A n i m a l   W r i t e s © sm
                                                 
The official ANIMAL RIGHTS ONLINE newsletter


Publisher   ~ EnglandGal@aol.com                                                 Issue # 02/09/03
      Editor ~ JJswans@aol.com
Journalists ~ ParkStRanger@aol.com
                ~ MichelleRivera1@aol.com
                ~
sbest1@elp.rr.com


THE ARTICLES IN THIS ISSUE ARE:

1  ~ Neo-McCarthyism, the Patriot Act, and the New Surveillance Culture
                Part 2  - By Dr. Steve Best
2  ~
A Neologism: Amitor  - By Greg Lawson
3  ~
It's Meatout Time Again
4  ~
Loving Animals to Death: Some Thoughts on Animal "Collectors"
                By Jim Willis
5  ~
ACT Radio - Animal Concerns of Texas
6  ~
Surrendered Eyes  - From Jerry Elmore Layne
7  ~
Memorable Quote

  *´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`
~1~
Neo-McCarthyism, the Patriot Act,
and the New Surveillance Culture

Part 2
By Dr. Steve Best - sbest1@elp.rr.com

In Part 1 of this article, I explored how a new ultra-repressive political culture is emerging around the U.S. Patriot Act. I described its origins and how animal and earth liberation movements are key targets of this new legislation reminiscent of the McCarthy period in the 1950s. In Part 2 of this article, I discuss the implications of the Patriot Act for animal rights and direct action in this new era of global terrorism.
***************.
Implications of the Patriot Act

“The jaws of power are always open to devour, and her arm is always stretched out, if possible, to destroy the freedom of thinking, speaking, and writing.”
                                                          John Adams

Under the Patriot Act, the government now has the power to violate the rights of activists or political suspects in ways such as the following:

** Demand from bookstores and libraries the names of books anyone purchased or borrowed. Workers at the store or library are thereafter under a firm gag order not to mention the request to anyone such as the media and they have no power to contest it in court

** Conduct secret surveillance of religious or political groups without the need to show probable cause. This includes clandestine searches of homes and offices in sneak and peak operations

** Increase wiretapping of phone calls and monitor Internet searches, email correspondence, and chat room discussions. Internet Service Providers may be required to hand over content information and customer records to law officials without a court order or subpoena

** Have broad access to a person’s medical, financial, and educational records

** Eavesdrop on conversations between lawyers and clients in federal custody

** Detain foreigners indefinitely without charges or right to counsel

To do all this surveillance, the Pentagon has initiated the method of “data mining” and the system of “Total Information Awareness” that builds on the infamous FBI Carnivore program for Internet surveillance. This means that the state is monitoring electronic communication and research in order to identify possible “terrorists.” All federal agents need to say to the courts, should they ask, is that their prying is relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation. If a judge believes a request is without merit, he or she must grant it anyway. At the same times, citizen rights for disclosure of public documents and records under the Freedom of Information Act increasingly are being weakened and denied.

The Patriot Act also creates the new legal category of “domestic terrorist” and defines it in a chillingly broad manner. According to the Patriot Act, the crime of domestic terrorism is committed when a person engages in activity “that involves acts dangerous to human life that violate the laws of the U.S. …and appear to be intended: to intimidate or coerce a civilian population [or] to influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion.”

Clearly “intimidation” and “coercion” could mean anything, and the government does not adequately distinguish between violent and nonviolent methods of persuasion. This definition is a direct challenge to liberation groups like the ALF and ELF that are targeted as top domestic terrorist threats. Indeed, nearly any protest group can fit the definition of terrorists, for what is it to “intimidate” or “coerce” a “civilian population” or “to influence the policy of the government by intimidation or coercion”?  Protests often are intimidating, and their entire point is to “influence” policy.

Not only do the ALF and ELF fall under the definition of “domestic terrorism,” but also groups like PETA. For “harboring,” “concealing,” “aiding,” or “lending material support to” “terrorists” is punishable under the Patriot Act. PETA has given money to well-known animal rights “terrorists” such as Rod Coronado, Gary Yourofsky, and Josh Harper, and in Ashcroft’s world this makes PETA aides and abettors of terror. Indeed, right wing industry organizations like the Center For Consumer Freedom are denouncing even the Humane Society of the United States as a terrorist group for allegedly funding an Internet service used by the ALF and hiring “ALF-affiliated criminal” J.P. Goodwin in 2001.

