ECCLESIASTES 2:8 = I also gathered for myself.....many concubines: man's delight.

PSALM 37:4 = Take delight in the LORD, and He will give you the desires of your heart.

MATTHEW 6:33 = But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things shall be yours as well.

MATTHEW 7:7 = Ask, and it shall be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it shall be opened to you.

EPHESIANS 5:3 = But fornication or all impurity and covetousness must not even be named among you, as is fitting among saints.

I TIMOTHY 4:4 = For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected, if it is received with thanksgiving.

I TIMOTHY 5:14 = I therefore want younger women to marry, bear children, manage their household, and give the adversary no cause to revile us.

HEBREWS 11:6 = Without faith it is impossible to please God, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that He exists and that He rewards those who seek Him.

Ask for sex, and - by God - you will get it.

The Lord is not a sadistic tyrant, and He knows how to get people together for the most imaginative, satisfying, and fulfilling sexual actions and connections humanly possible.

But, as we have records of human endeavors and accomplishments in the past, particularly in the Biblical accounts, our efforts are combined with God's assistance to actually result in the expected phenomena occurring. When Israel did the fighting to preserve themselves, God not only had ordered them to do so beforehand, but accomodated them in the process of they themselves conquering not simply their enemies but also God's enemies. For those who please Him, God indeed helps those who help themselves.....but sooner or later thwarts those who do not please Him, no matter how hard they try on their own (if contrary to Him and His will revealed in His Word: The HOLY BIBLE).

As with shopping for and then perhaps purchasing commercial merchandise, there are rules of engagement to approach an opposite-gender human being for sexual connections of sundry types.

First off, and unless one is a demonically-insane pervert or pervertess (see Luke 8:27-35) [luridly] exhibiting themselves [lasciviously] within a nudist park, camp, cruise ship, resort, dance-bar, or nude-beach area, one must have clothes on to not be arrested and escorted away for indecent exposure, and cellphone calls to 911 are but a few moments in the making. [Years ago, amishly-dressed/large-family pioneers of the Old West carried sidearm pistols and revolvers; nowadays, the sidearms are quick cellphone calls for nearly-on-the-spot police presence]. Clothes are not necessarily a factor in the private acquisition and private lustful and/or sensual appreciation of galleries and harems of perhaps-available-to-all covertly-saved-and-viewed .jpg photos or .mpg movies of naked virtual concubines or harlots captured or surfed to on the personal digicam, hard drive, removable media of diskettes or CDs or jump drives, and/or internet.

Interestingly enough, in encountering live, life-sized, three-dimensional, in-person people (not merely the perhaps-licentously-pornographic possibly-idolatrous graven images portrayed on-screen within cyberspace chat rooms), we are not talking about merely any wardrobe combination possible.

A barefooted or bikini-clad (1) girl (2) standing (3) on the right side of the road (4) facing oncoming traffic (5) with her hitchhiking thumb stuck out would of course get a number of offers for a ride, but by her scanty attire would infer to the whoevers who gave her rides that she might be inviting her driver(s) (whoever that or they may be, and would be in the future if she most likely did hitchhiking again) to not only allude to and inquire why she was so misclad, but also erotically retaliate against her if her response indicated the possibility of voluntarily or involuntary committing some types and degrees of immorality at the diverse location of either one's choice.

For most men, whether they admit it or not, even partially-immodest PUBLIC attire (of loose-long-haired mopheadedness, naked-armed sleeveslessness, nude-legs-slackslessness, and/or barefooted sockslessness in sandals) on a woman is a danger sign and even turnoff, resulting in disregarding her against becoming a trusted, worthy, and faithful sexual partner with him. Terroristic at-random public semi-immodesty of a frequently-anonymous woman (the foundational basis of concocting, inciting to search for, and commercially or non-commercially disseminating more severe porn) is irritating, anti-social, and obnoxiously-dirty body-object lewdness-in-the-gutter sexual harassment which has forget-intimacy-with-her consequences.

As with silently surveying merchandise in a store, car lot, and garage sale, whatever looks damaged, or like it might not work, or is too high-priced will no longer be considered for purchase. Words need not even be said in such cases.

Men subtly see other wordless signs of whether or not a woman is available for sexual solicitation. If the gal has a diamond-like or gold ring on the 4th or even 3rd finger of her left hand, most assume (not presume) that she is already engaged or married to someone else, and Christian men immediately then disqualify her against further sexual-relationship consideration with them personally.

The absence of rings on the previously-mentioned fingers cannot reveal whether or not she even wants a heterosexual relationship with a particular man who might solicit her for sex. There are both not-seeking-marriage nuns and homo-lesbians out there. Bumper signs on vehicles can tell a lot about the drivers, as do her accompanying bodyguards and friend(s) of either gender.

Where a woman would locate her solitary body could be significant as to making herself available for sexual solicitation. The second chapter of the Old-Testament book of Ruth gives good advice on where a woman should be and should not be to get the sexual solicitation she wants (if she wants such solicitation), plus avoid the sexual solicitation and molestation she does not want. Even though most first encounters with a future sexual partner occur when she is part of a close-promimity herd around her, it is generally nonfeasible to ask a particular woman for sex if she is tightly within a close group of people around her, or if she is in a crowded and/or busy public place not conducive to individual sexual solicitation.

Repeated encounters with a particular woman on a more-or-less daily or at least weekly basis are usually necessary for a man to rather closely observe and evaluate a woman over time pertaining to a number of vital factors before he decides to either ask her for sex or divert his attention to some other person. If he finally decides to speak to her either verbally or in writing, the initial request typically consists of suggestion involving a theater movie or attendance with him to some other public event of a music or sports nature, followed by a lunch, supper, or snacktime invitation. If complied with, then after such a test date, (or - more often than not - after a few such test dates with her), the man might ask her to enter a library study room, conference room, restaurant, etc. (review Hebrews 13:4) to suggest that they both fill out and give to each other Mate Selection Evaluation Forms before contacting each other again, but then within a lockable unisex family-room lavatory, motel room, or either one's cabin/apartment/condo/townhouse/home after analyzing the answers on those forms. If they both agree to continue the relationship, an (at least) cubic-zirconium ring and (at most) gold marriage band given to the woman by the man in the lockable unisex family-room lavatory, motel room, or either one's cabin/apartment/condo/townhouse/home along with mutual completion of Common-Law Mate Certificates with or without planning for a future wedding ceremony officiated by a judge or pastor, (which clergyman has not previously demanded marriage-discouraging-or-postponing "premarital counseling" interrogation sessions).

Clearly, legitimate and honorable sexual solicitation by a man to and with a woman for necking, petting, under-clothes and then without-clothes foreplay leading to fellatio and coitus in various positions.....is not indiscriminate, without proper and adequate identification, careful mutual and time-tested premarital evaluation by both, plus deliberately consentual agreement by man and woman together.