “D – ” performance rating to
the US Department
of Labor (DOL). In a fair and timely manner, the DOL agency is
mandated by
Congress to administer the “Energy Employees’ Occupational and Illness
Program Act
of 2000 (EEOICPA).” The ACT was supposed to be designed to
compensate dead
or alive atomic weapons’ plant workers or survivors.
During the week
of April 11 through April 16, 2002, I was again delegated to
return to Washington,
D.C. to deliver an “F” performance rating to the DOE during the
advertised “D.C.
Days” event. Recently, the DOE was reprimanded by Congress for not
complying with
their EEOICPA mandates. The newly formed National Nuclear Workers
for Justice
(NNWJ) scheduled another Press Conference to announce the mission
statement and
to present occupationally injured workers’ testimonials.
Because Mr. Miller
instigated stressful situations in the past and present, I must take his
warnings seriously.
I was definitely harmed. At this point in time, I do believe Mr. Miller
has every intention
of harming me, again.
Many occupationally
injured workers from across the Nation decisively came together to
form the NNWJ.
Thousands of occupationally injured atomic weapons’ plant workers
have filed EEOICPA
compensation claims. Our NNWJ members believe the DOL, the
DOE, and the
US Health and Human Services (HHS) have failed to comply with the
EEOICPA regulations
that were overwhelmingly approved by Congress October 31,
2000.
During the week
of April 11 through April 16, 2002, I agreed to act as the delegate who
would: (a) greet
the media; (b) circulate the NNWJ Press Release; and (c) present the
worker/advocates
testimonials, including my own, during the scheduled Press Conference.
During the week
of April 11 through April 16, 2002, I agreed to act as the delegate who
would: (a) greet
the media; (b) circulate the NNWJ Press Release; and (c) present the
worker/advocates
testimonials, including my own, during the scheduled Press
Conference.
While I was performing
my scope of responsibilities, a Government Accountability
Project (GAP)
activist/lobbyist/consultant, Richard Miller, made serious threats to harm
me. I believe
I was being warned because I am committed to carrying out my pledge to
support reformation
of the dysfunctional EEOICPA. In the past, I have been concerned
about Mr. Miller’s
attacks on my character, my mission, my associates, and my
obligations.
The GAP claims to be a non-profit, non-partisan activist group of attorneys
who normally
represent whistleblower clients. Gai Oglesbee, a Hanford occupationally
injured worker
and my associate, told me that Tom Carpenter, the GAP West Coast
Office director
informed her that their organization never intended to become involved
in
the EEOICPA
qualifiers’ issues.
I approached
by Mr. Miller on April 15, 2002, during a pizza party at the Mott House
in
Washington D.C.
The ANA had sponsored the event. PRESS, one of the organizations
that I represent,
is a member of the National ANA organization. When Mr. Miller arrived
at the pizza
party, his main contact person seemed to be Richard (Bob) Alvarez --
another GAP
associate and consultant. Mr. Alvarez was employed by the US
Department of
Energy for many years. I do not agree that Mr. Alvarez supports the
injured workers’.
Rather, I believe he is my adversary working to abolish the intent of
Congress regarding
the provisions of the ACT. Mr. Miller was once an associate member
of the Paper
Allied Industrial Chemical (P.A.C.E ) union. I am aware that Mr. Alvarez
and Mr. Miller
were forced to deal with discrediting problems of their own after each
were involved
in whistleblowing and other related activities that adversely affected
the
DOE agency.
These same individuals claim they were delegated to establish the content
of
the EEOICPA
regulation. I am informed Mr. Miller is a legislative person who works
for/with GAP.
Depending on which GAP source I talk to, Mr. Miller is an advocate or a
consultant.
After 6:00 p.m.
on April 15, 2002, Mr. Miller made very serious threats as he verbally
described his
list of harmful consequences that would result if I continued to lobby
the
concerns of
the sickened workers I was delegated to represent. Participating workers
know the government
delegates have failed to administer the provisions of the EEOICPA
in a fair and
timely manner. Certain regulations that were to be enforced in accordance
with the EEOICPA
aren’t even in-place. Yet, workers’ claims that had merit are already
dismissed by
the non-credentialed DOL caseworkers. About two months ago, after
NNWJ held there
first press conference, Congress contacted the DOE to inform the
agency they
shall comply with their mandates. DOE has still not complied.
Dennis Throgmorton,
an associate, observed first hand how upset and nervous I was
during the scheduled
“D.C. Days” event. Dennis had also traveled to D. C. to represent
our groups during
the Press Conference. I am aware of the bad experience Dennis has
had with GAP.
