Mirena
Intrauterine System (IUS)
The Mirena IUS is like
many other types of Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices (IUCD's or
coils) in that it is fitted by a doctor and remains in the womb for a
fixed amount of time, after which it must be changed. It is different,
however, in that it is much more effective than usual IUCD's and avoids
many of the side effects that put women off this choice of contraception. In this review the
abbreviation IUCD refers to this whole group of contraceptives, and the
terms Mirena and IUS will be usedinterchangeably. Most IUCD's make a
woman's periods heavier, but the Mirena actually makes periods lighter
than usual. Because of this, it is frequently used as a treatment for
heavy periods, even in women who don't need contraception. As can be seen
in the picture, it is made of a light, plastic, T-shaped frame with the
stem of the 'T' a bit thicker than the rest. This stem contains a tiny
storage system of a hormone called Levonorgestrel. This hormone is
also used in contraceptive pills such as Eugynon, Logynon, Microgynon,
Ovran 30, Ovranette and Trinordial. In the Mirena, however, a much lower
dose is released than when you take the Pill (about 1/7th strength), and
it goes directly to the lining of the womb, rather than through the blood
stream where it may lead to the common progesterone-type side effects (see
below).
If 1000 women used the
Mirena IUS for a year, only one would fall pregnant. This compares with
about 10 for the normal IUCD, 20 for the Pill and 10-15 for the injection
(Depot Provera). This is comparable to the effectiveness of sterilisation. Mirena acts as a
contraceptive in two ways: it makes the mucus at the neck of the womb (the
cervix) much thicker, preventing sperm from getting through and it
also makes the lining of the womb extremely thin, stopping implantation.
In some women it prevents egg release (ovulation). As with all IUCD's, if
it does fail, there is a higher risk of ectopic pregnancy (a pregnancy
located outside the womb, usually in the tube). If you felt pregnant or
had a positive pregnancy test, it is important to see your doctor to rule
this out. Overall, however, compared to women not using any contraception,
the risk of ectopic pregnancy is greatly reduced (around 2 per 10,000
women each year [1])
because the IUS is such a good contraceptive. If a pregnancy does
occur with an IUCD, it is advisable to remove the contraceptive if
possible - this reduces the risk of bleeding, infection and miscarriage.
Because failure is so rare, there is little information available on the
effects on an ongoing pregnancy with the Mirena still in place.
Before it is inserted,
the doctor will do an examination to make sure the womb is a normal size
and there is nothing else unusual to find. If there is some discharge,
swabs will be taken to rule out infection before it is placed. The IUS is
inserted within a week of beginning a period or at any time if your are
sure that you are not pregnant. It may be inserted immediately after
surgical termination of pregnancy, but should be deferred until 6 weeks
after delivery of a baby. A speculum is placed
in the vagina, like when you have a normal smear test, and the Mirena is
placed into the womb through the cervix. Because it contains the storage
of hormone, the stem is slightly wider than in normal IUCD's. This can
occasionally lead to difficulties with fitting, especially if you have not
had a baby before. In this situation, it would be helpful to use some
local anaesthetic. It should be fitted by someone who has been trained and
has experience in fitting IUCD's. It is a good idea to
take some painkillers a couple of hours before the fitting - this will
help reduce any discomfort. A good choice is Ibuprofen 400 mg, which can
be bought over-the-counter at a chemist (please check that this is safe
for you). Most women do not find the insertion procedure very
uncomfortable - usually much less than expected. Once the IUS is in
place, you won't be able to 'feel' it in your womb. Your doctor will show
you how to check for the strings, and it is very unusual for your partner
to be aware of it during intercourse. After fitting, a further appointment
should be made for six weeks later to check the strings can still be seen.
Yearly checks are advised after this appointment.
Removal involves a
speculum examination again and the IUS is removed by pulling on the
strings. This is only uncomfortable for a second or two as it comes out.
The hormone effect on the lining of the womb is reversed within a month
and normal periods and fertility returns. The IUS will last 5
years and, if required, a new one can be inserted at the same time the old
one is removed.
Although the IUS was
originally developed as a contraceptive, the discovery that it leads to
much lighter periods was a great bonus. Many gynaecologists now suggest
the Mirena as a treatment for heavy periods if tablet treatment doesn't
work. After 3 months use,
the average blood loss is 85% less, and by 12 months the flow is reduced
by 97% every cycle [2].
About one third of women using the IUS will not have any periods at all.
Although women initially find it a bit unusual not having periods, it
doesn't cause any problems. There is no 'build up' of blood, because the
hormone in the IUS prevents the lining of the womb from building up at
all. Often it is the excessive thickening of this lining that is the cause
of the problems in the first place. One study looked at 54
women who had heavy periods and were awaiting hysterectomy [3].
They all used the Mirena, and just under 70% were taken off the waiting
list because they were happy with the treatment. In another study of 50
similar women, 82% avoided major surgery [4]. The Mirena is now
licensed for treating heavy periods, and although this official licensing
is relatively new, it has been used 'off-license' for some time in this
way.
