Special Report from South Coast Region 11
February 2000
Where Now?
History is usually made by a series of past recorded events.
By learning about our past one would be able to make better decisions by which influence we will shape our future. From time to time is wise to momentarily stop in our quest to plan ahead and evaluate past events.
Perhaps one of great historical masonic events in our Jurisdiction, the importance of which passed almost unnoticed to the majority of the Brethren, happened just a few years ago.
Masonry in New South Wales took a great step in 1988 when the Grand Master, MWBro. Ronald Lewis H.Johnson assumed the leadership and instituted, as part of his contribution to Freemasonry, the Commission for the Future for the United Grand Lodge of NSW.
The Commission for the Future was formed to recommend the implementation of changes in order to strengthen Freemasonry in NSW, to improve its image, and to try to restore some of its former glory. The idea to form the Commission for the Future was originally conceived during the planning of the Centenary Celebrations and a recommendation from the Finance Committee in October, 1988 to the Board of General Purposes was adopted by the Board.
This Commission established the following seven goals:
The Commission presented its Final Report on November, 1990.
Perusing through the Commission's Final Report, one can see that the membership problem held the key to the Commission's deliberations. The Commission reported "that it may sound too simplistic, but if a solution could be found to halt the erosion of the Craft consistently diminishing membership, Freemasonry will be in a healthier state."
The Commission reported that "it did not seek to provide all the cure for the Craft's ills, but a vital step towards halting the outflow of members and establishing a vision for the future." The Commission was on target in its summation of our problems
Some of the recommendations were;
In 1992, the Grand Master MWBro. Noel Frederick Dunn took in the process of consolidating the gains flowing from the Commission for the Future by implementing a Strategic Planning Group, necessary to bring Masonry in New South Wales into the new millenium as a dynamic and growing organisation.
Planning was then and it is now a very important part of Freemasonry as it is for every organisation. It could represent the crucial point between success and failure.
During my working years as an Engineering Planner for one of the Australian major airlines, good planning was the difference between aircraft on the ground losing revenue, and success with satisfied passengers and profits.
Masonic planning in NSW before 1988, even though not necessarily neglected, was not used as a long-term strategy. We only have to look at our lodges to understand the situation of Freemasonry in general.
We were then enjoying a tremendous period of membership growth; we had so many candidates that our main problem was in how to contain membership to a reasonable level. We only have to listen to some of our older Past Masters and the "gluttony" in which they refer to the extraordinary number of initiates during his Mastership, with no consideration to the fact that "many" sometimes does not equate with "better", that there was a race as to who could initiate more members, and that making members does not always commensurate with making good Masons.
Finances were not a problem with the influx of new members and to see a lodge preparing a financial budget was unheard of.
We did not have time to educate our members, as there was not sufficient time in our lodges for lectures or masonic education. We needed to organise emergent meetings to be able to cope with Degree Work for new candidates. We may have neglected the old Brethren for the new members.
We did not even notice when the membership started to decline. I don't believe many of us recognised that it was not a temporary trend and assumed it was just a periodic cycle without becoming aware that it was the world that was changing around us.
People started to live faster, become more affluent with more time to spend on leisure activities, a great leap in instant communications, and suddenly we became conscious of the real danger of evolving into an organisation without relevancy.
Even within our Lodges there is certain amount of irrelevancy, as candidates can hardly wait one month between degrees, often unprepared for the examination, with many brethren taking Office shortly after having been Raised, with Masters not elected on merit but because they are MM's and not PM's.
How can we demand excellence from our MM's when the Master is reading the Degree work? How can we demand excellence from our DGIWs when they were not good Masters? This is of course a generalised view and not an expression concerning particular individuals.
There are two different types of planning, strategic and tactical planning. Whilst tactical planning is good for taking advantage of short term opportunities as theyarise, such as the Freemasonry courses for U3A members, sponsorship of outside organisations, Surf Life Saving, Tidy Towns, etc. one must take into consideration the benefits of long term strategic planning if we are to achieve success, and for differences to be made.
In tactical planning if we find that one occasional programme is showing a desired result, we should endeavour to translate it to long range planning for any noticeable impact. In the same vein, if a good programme does not seem to be working at first, we should investigate the reasons for the failure, or its lack of complete success. Small tactical changes may be required, as it may be a good idea.
But let us be aware that planning, tactical or long range must not be limited to the increase of our membership, however membership targets need to be maintained but not at the cost of quality, as without a viable membership and its inherent financial resources we would not be able to support quality activities.
One must be aware of the needs of modern society, as what worked for our forefathers, may not necessarily work today.