I feel activist groups like GAP have let us down. This matter of fact hurts
because we should
all be working towards one goal. I have learned that Richard Miller
told certain
of his loyal workers he claims to represent, not to appear at the scheduled
NNWJ Press Conference.
For 15 years discrediting campaigns have been a force to deal
with for my
family and I in the community where we live and work.
Mr. Miller caused
me to believe that he and Mr. Alvarez have already established a plan
of action to
discredit me with the media, Congress, and my representatives. I feel their
personal agendas
caused them to threaten me because they seem to believe my position
and the mission
of the NNWJ somehow stands in the way of their ambitions.
Consequently,
I believe I have cause to document my accountability as follows.
1. April 12,
2002, while I was preparing a Press Release to announce the mission of
the
NNWJ, I asked
a former Oak Ridge nuclear site worker, Janet Michel, to assist me. Ms.
Michel is a
member of the CHE group. At the time, we were located in the ISAR building
in Washington,
D.C. ISAR is an environmental protection group. I questioned why Ms.
Michel insisted
on editing the NNWJ Press Release until it seemed too passive. I learned
that a professional
looking Press Release had already been edited and circulated for
approval by
ISAR. After Ms. Michel said that her version was better, I circulated the
draft copy to
the workers for review. Some of the workers pointed out to me that Ms.
Michel’s Press
Release was “watered-down.” Also, Ms. Michel’s version was error
ridden and incomplete.
For instance, Ms. Michel had deleted the content regarding a very
important citing
of one of the main chemical exposures injured workers’ had already
designate they
wanted to retain in the Press Release -- uranium hexafluoride. This
dangerous carcinogen
is the main chemical used in the process at the gaseous diffusion
plant. A portion
of a worker’s bio and contact was deleted that was important to include.
Ms. Michel was
to speak at the NNWJ Press Conference on Tuesday, April 16, 2002.
2. While I was
on my way back to the main floor of the Kalorama Guest House where I
was staying,
I overheard a telephone conversion between Ms. Michel and Mr. Miller. I
had previously
informed Ms. Michel I would be back after I took care of some personal
business. I’m
not sure if she heard me coming down the stairs. After I overheard her
conversion with
Mr. Miller, I was very upset and actually cried because I had tried to
organize the
event. I heard Ms. Michel informing Mr. Miller that she did not plan to
“show-up for
the Press Conference. The conversation seemed to affirm that a critic,
Jackie Kittrell,
“had told her all about me and how I was ‘pushy.’ ” Ms. Michel said, she
would give Mr.
Miller a call later after she went to her brother’s house. I thought Ms.
Michel traveled
to D.C. to attend the ISAR meeting. I thought Ms. Michel was there to:
(a) help present
the findings of fact regarding how the DOE had put their own nuclear
workers in “harm’s
way.” The government had already admitted liability for their nuclear
facility caretakers’
negligence and abuse that caused death, disease, and suffering by April
2000. (b) I
thought Ms. Michel was there to talk about how the EEOICPA did not
include certain
“Special Exposure Cohorts” and other sickened workers as eligible to
receive aid.
Ms. Michel never told me she was not “showing up.” Clare Gilbert from GAP
told me “Ms.
Michel could not participate in the Press Conference for the NNWJ on
April 16, 2002.”
When Mr. Miller affirmed Ms. Michel was not going to show-up, I was
concerned because
not many workers could afford to travel to D.C. to support the
NNWJ mission
statements. Ms. Michel is also a sickened worker. The CHE group is
chaired by Harry
Williams, another sickened worker. On March 22, 2000, Ms. Michel
testified before
U.S. Senate Government Affairs Committee Hearings on Safety and
Health at DOE's
K-25 and Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plants It seemed strange to me
when Ms. Michel’s
14 page hearing testimony had nothing to do with the Portsmouth site
were I worked.
Sick nuclear
workers agreed to allow a free-lance reporter working for Time’s Magazine
to interview
them. To my knowledge, the article has not been posted after I was informed
of the date(s)
of issuance. I am aware Mr. Miller was asked to interview.
3. I conferred
with Harry Williams (CHE President) and Gai Oglesbee by telephone from
D.C. I informed
them regarding what was going on and to let them know what Ms.
Michel had said,
“I am not showing up for the Press Conference.” Harry asked me, what
was going on?
I told him, “I don’t know; and I would keep checking back with him.” I
feared that
he would get a call from his associates telling him not to come. Fearing
that
Harry would
hear something negative about me and call off his trip to D.C., I told
him not
to believe anything
he heard. But, what I was told to fear would happen, did happen.
Janine Anderson
from Maryville was to accompany Harry to the event. Ms. Anderson
was scheduled
to speak at the Press Conference. I was extremely nervous for fear I
would be the
only delegate in D.C. to present the workers’ testimonials. I contacted
Harry several
more times to make sure I was not going to be the only person available
to
converse with
the media. Many media contacts were very interested in attending the
conference.
