Chomsky, N.
1999. The New Military Humanism - Lessons From Kosovo.
Pluto Press, London, UK.
Rating: JJJJ
About the
Author: Noam Chomsky is not only a political
analyst, but also a well-known linguist. he is Institute Professor
in the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology .
Books by
the same author: Profit
over People; The Common Good; The Fateful Triangle; Acts of Aggression
(with Ramsey Clark and Edward Said); 9-11, Manufacturing Consent;
Rogue States; Deterring Democracy; Powers and Prospects; World
Orders, Old and New;Year 501: The Conquest Continues;
|
Review
Among
those writers who attempt to deconstruct Western propaganda, Noam
Chomsky is the most persuasive. In The New Military Humanism,
he provides a new understanding of the NATO war in Yugoslavia.
He accuses NATO of being responsible for the very same disaster
it claimed to be trying to prevent: the mass exodus of the Kosovar
population. He also criticises the western blindness when it came
to the horrendous violence and subsequent exile of the Krajina
Serbs by Franjo Tudjman's Croatian forces, which was "the
most extreme single case of ethnic cleansing in the horrendous
wars of secessionin Yugoslavia, but one that has not yet called
for indictements". He then moves on to Kosovo, where
he attempts to show how much more complex the problems there were,
far more complex than portrayed by the Western media. For example,
he reminds us that between 1966 and 1989, approximately 130,000
Serbs were forced to leave the province due to Kosovar Albanian
harrassment. He also reminds us that the Kosovo Liberation Army
was essentially a terrorist organisation. Chomsky wrote before
the events of the 11th of September 2001, but in the light of George Bush's subsequent
"war against terror" in Afghanistan, the brutal Serbian
retaliation in Kosovo was mild in comparison. However, Chomsky
does draw comparisons between NATO deafness to the cries of the
Kurds, being heavily oppressed inside NATO member Turkey, with
the hysteria concerning Kosovo. Worse, he convincingly argues
that the NATO intervention in Kosovo, if anything, made things
worse. In other words, "NATO had to bomb to prevent the
ethnic cleansing that was 'the result' of its bombing, as anticipated".
He cites clear evidence that NATO generals evidently knew about
the results their bombing campaign would have, and cheerfully
ignored the consequences. Chomsky then deconstructs the myth
that the bombing heralded a new era of military humanism, of "humanitarian
bombing" at the service of human rights. Deliberate bombing
of civilian targets in Serbia clearly provide proof of the contrary.
He also brings to our attention a very important clause of the
Rambouillet Peace talks, which Serbia was accused of undermining.
No wonder the Serbs refused the treaty, when Annex B is revealed:
"NATO shall enjoy, together with their vehicles, vessels,
aircraft, and equipment, free and unrestricted passage and unimpeded
access throughout the FRY including associated airspace and territorial
waters. This shall include, but not be limited to, the right of
bivouac, maneuver, billet, and utilization of any areas or facilities
as required for support, training and operations". Had
NATO wished to sabotage the peace talks, they could not have devised
a better provision. To those who then persist in believing that
the NATO intervention was humanitarian, because Kosovo has no
resources the Americans might want, Chomsky answers that the war
was designed mostly to assert the military credibility of NATO,
which was struggling to appear relevant after the end of the Soviet
Union. Moreover, Serbia was one of the last bastions of resistance
to American hegemony in the Balkans, which also happen to be a
strategic location for US operations not only in Europe, but also
the Middle East. In other words, Serbia was punished for not conforming
to US plans for the region, and its destruction served as a warning
to other potential rebels. At no point is Chomsky trying to justify
Milosevic, but he is trying to set the record straight, and to
show how the Western powers are committing unconscionable crimes
in the name of "human rights and democracy". Unfortunately,
the new “military humanism” has continued regardless, its latest
victim being the thousands of Afghan civilians who died as a result
of the American bombs this year.
|