To be more visible in the community is imperative. We only have to look into the past and observe that the periods of expansion coincided with membership quality and visibility within the community
To attain these goals and to support the efforts and the success of the strategic Planning group, we should now address specific areas such as;
So we must assume that for any organisation to grow it must provide something of value to its members, and that the members must perceive its value. What is value for some members, may not be recognised by other members. An education campaign to that effect may be necessary.
To provide "real" benefits to our members or "value for money". I was recently asked to formulate an opinion about our Grand Lodge Web Page site. My answer was that
it did not represent value for money. Masons "surfing the net" are using time, efforts and money to get something in return. In our web Site they can only get some information easily obtainable elsewhere.
The Internet being a medium without frontiers, masons and non-masons may visit our site from all over the world looking for research material. I believe some masonic or historical lectures about our State should be included, together with Masonic and Non-Masonic activities and news, i.e. the sale of the Paralympic Tickets, Surf Life Saving events connected with our sponsorship, etc.
Masonic education and leadership training must be central to our objectives. The proposition from the Member's Board to be placed before the meeting of RGCs in February 2000 with regards to Regional Masonic Education and Leadership training is a prime example of good vision and sound management.
We must improve communications (or masonic understanding) within and outside our organisation, and that means between our Grand Lodge and Lodges, between lodges, and between our Jurisdiction with other Sister Constitutions. If we are to attract and retain members, communication is an essential requisite.
The importance of communicating at every level cannot be underestimated. Recently I was talking with RWBro. George James, PAGM, who said that perhaps we are talking about our problems only among ourselves with the inherent dangers of becoming introverted in our views, that it may be the time to consult with people with unbiased opinions.
The new, (and I hope the future generation will follow) are used to "transparency" or open communications, and we must be seen as more open to the public as there is a tendency to associate lack of information with suspicious intent. Any member has the right and the obligation to understand the working of the organisation to which he belongs.
To maintain a sound financial basis. This cannot be maintained with the current dues paid by lodge members. Virtually all lodges within our Jurisdiction are facing serious financial problems. The problem is amplified by the fact that for many years' membership dues were not increased to keep up with inflation, and now the dues structure have become so ingrained in our members that raising dues to the levels of 50 years ago would be an impossible task.
We have had now for several years a Mission Statement, are we implementing it or how are we going to implement that vision? Many of the Brethren may be well informed, but is the cross section of the membership aware? I would like to see the Mission Statement published in the Book of Constitutions.
This is the time to reflect and ask ourselves, "where now?"
What kind of organisation should we be in the future? This is perhaps the most difficult question. What will be our position in today's society and in 20 or 30 years hence? With no wish to ignore financial viability and funding of worthwhile projects, how important is the number of members? And how are we going to bring the necessary changes to become an organisation of excellence before it is too late?
I know that many are wary of change and of innovation, of moving away from the faithfully tested path, but lets remember our Grand Master's motto "Dare to be different".
There are many other basic questions we should address.
With the impetus of this new technology at our hands, we can use it to our advantage, for example;
One of the great things about Freemasonry is that everybody has a niche in our organisation. It is not geared only for Ritualistic inclined Brethren, but for Historical Researchers, Administration, Ceremonial, and even for brethren who have reached certain declining age and are content to sit in the sidelines and watch the proceedings. Everybody paid dues and we must provide for their immediate needs.
The Grand Master recently announced that he commissioned the Deputy Grand Master to prepare a submission with regards to work in different degrees within our Jurisdiction.
One of my masonic contacts overseas, the Deputy Grand Master of a European Grand Lodge provided me with information about the success of such a scheme.
They are working with ceremonies based on the Emulation Rite, the Ancient and Accepted Rite, the Scottish Primitive Rite, the Scottish Rectified Rite and their own ritual. The candidate is informed of the differences for him to make a choice before his initiation, which tends to provide more interest in Freemasonry.
The Grand Master is providing us with a golden opportunity by visiting our region in March 2000 where every member can offer suggestions in an open forum directly to the Grand Master.
One may find that some suggestions can only be implemented at Grand Lodge level, some by our own Lodges and many of our suggestions undertaken by dedicated individuals. One must remember that nothing happens if one doesn't help to make it happen.
Finally, I believe the future of Freemasonry in this Jurisdiction is in providing good and sound leadership in bringing fundamental changes in the perceptions of our activities. Changes need not necessarily be a threat, as changes have always been occurring through generations. It will be up to every Brother in this Jurisdiction and not the work of few individuals.
February, 2000
Juan Carlos Alvarez, PJGW
Regional Grand Counsellor
South Coast Region 11