PORN-CAUSE STOP

Should Online Internet Porn Be Outlawed?

Intrinsic to every contemplation and discussion about prohibiting porn is [adequate] definition of WHAT pornography exactly is.

God (according to His will and intentions as revealed in Christ's 66-book HOLY BIBLE), genuine Christians (enlightening everyone they can according to their limited understanding, partial acceptance, and interpretation/misinterpretation of various translations and mis-translations of the Lord's HOLY BIBLE comprised of ben-Asher Masoretic Hebrew-Text Old Testament and Scrivener-Trinitarian Greek-Text New Testament), plus non-Christians and anti-Christians (with their heretical weird superstitions, misapplications, misquotings, illegitimate revisions, and twisted presumptions).....all have different views as to what is - shall we say - secondary pornography compared to primary pornography.

Medically and physiologically speaking, primary CONTACT pornography consists of mouth-or-rectal-or-genital-insertion physical connections of totally or partially NUDE human bodies involving what bra and/or panties [or underpants for males] usually cover.

NON-CONTACT primary porn consists of single or group human bodies exposing - again - what bra and/or panties [or underpants for males] usually cover.

Most entities (be they religious or non-religious) generally agree on this. Hence, cops arrest and punish streakers and flashers who do not confine their general-public nudity to nudist parks and camps.

Secondary porn (a.k.a. less severe licentuousness and impurity) is more open to subjective argument and individual preferences, prejudices, and preconceptions in a situational-ethics context. To those of religious-fundamentalist mentality:

LOOSE long hair unbound and longer than mouth-level
bared SHOULDER(S)
SLEEVESLESSNESS
bared MIDRIFFS
bared BACKS
bared BELLIES
bared NAVELS
bared THIGH(S)
any parts of bared BUTTOCK(S)
bared LEGS
bared FOOT or FEET


in mixed-gender general-public view, are secondary pornography.

Once 'porn' has been thus defined and concurred with by those in charge, how to censor, restrict, prohibit, stifle, thwart, filter, and eradicate such is the next step.

Notice that ALL definitions of porn above (BOTH primary and secondary) are comprised of:

INDECENT-exposure IMMODESTY!


At this point, we should consider the ORIGIN of and even INCITEMENT to both concoct and display various types and degrees of pictoral pornography in print or on screen, and THE obvious answer is:

PEOPLE THEMSELVES


who slink or parade themselves around indecently and immodestly in the POTENTIAL or KINETIC view of those who do not solicit nor desire such inflicted attack.

One of the fringe benefits of Bush Jr. and his Coalition invading plus vandalizing Afghanistan and Iraq near the beginning of the 21st century (also remember Reagan and the Iranian hostages) was that summertime-immodest american women (in particular) were continually reminded visually by the network media of the nun-and-amish-like modestly-shawled-and-robed Moslem women of Afghanistan and Iraq.....in stark and embarrassing contrast to the lewd summertime MIS-dress of american/european sleeveslessness, slackslessness, and sockslessness either pseudo-angelically or arrogantly flaunted by TERRORISTIC imposers of NON-asked-for sexual harassment. [Unfortunately, however, the U.S. military also forced that summertime-immodest american culture on fundamentalist islamic in Afghanistan and Iraq]....all in SPITE of 'intolerance'-accusatory bastards and bitches exposing themselves as judge-not-lest-you-be-judged HYPOCRITES who themselves were INTOLERANT against righteous fundamentalist modesty and decency!

It is rather absurd to attempt to outlaw more-or-less SEQUESTERED, CONTROLLABLE and PREDICTABLE retaliatory and substitutionary-relief internet porn sites without first illegalizing the massive-infestation exhibitionism of FULL-sized, 3D, LIVE-motion, SUDDENTLY-appearing women (NOT 'ladies') roaming around anonymously and terroristically inciting lust, irritation, confusion, and needless dangerous loveless antagonism - with illogical follow-up prudishness and deprivational abstinence at their irrational whims.

Once authentic and consistent modesty is realized, cooperated with, accomodated to, and officially accomplished by law-enforced courts- approved authority and action within neighborhoods, communities, stores, businesses, schools, and churches, what is posted and resides on the national internet will assuredly and invaribly reflect that same modesty on screen devoid of the now-devastating problem of having myriad PSEUDO-'legal' stumbling blocks of lasciviously-lurid body-parts competition imposed against public health and wellbeing.

That is preferable to both live-person ladies and secluded private internet surfers non-anonymously having their Social Security numbers branded upon their foreheads or hands as possible public-nuisance disturbers-of- the-peace.

MANY sexually-related consequences of immodesty (e.g. abortion homicide, kidnapping and abusing children, spouse-beatings, car and pedestrians accidents, assembly-line foul-ups, suicides, murders, rape assaults, etc.) will be significantly lessened as society in general complies with the divine implications of KJV's, RSV's, NASV's, NKJV's

Genesis 3:21
Numbers 5:18 in immediate context
II Samuel 13:18 (RSV and NASV only)
Proverbs 5:19 (KJV and NASV) in immediate context
Song of Solomon 7:1-5 (RSV and NASV)
Isaiah 3:17 (not NASV)
Isaiah 20:4
Isaiah 47:1-4
Jeremiah 2:25 in immediate context
Ezekiel 16 and 23
Hosea 2
I Corinthians 11:1-16 (KJV and NKJV)
I Corinthians 12:23 (various versions)
I Timothy 2:8-9 (various versions)


Even commerce will be revitalized by such pro-modesty correction and adjustment - causing mainline search-engine news-page portals to actually REFUSE posting and hosting immodest popup ads of women indecently misdressed as previously described (as for example in sleevesless/slacksless/socksless bathing suits or bikinis) on their home webpages....PLUS more appropriately and succinctly warn surfers about venturing into possible-nudity cyberspace.

The old adage of If one looks for evil long and hard enough, one will find it always will apply in this present non-theocratic world of immoral-majority-on-the-broad-and-easy-road-to-destruction pollution and wicked choices. But - remembering the legacies of our great-great-great- grandparents or those before them and their everyday/commonplace exquisitely puritannical/victorian modesty - the sacred goal is to make finding evil and getting defiled by it more and more difficult.

It MUST be so - if Revelation 14 is to be fulfilled, which predicts that 144,000 Israelite-tribe virgins who have not defiled themselves with women will become a reality.