When Matthew chapter one states that Joseph was an honorable man, thus not putting his virgin Mary to shame publicly for her being premaritally pregnant, it should NOT be PRESUMED that Joseph was not willing to publicly expose (and perhaps even participate in - having Roman law approval? - stoning to death) impenitent immoral harlots diagnosed with nonaborted children.

Even more than in the case of Judah with Tamar (recorded in Genesis 38) in which semi-righteous Judah initially ordered his newly-pregnant, semi-righteous, daughter-in-law Tamar to be burned...until he discovered that he himself had been her impregnator....Joseph realized that pure and holy Mary was NOT the type to fool around sexually.

The driving forces of both men mentioned above was EROTIC DESIRE and a GOOD SENSE OF SACRED JUSTICE. As with Samson getting intimate with Philistine women to seek an occasion against the LORD's Philistine enemies - and polygamous David taking Nabal's benevolent widow Abigail amongst his other wives, certain porn webmasters [displaying a certain type of porn] may be in part motivated by both sensuality and righteousness....righteousness as an expression of and retaliation against PERVERT women and men who see nothing wrong with women MIS-attired publicly in semi-immodest mopheadedness, bare-armed sleevelessness, shorts or shortened-skirts-bared legs, toes exposed with sockless sandals, etc.....in PUBLIC shopping centers, stores, shops, government offices, post offices, churches, football fields and basketball stadiums, for the Olympics, tourist attractions, parks, beaches, etc.

WHY the straddling of fences among the LUKEWARM....who PRESUME that they are "normal" and "legally justified?" Why not EITHER be COMPLETELY and CONSISTENTLY dressed MODESTLY (First Timothy 2:8-15) during warm summer days in GENERAL public view, like old-time pilgrim-pioneer puritans....or INSTEAD go TOTALLY naked as if everyone was obligated by God knows what or who to conform to the satanic seasonal style and fashion of parading themselves around as in one big nudist colony, park, or camp?

"Because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of My mouth" declares Jesus in Revelation. "You CANNOT serve two [contradictory-to-each-other] masters." To be half-modest is [in one sense] as EVIL as being half-immodest. Whether the glass is optimistically half full or pessimistically half empty, the drinker will not get a FULL glass - either way no matter how described or misdescribed.

So SOME pornsites [intentionally CONTROLLING and LIMITING the SELECTIVE type of porn] are a [in one sense] righteous retaliation against the defiling immodest of the world (and especially church) for the edification of the moral minority -- a hearty, wholesome, messy, dirty, and not-so-sick exposee of and against "compromising" women and the suckup male wolf-whistling "it-doesn't-bother-me" patsies agreeing with and protecting them......in the bizarre but acceptable format of Isaiah 3 and 20 and 47, Ezekiel 16 and 23, plus Jeremiah 2 and Hosea 1-2.

The PSEUDO-"legal" NON-lawful exhibitionists who flaunt their semi-nude foolishness [sexually harassing men who neither ask for nor want such vile immodest filth and indecent depravity imposed against them and shoved in their non-soliciting faces] have and continue to [ignorantly and carelessly, or with pompous-ass, feminist-twit, egocentric arrogance] terroristically assault their victims...many times ANONYMOUSLY and for FREE.

Therein lies the problem of charging money in the commercialization of porn in whatever media - as with lurid host of those who have done and yet do commercialize such.

To make a financially profitable business out of licentuously passing on to others the lascivious lewdity of misdressed or nondressed women who have needlesssly, greedily, and senselessly exposed themselves as porn models causes the commercial pornographer to lose the understandable motive of righteously retaliating with the intention of finally eradicating BOTH LIVE, FULL-sized person plus ALL OTHER types of porn and semi-porn display....and instead establishes a porn-perpetuating means of occupational amd financial sustinence to pay recurring bills with, along with short-circuiting the healthy and respectable drive to get married to have truly-satisfying heterosexual fulfilment.

***************************************************************************************************

Over many many months - even years - and ESPECIALLY at the present time (to this webauthor's experiencial knowledge), it is a serious waste of time for pornsurfers to search for [legally]-copyable "quality" porn on the internet (with "quality" porn being enlargeable-thumbnail true-color photos of birthday-suit -naked attractive-enough young women with feet and especially soles of bare feet in view.)

Porn-website URL listings brought up after typing in porn-oriented keywords into the search boxes of Google, Yahoo, Lycos and much more consist either of mostly mosaic-homepage conglomerations of not-worth-copying homepage pics leading only to credit-card-pay-request webpages....or merely hotlink to other not-worth-copying mosaic-.html porn webpages.

With persistence, increasingly-frustrated pornsurfers relentlessly searching for free 'quality' porn pix will eventually (through popups) get a plethoria of more pop-ups -- a VERY meager number of which will lead to "promising" category-listing webpages of galleries of enlargeable-thumbnail photos of sometimes-attractive individual gals.

Alas, clicking on 50%-80% of those are, again, merely hotlinks to OTHER porn websites, many of which consist of [disgusting and non-erotic lesbianism, bestiality, bondage spanking or dungeon torture, multiple-men-on-one-woman threesomes, and other obnoxious impositions.

The remaining 20%-50% do contain links to thumbnail-enlargeable color photos of generally-attractive individual gals.

BUT only about 20% of those bring up 100% completely-barefoot/naked women!

And only about 10% of THOSE do not have copyright-equivalent trademark or pornwebsite-referral markings somewhere on the photos themselves!

Added to THAT is the EXASPERATION of the occasional encounter with clicking into a website which will not go away but instead locks itself into the browser to keep re-appearing no matter what one does to try to get rid of it (though sometime pressing Ctrl-Alt-Delect simultaneously helps overcome that). Sometimes what one clicks into is a flurry of endlessly-repeating webpage-obscuring pop-ups that also won't go away,

screen freezers causing webpage lockups out of which it is impossible to extricate onesself and move into something else,

larger-than-monitor-screen-sized pop-ups (eclipsing upper-right-hand x's and upper toolbar options, so one cannot click out of them:.....

all of which finally necessitate shutting down the computer and re-starting it -- taking up that much more wasted time!!!