Although the IUS isn't
primarily used for painful periods, two studies [4,5]
have found that it does help in many cases (as often as 80% of the time).
If painful periods persist, it is usual to rule out any other problems
with a laparoscopy.
Large fibroids
are a common cause of heavy periods. If they are so large, or in such a
position that they make the inside of the womb an abnormal shape, it is
unlikely that the Mirena will remain in place, and would not be helpful as
a treatment. With small to moderate size fibroids, it is quite reasonable
to use the IUS and one study [5]
has found that fibroids are less common in women who use the Mirena. A
further paper has found that in the 5 women studied, a Mirena actually
reduced the size of their fibroids [6].
This is only one report, of course, and the IUS cannot be recommended as a
treatment for fibroids based on this alone, though it is very interesting.
PMS is a syndrome that
is thought to be caused by the varying hormones of the menstrual cycle.
There have been suggestions that the IUS may be useful as it will allow a
continuous dose of hormones to be given (oestrogen) without the worry of
excessive stimulation of the lining of the womb. Usually oestrogens are
combined with a course of a progestagen to prevent this, but many women
experience PMS-like symptoms with progestagens. At present there is little
published in the medical literature about the use of the Mirena in this
way, but for severe cases, where hysterectomy is being considered as the
only remaining alternative, it would certainly be reasonable to consider
this.
There is a growing
experience with the use of the IUS for women who require hormone
replacement therapy, but who have either bad PMS-like symptoms or erratic
bleeding on normal HRT preparations. The IUS with continuous implants,
tablets or patches of oestrogen provides good symptom relief with minimal
side effects. As its use in this way is not generally established in the
UK, this would normally be prescribed under the care of a gynaecologist.
In other countries (eg. Finland) the IUS is licensed for use in this way
and can be routinely used for up to 5 years.
Women who have
experienced an ectopic
pregnancy are at a greater risk of this happening again in future
pregnancies. For this reason, they are advised to choose a type of
contraception that does not increase this risk any further - in particular
they are encouraged to avoid IUCD's, as these are known to increase this
risk. The risk of ectopic pregnancy is very much lower with the IUS than
in women not using any contraception (60 times lower, in fact). Although
perhaps not a first choice, the IUS may be considered when other
contraceptives are really not suitable. As with most decisions in
medicine, it is about the balance of risk.
Expulsion.
In the early months of use, there is a very small chance that the IUS may
dislodge and come out, either in part or altogether. This risk may be
greater than with other IUCD's, presumably because it is that bit larger.
There may be symptoms such as bleeding or persistent pain not relieved by
simple pain killers, or it might be passed without any discomfort at all.
As the system reduces blood flow, sudden return of heavy periods might
suggest this has happened. Hormonal problems. Although
the IUS delivers its hormone directly to the lining of the womb, it does
lead to a slight increase in progesterone levels in the blood stream. The
levels are much lower than that found with the progestagen-only pill (POP)
and usually don't lead to side effects. If they do occur, most often they
are mild and only last up to 4-6 weeks. Side effects have included
headache, water retention, breast tenderness or acne. Ovarian cysts. Progestagen
hormones increase the chance of benign, simple ovarian cysts. This is more
common with the higher hormone levels associated with the progestagen-only
pill. Overall the risk is about 3 times higher (1.2% in IUS users versus
0.4% normally). These cysts most often do not require any treatment and
resolve on their own over 2-3 months. It is usual to arrange follow-up
ultrasound scans over this time if they do occur. The most common symptoms
of a cyst is abdominal pain that doesn't settle with simple painkillers. Bleeding problems. These
are without a doubt the most common problem associated with the Mirena. It
takes about 3 months for the lining of the womb to thin down and during
this time bleeding can be erratic or even heavy at times, but almost
always settles after 3-6 months. During the first month, 20% of users
experience prolonged bleeding of more than 8 days duration, but by the
third month only 3% have prolonged bleeding. Pelvic infection.
In general IUCD's increase the risk of infection of the womb, tubes and
other pelvic organs. Studies looking at Mirena suggest that this may not
be the case, with the IUS being protective against infection, particularly
in the age group most at risk (<25y). Although this would fit with the
thickening of the cervical mucus preventing infection getting through the
cervix, this finding is not universal in all studies. The actual long-term
risk of infection is very low, at less than 1% with 5 years' use. A World
Health Organisation study of over 22,000 users found that the infection
risk was only increased in the first 20 days after insertion. This
demonstrates the need to rule out infection in high-risk women before
inserting the IUS, and in this group a Chlamydia screen is advised.
The IUS is an
effective contraceptive and treatment for heavy periods. It reduces
menstrual pain, may be used with small to moderate fibroids and has the
potential as a treatment for severe PMS. It is associated with a low risk
of ectopic pregnancy and infection. It may be more difficult to insert
than standard IUCD's, in some women can lead to mild hormonal effects, and
commonly causes irregular bleeding in the initial months, though this
usually settles by 3-6 months. It is a particularly good treatment choice
for women with heavy periods who wish to avoid major surgery. |