 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comparison of Deconvolution use in Procesing | |||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Deconvolution in AIP4WIN | |||||||||||||||||||
| click image to enlarge | |||||||||||||||||||
| No Deconvolution | |||||||||||||||||||
| The same data was used in both cases, the key difference in the end result being the use of the Deconvolution filter in AIP4WIN v1.1 The deconvolution filter was used after the initial stacking of the individual exposures used to create the LRGB components. Image specifics: L= 30x 10sec R= 11x 45sec G= 11x 45sec B= 11x 90sec Camera ST7E with CFW8 Operating temp = -25C Telescope = Takahashi FSQ106 Focal length used = 530mm |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Back to M42 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Email: | rdcrisp@earthlink.net | ||||||||||||||||||