Fuel mileage[V70][2000] Mike Madsen -- Tuesday, 5 June 2001, at 11:23 p.m.
I purchased my 2000 V70 AWD R wagon in January 2001. Everything
about the car is great except the
fuel mileage. What are other people getting for MPG with R models
or reg AWD models. Any tips for
better economy?
Re: Fuel mileage[V70][2000]
Sin -- Wednesday, 6 June 2001, at 12:37 a.m.
Tips for better mileage: - Increase
tire pressure.
- Run synthetic
engine oil and synthetic ATF.
- Remove any
heavy unecessary items from the car.
- Remove any
unecessary exterior items such as wind deflectors and roof racks.
- Have some
one fabricate some steel panels or aluminum panels for the under body of
the car.
- Any exhaust
modification, whether a cat-back or a downpipe
back exhaust, should increase your
- Choose more
efficient tires.
- Get a higher
flowing air filter.
- Make sure
your engine is running as efficiently as possible.
Basically, everything I've mentioned is
common sense. You may not want to go for some of the more
|
Re: Fuel mileage[V70][2000] Bill -- Wednesday, 6 June 2001, at 8:04 a.m.
Mike, Sin said it perfectly....However if
I can make a couple of suggestions. I don't know what you cruise at
on the highway, but if its 75,your going
to eat up the gas....If you want better milage you've got to go
slower....which is real hard for a lot
of people and their Volvos to do!!! So decrease you highway speed by
5-7 mph and you WILL get better mpg! Plus
try to use a "VERY LITE FOOT" Good luck, Bill, getting 35-39
highway mpg on my S40 abiet fanatical economy
driving!!!!
--
bill
On my V70 GLT I'm getting 20 to 21 MPG (mostly suburban driving)
With my standard 1999 V70, I'm getting a little over 25 in town and nearly 30 miles per gallon on the road.
Thanks for the great tips, Sin.
I can't imagine how I forgot to mention driving style.
I guess I don't consider them much myself. Heck, I
usually cruise at 160km/h if the conditions are good enough.
BTW, anyone have a quick way of converting
mpg to L/100km?
--
> BTW, anyone have a quick way of converting mpg to L/100km
not on me but if you wanna wait till tomorrow I can get it for you.
Great tips Sin, I'm thinking I'm going to try the synthetic ATF
next time I flush (probably next month) and see
what happens
--
1998 S70, heavy mods
If you increase the diameter of your tires, that would have the
effect of reducing the number of turns of your
wheels per actual measured mile, thus making any calculation
of MPG from your cars odometer falsely
low.
The rest of your comments are well taken.
Yes, but you will actually be increasing mileage.
--
Mike,
I'm getting around 26 MPG in my 98 V70 AWD with a chip and dual
cat-back exhaust. If I take a long trip
(Sandy Eggo to Palm Springs) the mileage jumps to nearly 30.
I have an automatic xmission.
About 40,000 miles ago, I added the chip and exhaust. Before that,
the mileage was around 23-24, and
around 27-28 on the PS trip.
I drive approximately 75 MPH when traffic and safety permits,
but have at least one stop/go set of traffic
to/from work slowing me to 30-50 MPH. One thing I find myself
doing is using the shifter to slow down in
traffic when I am going less than 50 MPH. Saves on brake wear,
but don't know the long-term effects on
the xmission.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Mike Harris in Sandy Eggo
--
I am about to order a new V70. The salesman is trying to convince
me the factory installed front to back
racks don't affect mileage "much" or make much wind noise. "Its
the side to side bars that effect these
issues." What is the truth?
(96 850 still going strong, but couldn't pass up military overseas
rate. Eligibility dues kinda stiff though)
--
Sam 96 850 Turbo Wagon
I'm sure the roof racks you described aren't going to make that
much wind noise or increase mileage that
much either. But if you really care, and don't really use them,
then don't get them.
The truth is, almost anything you add to the exterior of the car
no matter how aerodynamic or small in
frontal area is still going to create some wind noise and increase
wind resistance.
--
If I'm understanding your post correctly, the "front-to-back"
roof rails are those along the length of the car,
one rail on each side. The amount of aerodynamic drag that these
would add to the car is probably
negligible. The frontal area of each of those rails is probably
less than two square inches. You might think
of it as the drag imposed by you sticking your thumbs out into
the slipstream when the car is moving.
On the other hand, no pun intended, "cross bars" are those that
go across the car, from one side to the
other. Now the drag would be significantly more. Imagine holding
an inch-and-a-half closet pole (four feet
long) across the car, out of the sunroof and in the slipstream.
The frontal area of that pole is going to be
around 72 square inches, and usually there are two of them on
a car. These are also known as "load bars"
because bicycle and ski fixtures attach to them. Fortunately,
V-70's come with prepared holes above each
door made to accommodate removable roof racks. I chose that style
so as to not have anything on the roof
when it's not in use. Good luck!
--
B. De Denko
I just completed a 750 mile road trip in my 98 v70 t-5 auto. Los
Angeles to Mammoth, CA up 395, mostly
freeway with speeds ranging from 60 mph to 120 mph (very briefly),
with lots of mountain driving. Average
fuel mileage over trip was 25.1 mpg. I would imagine you could
get around 30 mpg on cruise control @
60-65 mph.
If you have any experiences, facts, hints comments or data that you think might be useful on the site, please
and I will post it, with an acknowledgement of your contribution (if you so wish).