Similarly, if you shelter dogs that are rescued from a laboratory by the ALF, or if you provided a room for a demonstrator who later became involved in a violent protest activity, you too could be arraigned under the Patriot Act. A foreign student involved with PETA or, certainly, the ALF, could be retained and deported for providing assistance to a “domestic terrorist” organization. Speaking out in support of the ALF or ELF can earn you a criminal charge, as can taking pictures of animal abuse in laboratories or factory farms and slaughterhouses. In our Orwellian culture where truth is falsehood and falsehood is truth, documenting animals tortured in a slaughterhouse is terrorism, but beating and killing animals in unspeakably vicious ways is not.

Amidst the current dragnet, the penalties for liberation activities are far higher that previously. Whereas the crime of arson on a vivisection laboratory, for example, carried a penalty of not more than twenty years, the Patriot Act amends the law to read “for any term of years or for life.” The Patriot Act also has removed the statue of limitations for specific terrorists offenses, including those that create a “foreseeable risk” of death or injury to another person. The maximum penalty for providing material support to, harboring, or concealing a “terrorist” increases from ten to fifteen years in prison.

That’s When I Reach For My Revolver

“When a long train of abuses and usurpations  …evinces a design to reduce the people under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.”
                                                       Thomas Jefferson

A collective insanity is sweeping the nation no less absurd, outrageous, frightening, and irrational than the Red Scare of the 1950s. The Patriot Act expands government’s law enforcement powers nationwide as it minimizes meaningful review and oversight by an independent judicial body. Rather, the law is reduced to a Soviet-style, rubber-stamp device, compelled to grant an order authorizing surveillance so long as the FBI, CIA, or Justice Department say the magic words -- “This surveillance is part of an authorized terrorist or intelligence investigation,” or just, “Do it.” The Bush world is straight out of the film Minority Report where you are guilty until presumed innocent, and the government condemns you even for thinking an illegal thought and arrests you before you have a chance to possibly put the thought into action.
         
Liberation movements are being demonized not just as whacko or extreme, but also as terrorist. Surveillance is increasing in inverse relation to legal accountability and political scrutiny.  Even Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) acts and extortion laws developed two decades ago to fight organized crime are now being used against groups like SHAC, with activists being arraigned under such charges in cities like Boston and San Antonio.

Clearly the stakes of the game are higher, and this should prompt new reflection on what direct action tactics are appropriate in the face of these new attacks. Activists should not be afraid or intimidated, but they also need to know their rights, or what is left of them, and everyone needs to exercise particularly high levels of security.  Even a tenuous association with the ALF could satisfy the Patriot Act’s definition of harboring, concealing, or supporting a “terrorist.” It is important that activists have an awareness of the history of state repression, and to know, in particular, how the FBI COINTELPRO infiltrated, raided, disrupted, and destroyed the many groups and causes attacking the government during the 1960s and thereafter. The government may right now be unleashing a similar war against the ALF, ELF, and SHAC, although they will have a much harder time with the ALF and ELF because of their underground, decentralized, cellular level of organization.
         
The movement needs more lawyers, but it must in the first place strive to avoid long and costly court battles as these drain time, energy, and will, as happened to SHACtivists in San Antonio, Texas when HLS’s insurance company, Marsh, fought back with lawsuits claiming harassment. Liberationists must resist being defined as violent and extremists; they must defend themselves rhetorically and philosophically, establishing a sharp distinction between theft, property destruction, and terrorism. They must also work on the philosophical level to challenge the status of animals as property and to define them to be, rather, subjects of a complex life, as are we.

In the current neo-McCarthyist climate, activists need to tone down the rhetoric, so as not to hand the state the rope with which to hang themselves and the movement. The enemy reads our writings and comes to our lectures, recording every word, as is obvious by their use of the infamous Bruce Friedrich sound bite from the national animal rights conference of 2002 that champions property destruction. I am elated to see the “marvelous new militancy” (Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.) of groups like SHAC, but we must not transgress non-violent boundaries or indulge in antics such as harassing family members of employees working for corporations like HLS. We must avoid even threats to violence, not only to escape the harsher penalties for such speech but also to adhere to the higher moral ground that activists rightly claim. Be intelligent, but do not be afraid; take strength from the courage of King and Gandhi who risked their lives for justice and fought harder when the state repression got worse. Now would be an excellent time to revisit their writings and actions.

