William Blake takes on
GlaxoSmithKline
Report of an action at the Tate
Britain Gallery in London
On the final day (11 February 2001) of the William
Blake exhibition at the Tate Britain Gallery in London, 30 people gathered on
the steps outside to reclaim Blake from 'the dead hand of capital, empire and
state' and to denounce the corporate sponsors of the Blake exhibition,
GlaxoSmithKline.
People dressed up as angels, tigers, chimney sweeps
and in other suitably Blakean costumes, with a child’s pushchair converted into
a ‘chariot of fire’. We banged drums, played music, and read out work from the
18th century radical poet, artist and visionary. A leaflet was handed out
saying:
"The William Blake exhibition at the Tate
Britain gallery makes it clear that Blake was a revolutionary as well as a
visionary – yet bizarrely it is sponsored by one of the world’s biggest
pharmaceutical companies, GlaxoSmithKline (formerly Glaxo Wellcome). While
Blake railed against poverty and oppression, GlaxoSmithKline is denying millions
of African people with HIV access to drugs that could save their lives"
(full text of leaflet below).
The action at the Tate happened the day before a march demanding affordable HIV treatments was due to take place in Cape Town, South Africa organised by the Treatment Action Campaign.
The action got a very good response from visitors to
the Gallery, many of whom stopped to listen to what was going on. One passer-by
who joined in and read out a Blake poem told the crowd - 'the spirit of Blake
is here on the steps'.
The Tate management were less sympathetic, calling
the police (although there were no arrests) and banning people from going into
the gallery, for the crime of reading out extracts of Blake - while inside they
were charging £8 for the privelege of seeing works by the same artist.
Blake vs. GlaxoSmithKline (text of
leaflet given out at the action)
“Is this a holy thing to see / In a rich and fruitful
land/ Babes reduced to misery… And so many children poor? / It is a land of
poverty!” (Blake, Holy Thursday)
‘Imagine witnessing devastating plague and sitting on
a cure for fear of incurring shareholder revolt. That essentially is the
position of drug companies’ (Ben Jackson of Action for South Africa)
The William Blake exhibition at the Tate Britain
gallery makes it clear that Blake was a revolutionary as well as a visionary –
yet bizarrely it is sponsored by one of the world’s biggest pharmaceutical
companies, GlaxoSmithKline (formerly Glaxo Wellcome).
While Blake railed against poverty and oppression,
GlaxoSmithKline is denying millions of African people with HIV access to drugs
that could save their lives. In Britain and the USA, combination therapy with
anti-retroviral drugs has transformed the life chances of people with HIV. But
of the world's 34 million people infected with HIV, 25 million live in
sub-Saharan Africa: and only 25,000 Africans (0.001 per cent of those infected)
receive the drugs. The reason is that that they and their governments cannot
afford to pay the market price for them.
Anti-retroviral drugs can be manufactured for a
fraction of the price they are sold by GlaxoSmithKline but this would undermine
profits. That is why Glaxo and other drugs companies are taking the South
African government to court to defend their ‘intellectual property rights’,
i.e. to prevent South Africa from making or buying abroad cheap, generic copies
of anti-HIV drugs to treat patients. Similar threats have been made against
other African countries.
Glaxo and the British government claim that companies
have a right to protection for the drugs they sell at high prices in order to
recoup research and development costs. Glaxo have already made millions from
AZT and 3TC, the two drugs in Combivir,
and in any case they were developed with the help of public funds in the
United States.
The problem isn’t just GlaxoSmithKline – other drugs
companies like Pfizer act in the same way. It isn’t even just the drugs
industry or multinational corporations. They are backed up by the British state
and by the World Trade Organisation’s TRIPS agreement (Trade-Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights) which allows owners of ‘intellectual property ’to
control the exploitation of their inventions worldwide, determining the price
at which they can be sold and the royalties they receive. They are backed up by
the whole logic of capitalism which decrees that ideas, objects, fields,
buildings, even genes, can be the sole property of companies and wealthy
individuals to be financially exploited at will.
In placing their logo on the art exhibitions,
corporations like Glaxo Wellcome are laying claim to the creative energies of
the past. In denying lifesaving drug treatments, they are demonstrating how the
creative energies of all of us, including medical knowledge, are subordinated
to the creation of wealth rather than the meeting of our needs.
“Let the slave grinding at the mill run out into the
field/ Let him look up into the heavens & laugh in the bright air; / Let
the inchained soul shut up in darkness and in sighing,/ Whose face has never
seen a smile in thirty weary years,/ Rise and look out; his chains are loose,
his dungeon doors are open/ And let his wife and children return from the
oppressor's scourge./ They look behind at every step & believe it is a
dream,/ Singing, 'The Sun has left his blackness, & has found a fresher
morning / And the fair Moon rejoices in the clear & cloudless night;/ For
Empire is no more, and now the Lion & Wolf shall cease” (Blake,
America)