During one of the conversations with Harry, he said, “I don’t want to be
caught-up in
the middle of a confrontation between Rich and you.” Harry told me an
unidentified
person informed him that my Congressional representatives “did not like
me.”
I do understand
why Harry didn't want to be in the middle of whatever Mr. Miller was up
to because I
didn't want to be involved, either. On occasion, Mr. Miller has taunted
me
with his statement
“Congress was laughing at me.” Finally, Harry affirmed he would come
to D.C. to,
“See what was going on and to make sure we had someone from his group
scheduled to
speak.” Harry was also concerned that Ms. Michel hadn’t brought any CHE
material to
distribute to the media that disclosed the workers’ concerns. I reminded
Harry
to make sure
he brought his material with him that he intended to distribute to the
media.
4. On April 15,
2002, when Mr. Miller showed-up at the Mott House, he agreed to talk
to me. I asked
him, "What was going on -- why was he trying so hard to "stop" what the
NNWJ advocates
were trying to accomplish.” I asked him why he believed he has the
right to tell
the workers he advocates for and his associates I had no credibility with
my
Congresspersons.
I also asked Mr. Miller, why the CHE advocates were sent to DC
under the guise
they represent all sickened workers. I believe the vast majority of the
workers were
not informed. Mr. Miller responded by saying, “the Oak Ridge
Congresspersons
were opposing the ACT. Mr. Miller once told me my Congresspersons
favored compensating
qualified workers”. At the pizza party during my confrontation with
Mr. Miller,
I said, “Richard, we should be on the same side. Why are you so angry with
me? Why are
you trying to exclude me? Is it because I do not want people involved who
lied to us about
our exposures who are still in charge? I ask him why I was left out of
the
process to formulate
the ACT? To the best of my knowledge, the effected workers were
never informed
the scheduled events that was in their best interests to attend..
Mr. Miller clearly
said, “WE were wondering how you got around them to contact the
media. That
would be taken care of and your credibility will be damaged.” I took “WE”
to mean his
the GAP “family of associates.” Mr. Miller began to walk away from me
when I said,
“If you say anything else that damages my credibility or I am harmed, I
will
sue you.”
5. I was informed
that Tom Carpenter (GAP West Coast Director) and Richard Miller
planned to meet
with members of CHE on April 16th after the Press Conference. I was
not invited
even though I consider CHE to be an associate group. No media
representatives
showed up just like Mr. Miller had threatened. Later that night during
the
ANA awards dinner,
Mr. Alvarez and Mr. Miller came together again. Mrs. Kitty
Tucker-Alvarez
made eye contact with me and a cold, forced smile was directed towards
me. I felt her
demeanor was meant to be a warning.
6. Earlier that
week while visiting with Beverly Cook of DOE, her subordinate said, “She
was coming to
Richard Miller’s D.C. Press Conference.” The subordinate must have
known something
was wrong by the way I looked at her. I was puzzled by her statement.
Suddenly, I
realized the subordinate may have thought that because many presenters
that
were to speak
at the NNWJ Press Conference, like Janet Michel from CHE and others,
were part of
the group the DOE kept referencing as “the Richard Miller group.” I thought
to myself I
have seen this kind of intervention during the human experimentation hearings.
Some victims
were invited to attend important meetings while others were excluded. I
was
made aware that
GAP associates and Richard Miller did meet with certain workers that
were to attend
the Press Conference. I was excluded.
I note that Congress
overwhelming voted to approve the ACT October 31, 2000, which
was signed by
President Clinton. Mr. Miller said, he was told that our workers never
called our Congresspersons.
That statement seemed odd to me because I know our
workers have
continuously complained in the past and are still complaining to this day.
Our workers
went to D.C. in 1979 to inform Senator John Glenn of the health and safety
issues. They
media reported “the workers stormed Senator Glenn’s office.” We worked
very closely
with our Congresspersons to disclose the toxic conditions that existed
at our
plants. In the
1980s on many occasions, I lobbied in D.C. to try to convince our
Congressional
leaders to investigate the unsafe and unhealthy conditions that were “killing”
our workers.
I gathered as many names of former workers that actually received payment
for their radiation
exposure injuries back in the 40s. I discovered the amount of money
these workers
were paid. I was the one who informed Richard Miller of this discovery.
At
that period
of time, the union was not supporting the sick workers; and I was trying
to
convince the
workers to disclose the truth. With the help of Mary B. Davis, we were
able
to get the story
out about plutonium (PU) being shipped to the Portsmouth, Ohio site just
like the Kentucky
site. Hearings were held in 1999 regarding the PU in the gaseous
diffusion plants.