We must attack militarism, link this to our general critique of violence, and grasp the connections between militarism abroad and suppression of dissent at home. We must resolutely defend the Constitution, because fundamental rights are under attack. Unfortunately, the Patriot Act and the damages it has wrought to civil liberties are going to scar our society for a long time to come. There is no guarantee that freedoms lost once will return again, especially if the new global paradigm of heightened dangers and insecurities will prevail indefinitely.
         
A great sign of hope, however, is that in communities throughout the country, city councils and local governments are passing resolutions against the Patriot Act. From Ithaca, New York to Oakland, California, over two dozen councils have condemned the Patriot Act as anti-constitutional and devoid of moral legitimacy, even if it is the law.  Taking more than just symbolic action, cities like Ithaca are requiring city employees (e.g., librarians) to adopt a policy of non-cooperation with the Patriot Act if legitimate government action against terrorism violates the civil rights and liberties of people within their communities. In effect, entire cities are adopting policies of civil disobedience as they pit individual rights and state duties against the federal government. Where Congress has proved cowardly and inept in its duties, city governments are taking on protection of the Constitution as their own responsibility. As one member of the Oakland Civil Rights Defense Committee said, “Congress hasn’t been able to check this unconstitutional executive grab, so it is up to us to reclaim our fundamental rights of free speech, free association, due process and equal protection.”
         
Wisely, local communities realize that we must not accept the false dualism the Bush administration and its accomplices are trying to foist on us -- either security or liberty.  Sewing seeds of mass paranoia about the great Evil lurking everywhere, the Bush administration is dismantling liberties in the name of Homeland Security. Citizens who challenge Bush’s efforts to wage war with Iraq are denounced on national media as traitors who should go to jail. According to some critics, Bush and Ashcroft have compromised freedom in ways previous administrations have not even in times of formally declared war. Just as the war on drugs is a Trojan horse for the entrenchment of state power in our personal lives, the ever-so misnamed Patriot Act is an anti-democratic vehicle of conservative reaction against citizen dissent against globalization, corporate destruction of animals and the earth, and a multitude of injustices.
        
While the nation braces for war with Iraq and additional attacks from Al Quaeda, a key aspect of the terrorist agenda is already realized. If their mission is to destroy the foundations of Western democracy, then, with the help of Bush and Ashcroft, they are succeeding.

*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
~2~
A Neologism:  Amitor
By Greg Lawson - ParkStRanger@aol.com

From Merriam-Webster...
Main Entry: ne·ol·o·gism
Function: noun
Etymology: French néologisme, from ne- + log- + -isme -ism
Date: 1800
1 : a new word, usage, or expression
2 : a meaningless word coined by a psychotic
(ok, ok, read on, sheesh, just because I'm psychotic doesn't invalidate this concept)

We define the world with words.  We have invented words to describe what our senses perceive and what our imaginations can imagine.  To a very large extent, language affects the way we interpret reality.  Associations between words motivate us to actions.  Lion = fearsome = run.

The word "predator" means "an animal that preys upon other animals."  There is no antonym for "predator" in the English language.  There is no word in any other language that the Amitor project has researched, which defines behaviors opposite to predation.

A man named Tom Hufford realized this and invented the word "amitor" from the latin "ami" for friend and "tor" to denote the agent or doer of an action...thus amitor, to be a friend.  "No one is born hating...if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love, for love comes more naturally to the human heart than its opposite." - Tom Hufford

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines predator in this manner...
Main Entry: pred·a·tor  Function: noun
Date: 1912
1 : one that preys, destroys, or devours
2 : an animal that lives by predation

and predation...
Main Entry: pre·da·tion
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English predacion, from Latin praedation-, praedatio, from praedari
Date: 15th century
1 : the act of preying or plundering : DEPREDATION
2 : a mode of life in which food is primarily obtained by the killing and consuming of animals

and depredate
Main Entry: dep·re·date
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): -dat·ed; -dat·ing
Etymology: Late Latin depraedatus, past participle of depraedari, from Latin de- + praedari to plunder
Date: 1626
transitive senses : to lay waste : PLUNDER , RAVAGE
intransitive senses : to engage in plunder

The proposed definition for "amitor" is 1) a creature who does not use violent, physically extreme, coercive, emotional, exploitive or economic force on those of its own or other species for its existence or its pleasure.  2) a standard bearer of non-arrogance.  3) one who only uses force for self-defense.  The antonym for "amitor" is "predator."

