Hi,
today it seems to me I finally arrived to understand Reiki in a simple way.
If we strip the thing from the surrounding ideology and explanation with "universal life energy" and symbols on chakras etc. what remains? The phenomenon in itself is a light touch, or barely touch over the skin of the patient. Now, the importance of touch to the skin for the general psychosomatic well-being is a well-known fact. Most important is it for infants for their development, but our skin is "hungry" for touch in all our life. Read this article entitled “The Sense of Touch" from Emily Grantner of Michigan State University in this regard (http://whalonlab.msu.edu/Student_Webpages/Babies/The%20Sense%20of%20Touch.htm )
In our Western society we starve our skins because of cultural barriers for various reasons (mainly for sexual overtones) to touch each other. By introducing it as Reiki, healing touch accompanied by the "fairy tale" about mysterious energy we make it acceptable to touch somebody at it will of course be helpful as it responds to the need of being touched and not sufficiently.
I think that physicians and other health care workers, counselors, spiritual guides need to include in their service the benefits of touching the persons they intend to help (patient/client/directee etc) in a reassuring way. As well as in family where we should be free to hug and touch and rub each other - it does good!
If we see with this "phenomenological" eye at Reiki, we can be free from the suspicious quasi-religious ideology tied to it, and it becomes simply a good "healing" touch. With the same perspective we can free reflexology from the esoteric baggage and enjoy a good foot massage that will be surely relaxing and refreshing for our whole tired body and psyche.
--Kris