OUR government knew, but withheld the information from us. We were
not informed;
so, we could not protect ourselves. The government agents promised to
take care of
us and have yet to keep that promise. I observed my Congressmen with tears
in there eyes
as they looked around the hearing room full of sick and dying workers as
each gave their
testimonies. I truly believe that our Congresspersons thought the
EEOICPA regulation
would take care of all qualified workers. But, the ACT has
excluded thousands
of sickened, dying, and dead workers for many reasons imagined by
uninformed DOL
– DOE caseworkers . My groups believe that the DOE governs who
will and who
will not receive the EEOICPA provisions. I am aware certain workers have
been already
been awarded payment for their exposure to toxins such as FLUORIDES.
Others who worked
right beside , like me, have been denied benefits – a discriminatory
finding. Site
workers are wondering why we are not being informed about what goes on
behind closed
door hearings that allows GAP advocates/consultants like Mr. Miller and
Mr. Alvarez
to participate, but not the occupationally injured “veterans” the President
said, “are courageous.”
I informed Mr.
Miller, I had already warned many advocates and the workers that they
had been left
out of the hearings when the 1990 RECA and the Marshal Island regulations
were structured.
I believe the EEOICPA is a copy-cat version of those regulations. I
identify the
same people that appeared during the human experimentation hearings held
in
Ohio and D.C.
I find this discovery alarming.
The stress that
was caused by these harrowing events caused me to remember these same
GAP employees
did try to discredit me in my own community; with my family and friends;
and with my
union.
Like many other
occupationally injured workers across the Nation, I am sickened by my
chronic exposure
to radiation and chemicals. On a daily basis, I struggle with related
disease. I worry
about the diagnosis of pre-cancerous conditions. I feel my physicians
have taken every
precaution they can to prolong my life. My immune system is
dysfunctional
which causes severe fatigue and my body is susceptible to infections.
I have asked
the questions many times – what is going on and why the cover ups? Why
has the DOE
withheld information from the workers as I know this stance violates many
protection laws
and, now, the EEOICPA regulation. The DOE publicly admitted
workers’ personnel
and exposure incident records are destroyed; were never
documented;
are lost; old computer data banks are not compatible with the new data
banks which
causes file access to be denied?
Yes, I am aware
National media coverage has not been published that was scheduled to
be released
to the best of my knowledge. Such as, the Time’s Magazine article that
was
prepared by
a freelance reporter after he interviewed sickened workers and Richard
Miller. The
article was to be released sometime before, during, or after the April
16,
2002, D. C.
venture.
I have pledged my commitment to support the sick and dying.
National media
coverage has been difficult to find. I have always felt that Mr. Alvarez
(a
former or existing
DOE employee) was the one who has suppressed the news regarding
the violations
of safety and health regulations at the Portsmouth site. While Mr. Alvarez
was “officially”
working for DOE, I have always believed the workers were left out of the
compensation
process. Russia’s highly enriched uranium has been shipped to Portsmouth
for down blinding.
More is on the way. I was amazed to find out Ms. Michel's husband is
working on the
highly enriched uranium shipment that many workers believe terminated
their jobs.
I question why information is withheld at the Portsmouth site. How could
Ms.
Michel testify
about Portsmouth concerns when she knows nothing about the findings.
Portsmouth workers
had the highest exposure of all the gaseous diffusion plants according
to a GAO 1985
report. Portsmouth made bomb grade material 97% high assay from
1954 1991.
I do not fully
understand why I pose a threat to Mr. Miller, Mr. Alvarez, Mrs. Alvarez,
and other GAP
“family of associates.” I have been victimized for years. I did not realize
that the D.C.
trips would cause so much uncertainty and harm. How have I been able to
stay alive when
I am so upset and nervous whenever I am confronted by such evil people
with such evil
ways.
I am considering filing an “Intent to File Suit” and in requesting a restraint order.
Submitted this_____day of April in the year 2002.
______________________________________Vina
Colley swears under penalty of
perjury the
foregoing is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Notarized this______day of April in the year 2002.
_________________________________________
Notary signature and seal.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I, Vina K. Colley, sent this original affidavit
to Richard Miller and a copy to Tom
Carpenter of the Government Accountability Project via the US Postal
Service, certified mail - return
receipt.
Date Location Signature
SERVICE TO:
Richard Miller
Government Accountability Project
Title: Advocate/Consultant (Legislative Committee)
Address:
Telephone: ???-???-????
Tom Carpenter
Government Accountability Project
Title: West Coast Director
Address: 1402 3rd Avenue; Seattle, Washington 98101
Telephone: 206-292-2850