The mission of the Amitor Project is to have this new word introduced into the English language and included in dictionaries by 2025. 

The world needs more words to describe peace and nonviolent behaviors.  The more we are able to speak of peace, the more peace becomes reality.

For more information about the Amitor Project and to sign an online petition to have the word amitor included in dictionaries, visit:

www.amitor.org  
Amitor Home Page
and
http://www.amitor.org/petition.html   petition

*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
~3~
It's Meatout Time Again
From FARM - farm@farmusa.org

YES, IT'S TIME TO GET ON BOARD MEATOUT 2003!
- Time to start planning your Meatout 20003 activities
- Time to promote healthy and compassionaate eating
- Time to visit our updated web site at <www.meatout.org.

Meatout is your best, once-a-year opportunity to have your friends and neighbors "kick the meat habit and explore a more wholesome, less violent diet of fruits, vegetables, and grains."

Meatout is your best, once-a-year opportunity to help the animals: every 1% reduction in national meat consumption prevents the agony and death of 100 million innocent, feeling animals - more than the combined number of animals victimized by all other human activities. Every person you turn away from meat consumption, saves an average of 1,500 animals.

Join thousands of caring people in all 50 states and 20 other countries on March 20 by hosting a Meatout event in your area.

Participating is easy
Small & large events are needed
We are here to help Visit
www.meatout.org to find detailed information and to request materials, even if your plans are not yet finalized or you’re just curious.

Dawn Moncrief, Coordinator, Meatout 2003
www.meatout.org
   info@meatout.org   1-800-MEATOUT


*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
~4~
"Loving Animals to Death":
Some Thoughts on Animal "Collectors"

By Jim Willis - jwillis@bellatlantic.net
The Tiergarten Sanctuary Trust
   

Almost every week, somewhere in America, an animal collector/hoarder situation is raided, often requiring the rescue of hundreds of animals at a time. Often the media, the authorities, and the rescue community condemns and accuses. We are so accustomed to being betrayed by our society and government that we have little tolerance for being betrayed by one of our "own."

The typical collector is most often female. That's not a sexist criticism on my part, women are frequently the most compassionate and nurturing of the genders. The typical collector believes that any life is better than any death.

As many know, I spent much of my adult life in Europe, with it's no-kill shelters, euthanasia only by veterinarians and only by lethal injection, their strict licensing, animal control and welfare laws, and national databases of convicted animal abusers and neglecters. Should I have ever met a "collector/hoarder" in that environment, I could have more easily called that person "crazy," while still giving them credit for somehow eluding the laws and authorities. I would have questioned their reasons for attempting to break laws and efforts by government that made good sense.

I cannot do that in North America. We have created a prevailing system of apathy and ignorance, where shelters and volunteer rescue efforts cannot possibly stem the tide, where government has mostly turned its back on animal welfare and control efforts, where anything "animal" is usually paid lip service and given the lowest priority, where animals often die horrible deaths, where national animal organizations can barely fund the resources they provide to "crisis" situations, and where a lot of people are making a lot of money from animals.

I get a lot of mail each week and often from rescuers who are out of hope and out of funds. They sometimes describe personal situations to me that worry me, and they ask me if I have any suggestions of help for them. I don't and I wish I did. (Occasionally, I've even received some "contemplating suicide"-type messages that make me lose sleep.) In fact, I've even angered some Rescue efforts with criticisms (largely borne of frustration), because their efforts and websites and fundraisers and other events include NO advocacy and education components. That means we will always be forced to deal with the status quo, rescuing animal by animal, with no end in sight (and where I'm often "wrong" is that's still better than nothing!). For every "accomplishment" we cheer about, some other situation or decision by government seems to take us two steps backwards.

I understand how the system in North America creates animal "collectors." I feel sorry for them. We who think we've got a handle on the situation, who have learned somehow to say "no," even when it's hard, and who care enough to ensure that every animal under our care receives the best of our efforts, are the lucky ones. We managed to stay upstream. A few threw themselves into the floodwaters and they are drowning because of their compassion.

If we could get America and Canada to "no kill" as soon as possible, if we could outlaw every method of "euthanasia" except by lethal injection (http://www.crean.com/kindness), if we could get every animal lover in the country to write a letter to an editor on an animal issue, and demand that our media report on those issues, and hold government at all levels accountable for, at the least, animal control and welfare issues - maybe we could stop creating "collectors" and maybe we could negate the need to rescue hundreds/thousands of poorly cared for animals at a time who further deplete rescue resources.

Below are some additional resources on the issues. Please join the advocacy and educational effort as soon as you can.

Thanks,
Jim
http://www.crean.com/jimwillis

"Loving Animals to Death," a psychological profile on Animal Collectors from the Animal Protection Institute: http://www.api4animals.org/areas.asp?c=4&ID=59

National Cruelty Investigation Schools: http://www.missouri.edu/~letiwww/animal3.htm


*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
~5~
ACT Radio - Animal Concerns of Texas
By Greg Lawson - ParkStRanger@aol.com

Be sure to listen to ACT Radio tonight at 9:30pm EST (7:30pm, mountain time) with Animal Rights Online journalists Greg Lawson and Steve Best.  KTEP can be heard over the web with Real Radio, which is a free download.

http://www.ktep.org/program_detail.ssd?id=103
El Paso NPR - KTEP 88.5 : National Public Radio for the Southwest 

Bruce Friedrich, Director of Vegan Outreach for PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is our guest.  We will discuss Bruce's campaigns against McDonalds, Wendys, Burger King and KFC, the outlandish tactics of PETA and veganism in general.

If you enjoy the show, please contact KTEP and tell them you support ACT Radio and are pleased to hear this kind of programming. 

General Feedback: http://www.ktep.org/index.ssd

A note about getting Real Radio if you don't already have it...
On the KTEP website you will see an icon on the left that says Listen to KTEP Online, click it.  The next page will say "In order to listen to KTEP on-line you will need the Real Player, which is available for free on the Real website. Click here to visit their download area."  Go there.
That page will try to sell you the deluxe RealOne Player, but look in the top right hand corner, there is a link that says "Free RealOne Player."  Go there.
Now on this page, on the bottom right, you will see a link that says "Download the Free RealOne Player Only."  This is what you want.
The download takes a little time, so be sure to do this early so you won't miss today's installment of ACT Radio.

*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
~6~
   Surrendered Eyes
From Jerry Elmore Layne
  
Throw-aways, strays, cast-offs...
Kittens, Puppies, Dogs, Cats and oh, so many more.

    A complete, inexcusable wasted loss of love,
loyalty and friendship.
A loss to terrible fear.
A loss to shivers, to loud noise, to the banging of cages and
... yes, a loss to hopelessness.

    Adoption is so isolated. 
Life, in itself, is misery and loneliness.
    The eyes, the eyes tell all. 
The watery, downhearted and surrendered eyes tell all.

    A dog biscuit is passed-over for the simple
act of a friendly pat on the head and a happy, loving voice.
    Hot.  Very hot and humid. 
Cold, Very cold and windy.
    No grass, No sun. 
Concrete and Strangers of All Kinds.
    Now, very afraid. 

    Now.  It is the time for death. There is NO adoption.
    And, please, do not say, 'putting to sleep,'
for it is the last, few remaining
moments on earth.

     A kiss from me and a "I love you," and the injection begins.
     ...The surrendered eyes are  .... forever closed
and each and every, single one of these wonderful creatures
breaks your heart."

*´`³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`*´`³¤³´`*:»«:*´`³¤³´`*:»³¤³´`*:»§«:*´`´`*:»«:*³¤³´`³¤³´`
~7~
Memorable Quote

"Of all the creatures, man is the most detestable. Of the entire brood, he's the one that possesses malice. He is the only creature that inflicts pain for sport, knowing it to be pain. The fact that man knows right from wrong proves his intellectual superiority to the other creatures; but the fact that he can do wrong proves his moral inferiority to any creature that cannot."
                                              ~ Mark Twain, American Novelist

«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»
Susan Roghair - EnglandGal@aol.com
Animal Rights Online
P O Box 7053
Tampa, Fl 33673-7053
http://www.oocities.org/RainForest/1395/

-=Animal Rights Online=- 
«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»
(Permission Granted To Quote/Forward/Reprint/Repost This Newsletter In
Whole Or In Part with credit given to EnglandGal@aol.com)

*   Please forward this to a friend who you think
might be interested in subscribing to our newsletter.

* ARO gratefully accepts and considers articles for publication
from subscribers on veg*anism and animal issues. 
Send submissions to JJswans@aol.com


** Fair Use Notice**
This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners.  I believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 

 

Return to the ARO Newsletter Archives

Return to the ARO Homepage